Cornwell Brian R, Echiverri Aileen M, Covington Matthew F, Grillon Christian
Mood and Anxiety Disorders Program, National Institute of Mental Health, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Psychol Sci. 2008 Jun;19(6):615-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02131.x.
Theories of animal defensive behavior postulate that imminent, predictable threat elicits highly focused attention toward the threat source, whereas remote, unpredictable threat elicits distributed attention to the overall environment. We used threat of shock combined with measurement of prepulse inhibition of the startle reflex to test these claims in humans. Twenty-seven participants experienced periods of threat and safety. Threat and safe periods were short or long, with the short threat periods conveying relatively predictable, imminent shocks and the long threat periods conveying unpredictable shocks. Startle reflexes were elicited with equal numbers of acoustic probes presented alone, preceded by a tactile prepulse, or preceded by an auditory prepulse. We observed enhanced tactile relative to auditory prepulse inhibition during short threat periods only. This finding supports the notion that imminent threat, but not remote threat, elicits attention focused toward the relevant modality, potentially reflecting preparatory activity to minimize the impact of the noxious stimulus.
动物防御行为理论假定,迫在眉睫、可预测的威胁会引发对威胁源高度集中的注意力,而遥远、不可预测的威胁会引发对整体环境的分散注意力。我们使用电击威胁并结合惊吓反射的前脉冲抑制测量来在人类中测试这些说法。27名参与者经历了威胁期和安全期。威胁期和安全期有短有长,短威胁期传达相对可预测、迫在眉睫的电击,长威胁期传达不可预测的电击。通过单独呈现等量的声学探针、在其之前有触觉前脉冲或在其之前有听觉前脉冲来引发惊吓反射。我们仅在短威胁期观察到相对于听觉前脉冲抑制,触觉前脉冲抑制增强。这一发现支持了这样一种观点,即迫在眉睫的威胁而非遥远的威胁会引发对相关模态的注意力集中,这可能反映了为尽量减少有害刺激的影响而进行的准备活动。