Mercurio Meagan D, Smith Paul A
The Australian Wine Research Institute, P.O. Box 197, Glen Osmond, South Australia 5064, Australia.
J Agric Food Chem. 2008 Jul 23;56(14):5528-37. doi: 10.1021/jf8008266. Epub 2008 Jun 24.
Quantification of red grape tannin and red wine tannin using the methyl cellulose precipitable (MCP) tannin assay and the Adams-Harbertson (A-H) tannin assay were investigated. The study allowed for direct comparison between the repeatability of the assays and for the assessment of other practical considerations such as time efficiency, ease of practice, and throughput, and assessed the relationships between tannin quantification by both analytical techniques. A strong correlation between the two analytical techniques was observed when quantifying grape tannin (r(2) = 0.96), and a good correlation was observed for wine tannins (r(2) = 0.80). However, significant differences in the reported tannin values for the analytical techniques were observed (approximately 3-fold). To explore potential reasons for the difference, investigations were undertaken to determine how several variables influenced the final tannin quantification for both assays. These variables included differences in the amount of tannin precipitated (monitored by HPLC), assay matrix variables, and the monomers used to report the final values. The relationship between tannin quantification and wine astringency was assessed for the MCP and A-H tannin assays, and both showed strong correlations with perceived wine astringency (r(2) = 0.83 and r(2) = 0.90, respectively). The work described here gives guidance to those wanting to understand how the values between the two assays relate; however, a conclusive explanation for the differences in values between the MCP and A-H tannin assays remains unclear, and further work in this area is required.
研究了使用甲基纤维素可沉淀(MCP)单宁分析法和亚当斯 - 哈伯森(A - H)单宁分析法对红葡萄单宁和红酒单宁进行定量分析。该研究允许直接比较两种分析方法的重复性,并评估其他实际因素,如时间效率、操作简便性和通量,同时评估了两种分析技术在单宁定量方面的关系。在对葡萄单宁进行定量分析时,观察到两种分析技术之间存在很强的相关性(r(2) = 0.96),对葡萄酒单宁也观察到良好的相关性(r(2) = 0.80)。然而,观察到两种分析技术报告的单宁值存在显著差异(约3倍)。为了探究差异的潜在原因,进行了调查以确定几个变量如何影响两种分析方法的最终单宁定量。这些变量包括沉淀单宁量的差异(通过高效液相色谱法监测)、分析基质变量以及用于报告最终值的单体。对MCP和A - H单宁分析法评估了单宁定量与葡萄酒涩味之间的关系,两者均与感知到的葡萄酒涩味显示出很强的相关性(分别为r(2) = 0.83和r(2) = 0.90)。这里描述的工作为那些想要了解两种分析方法的值之间如何关联的人提供了指导;然而,MCP和A - H单宁分析法之间值差异的确切解释仍不清楚,该领域需要进一步的研究。