Department of Medicine, Kingston Health Sciences Centre, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada.
Department of Biology, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada.
Kidney360. 2020 Sep 8;1(11):1244-1253. doi: 10.34067/KID.0004052020. eCollection 2020 Nov 25.
Dedicated care programs that provide increased support to patients starting dialysis are increasingly being used to reduce the risk of complications. The objectives of this systematic review were to determine the characteristics of existing programs and their effect on patient outcomes.
We searched Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Cochrane CENTRAL, and CINAHL from database inception to November 20, 2019 for English-language studies that evaluated dedicated care programs for adults starting maintenance dialysis in the inpatient or outpatient setting. Any study design was eligible, but we required the presence of a control group and prespecified patient outcomes. We extracted data describing the nature of the interventions, their components, and the reported benefits.
The literature search yielded 12,681 studies. We evaluated 66 full texts and included 11 studies (=6812 intervention patients); eight of the studies evaluated hemodialysis programs. All studies were observational, and there were no randomized controlled trials. The most common interventions included patient education (=11) and case management (=5), with nurses involved in nine programs. The most common outcomes were mortality (=8) and vascular access (=4), with only three studies reporting on the uptake of home dialysis and none on transplantation. We identified four high-quality studies that combined patient education and case management; in these programs, the relative reduction in 90-day mortality ranged from 22% (95% CI, -3% to 41%) to 49% (95% CI, 33% to 61%). Pooled analysis was not possible due to study heterogeneity.
Few studies have evaluated dedicated care programs for patients starting dialysis, especially their effect on home dialysis and transplantation. Whereas multidisciplinary care models that combine patient education with case management appear to be promising, additional prospective studies that involve patients in their design and execution are needed before widespread implementation of these resource-intensive programs.
越来越多的专门护理计划为开始透析的患者提供更多支持,以降低并发症风险。本系统评价的目的是确定现有计划的特点及其对患者结局的影响。
我们从数据库建立之初到 2019 年 11 月 20 日,在 Embase、MEDLINE、Web of Science、Cochrane CENTRAL 和 CINAHL 上检索了评估成人开始维持性透析的住院或门诊环境下的专门护理计划的英语研究。任何研究设计都符合条件,但我们需要有对照组和预设的患者结局。我们提取了描述干预措施性质、组成部分和报告益处的数据。
文献检索得到 12681 项研究。我们评估了 66 篇全文,并纳入了 11 项研究(=6812 例干预患者);其中 8 项研究评估了血液透析计划。所有研究均为观察性研究,无随机对照试验。最常见的干预措施包括患者教育(=11)和病例管理(=5),其中 9 个计划涉及护士。最常见的结局是死亡率(=8)和血管通路(=4),只有 3 项研究报告了家庭透析的采用情况,没有研究报告移植情况。我们确定了 4 项高质量的研究,这些研究将患者教育和病例管理相结合;在这些计划中,90 天死亡率的相对降低范围为 22%(95%CI,-3%至 41%)至 49%(95%CI,33%至 61%)。由于研究的异质性,无法进行汇总分析。
很少有研究评估了开始透析的患者的专门护理计划,特别是这些计划对家庭透析和移植的影响。虽然结合患者教育和病例管理的多学科护理模式似乎很有前景,但在广泛实施这些资源密集型计划之前,需要进行更多涉及患者设计和实施的前瞻性研究。