Souqiyyeh Muhammad Ziad, Al-Wakeel Jamal, Al-Harbi Ali, Al-Shaebi Fuad, Al-Kanhal Fahd, Mousa Fatimah M, Wahdan Eyad Y, Shaheen Faissal A M
Saudi Center for Organ Transplantation, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl. 2008 Jul;19(4):574-82.
The aim of this study is to analyze the patients' database of the Baxter's Training Peritoneal Dialysis Program (BTPDP) adopted at the Baxter Renal Education Center (BREC), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia in order to determine its effectiveness in the management, compliance, and outcome of the trained peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. The study analyzes the database of the BTPDP, which includes the demographic data, duration of follow-up, complications, and outcome of the patients trained on PD between September 2003 and November 2007. Records of 376 patients with a mean age of 46.0+/-22.6 years were available in the database for analysis. Of them, 187 (49.7%) were males, 312 (82.9%) were trained at the BREC, 315 (83.8%) were new PD patients, and 298 (79.3%) were trained on automated PD (APD). The dropouts during the study period included 172 patients (46%); 42 (24.4%) were transplanted, 45 (26.2%) switched to hemodialysis, 57 (33.1%) died and 28 (16.3%) were lost to follow-up. A comparison was made between the group trained at the BREC and the group trained at the hospital. There was an overwhelming adoption of BTPDP by the different hospitals during the study period (p<0.00001). There were 264 (84.6%) patients trained on APD at the BREC vs. 34 (53.1%) at the hospital (p<0.00001), and the patients trained at the BREC had significantly less dropouts than those trained at the hospital during the study period 135 (43.3%) vs. 38 (59.4%) respectively (p<0.02). The mean period of follow-up was significantly different between the patients trained at the BREC and those trained at the referring hospital (390+/-461 days vs. 679+/-779 days respectively (p<00000.8). Also, there was a trend for better technique survival after the second year, among the patients trained at the BREC. We conclude that the BREC model has increased the recruitment to PD, and helped in spreading this method of renal replacement therapy among patients. This model emphasizes the role of a designated training course by an expert team, and unifies the training standards. Furthermore, application of this model can be expanded nationwide and even to other countries.
本研究旨在分析沙特阿拉伯利雅得百特肾脏教育中心(BREC)采用的百特培训腹膜透析项目(BTPDP)的患者数据库,以确定其在已培训腹膜透析(PD)患者的管理、依从性和治疗结果方面的有效性。该研究分析了BTPDP的数据库,其中包括2003年9月至2007年11月期间接受PD培训患者的人口统计学数据、随访时间、并发症及治疗结果。数据库中有376例患者的记录可供分析,这些患者的平均年龄为46.0±22.6岁。其中,187例(49.7%)为男性,312例(82.9%)在BREC接受培训,315例(83.8%)为新的PD患者,298例(79.3%)接受了自动化腹膜透析(APD)培训。研究期间的退出者包括172例患者(46%);42例(24.4%)接受了移植,45例(26.2%)转为血液透析,57例(33.1%)死亡,28例(16.3%)失访。对在BREC接受培训的组和在医院接受培训的组进行了比较。在研究期间,不同医院对BTPDP的采用率极高(p<0.00001)。在BREC接受APD培训的患者有264例(84.6%),而在医院接受培训的有34例(53.1%)(p<0.00001),且在研究期间,在BREC接受培训的患者退出率显著低于在医院接受培训的患者,分别为135例(43.3%)和38例(59.4%)(p<0.02)。在BREC接受培训的患者和在转诊医院接受培训的患者之间,平均随访时间存在显著差异(分别为390±461天和679±779天(p<0.000008)。此外,在BREC接受培训的患者中,第二年之后技术存活情况有更好的趋势。我们得出结论,BREC模式增加了PD的招募人数,并有助于在患者中推广这种肾脏替代治疗方法。该模式强调了专家团队指定培训课程的作用,并统一了培训标准。此外,这种模式的应用可以在全国范围内甚至推广到其他国家。