Breckon Jeff David, Johnston Lynne Halley, Hutchison Andrew
Faculty of Health and Wellbeing, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK.
J Phys Act Health. 2008 May;5(3):398-417. doi: 10.1123/jpah.5.3.398.
Physical activity (PA) counseling is becoming commonplace in primary care settings, although there is a high degree of variation in the quality and quantity of this intervention. The purpose of this review was to examine the theory on which the intervention is based and the level of treatment fidelity applied at all stages of the intervention.
A systematic review was carried out for interventions that reported an element of PA counseling. Results were mapped according to a treatment fidelity framework of intervention design, training, delivery, receipt, and enactment.
Most studies were underpinned by the transtheoretical model. Few studies described the frequency or duration of PA counseling training or competence level of the interventionist. The most common outcome measures were behavioral and physiological, with few studies including a cognitive outcome measure.
Most research focuses on outcome and significance rather than intervention processes, with limited consideration of treatment fidelity. The design, training, delivery, and receipt of PA counseling should be reported more thoroughly.
身体活动(PA)咨询在初级保健机构中日益普遍,尽管这种干预措施在质量和数量上存在很大差异。本综述的目的是研究该干预措施所基于的理论以及在干预各阶段应用的治疗保真度水平。
对报告了PA咨询要素的干预措施进行系统综述。根据干预设计、培训、实施、接受和执行的治疗保真度框架对结果进行梳理。
大多数研究以跨理论模型为基础。很少有研究描述PA咨询培训的频率或持续时间或干预者的能力水平。最常见的结果指标是行为和生理指标,很少有研究纳入认知结果指标。
大多数研究关注结果和意义而非干预过程,对治疗保真度的考虑有限。PA咨询的设计、培训、实施和接受情况应更全面地报告。