Grillon C, Davis M
Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510, USA.
Psychophysiology. 1997 Sep;34(5):511-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1997.tb01737.x.
The effects of shock anticipation and attention to external stimuli on prepulse inhibition (PPI) were compared. In the threat-of-shock experiment, acoustic startle stimuli were presented with and without prepulses when aversive shocks were or were not anticipated. In the control experiment, startle and prepulse stimuli were delivered during periods with attended or ignored external stimuli. In the threat-of-shock experiment, startle was potentiated (fear-potentiated startle) and PPI was increased by shock anticipation. A gradual reduction in the overall PPI throughout the experiment was also found. In the control experiment, only PPI was increased in the attend condition. The PPI level remained constant throughout the experiment. The increase in PPI in the threat and attend conditions may have resulted from an increase in the general level of alertness that facilitated the processing of the prepulse. The gradual decrease in PPI in the threat experiment was hypothesized to result from a progressive deficit in sensory functioning due to the stressful nature of repeated shock anticipation.
比较了惊吓预期和对外部刺激的注意对前脉冲抑制(PPI)的影响。在惊吓威胁实验中,当预期有或没有厌恶性电击时,呈现伴有或不伴有前脉冲的听觉惊吓刺激。在对照实验中,在注意或忽略外部刺激的期间给予惊吓和前脉冲刺激。在惊吓威胁实验中,惊吓增强(恐惧增强惊吓),并且惊吓预期会增加PPI。在整个实验中还发现总体PPI逐渐降低。在对照实验中,仅在注意条件下PPI增加。在整个实验中PPI水平保持恒定。威胁和注意条件下PPI的增加可能是由于警觉性总体水平的提高,这有助于前脉冲的处理。在威胁实验中PPI的逐渐降低被假设为是由于反复惊吓预期的压力性质导致感觉功能逐渐衰退所致。