• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

健康、症状及满意度调查评分中的情境效应

Context effects in survey ratings of health, symptoms, and satisfaction.

作者信息

Stone Arthur A, Broderick Joan E, Schwartz Joseph E, Schwarz Norbert

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York 11994-8790, USA.

出版信息

Med Care. 2008 Jul;46(7):662-7. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181789387.

DOI:10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181789387
PMID:18580384
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2757262/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Survey self-reports of health status, symptoms (pain and fatigue), and life satisfaction often serve as outcomes in clinical trials. Prior studies have shown, however, that such reports can be subject to context effects, which could threaten their validity.

RESEARCH DESIGN

We examined the impact of 2 context effects: the effect of the reporting period associated with a question (No Period Specified; Last Month; Right Now) and the effect of whom the respondent compared themselves to in answering a question (None Specified; Compared with Others in the US; Compared with 20-Year-Olds).

RESULTS

One thousand four hundred seventy-one community adults aged 20 through 70 years, who were members of an internet panel, responded to 1 of 9 questionnaires formed by crossing the 2 context variables. A significant effect of Reporting Period was observed indicating that higher levels of Pain and Fatigue were associated with the 1-Month reporting period. When no reporting period was specified, symptom levels were equivalent to the Right Now levels of symptoms. Reporting Period had no effect on the other outcomes. Educational level did not interact with these main effects, with 1 exception. None of the predicted effects were found for Comparison Group, although Pain was significantly associated with this factor.

CONCLUSIONS

Reporting period in survey questions is a factor that influences responses and should be considered by survey researchers in their study designs.

摘要

背景

健康状况、症状(疼痛和疲劳)及生活满意度的调查自我报告常作为临床试验的结果。然而,先前的研究表明,此类报告可能会受到情境效应的影响,这可能会威胁到其有效性。

研究设计

我们研究了两种情境效应的影响:与问题相关的报告期效应(未指定时期;上个月;此刻)以及回答问题时被调查者将自己与谁进行比较的效应(未指定;与美国其他人比较;与20岁的人比较)。

结果

1471名年龄在20至70岁之间的社区成年人,他们是一个互联网小组的成员,对通过交叉这两个情境变量形成的9份问卷中的1份做出了回应。观察到报告期有显著效应,表明疼痛和疲劳程度较高与1个月的报告期相关。当未指定报告期时,症状水平与此刻的症状水平相当。报告期对其他结果没有影响。教育水平与这些主要效应没有相互作用,但有一个例外。比较组未发现任何预测效应,尽管疼痛与该因素显著相关。

结论

调查问卷中的报告期是影响回答的一个因素,调查研究人员在研究设计中应予以考虑。

相似文献

1
Context effects in survey ratings of health, symptoms, and satisfaction.健康、症状及满意度调查评分中的情境效应
Med Care. 2008 Jul;46(7):662-7. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181789387.
2
Do 360-degree feedback survey results relate to patient satisfaction measures?360度反馈调查结果与患者满意度指标有关吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 May;473(5):1590-7. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3981-3.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Patient perceptions of pain management therapy: a comparison of real-time assessment of patient education and satisfaction and registered nurse perceptions.患者对疼痛管理治疗的认知:患者教育与满意度实时评估与注册护士认知的比较
Pain Manag Nurs. 2012 Dec;13(4):186-93. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2010.04.004. Epub 2010 Dec 18.
5
The effect of different sampling and recall periods in the CAHPS Clinician & Group (CG-CAHPS) survey.CAHPS 临床医生和小组(CG-CAHPS)调查中不同抽样和回忆周期的影响。
Health Serv Res. 2019 Oct;54(5):1036-1044. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13173. Epub 2019 May 27.
6
An evaluation of the impact of nonresponse bias on patient satisfaction surveys.无应答偏倚对患者满意度调查影响的评估。
Med Care. 1997 Jun;35(6):646-52. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199706000-00009.
7
The measurement of patients' expectations for health care: a review and psychometric testing of a measure of patients' expectations.患者对医疗保健期望的测量:对患者期望测量的综述和心理测量学测试。
Health Technol Assess. 2012 Jul;16(30):i-xii, 1-509. doi: 10.3310/hta16300.
8
Methodological challenges associated with patient responses to follow-up longitudinal surveys regarding quality of care.与患者对有关医疗质量的随访纵向调查的回应相关的方法学挑战。
Health Serv Res. 2003 Dec;38(6 Pt 1):1579-98. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2003.00194.x.
9
Web-based emergency department patient satisfaction surveys may introduce potential for bias.
J Emerg Med. 2014 Mar;46(3):404-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2013.08.077. Epub 2013 Nov 15.
10
A comparison of a postal survey and mixed-mode survey using a questionnaire on patients' experiences with breast care.一项关于使用患者乳腺护理体验问卷的邮寄调查与混合模式调查的比较。
J Med Internet Res. 2011 Sep 27;13(3):e68. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1241.

引用本文的文献

1
Systematic Review of the Effect of a One-Day Versus Seven-Day Recall Duration on Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs).一天与七天回忆间隔对患者报告结局测量(PROMs)效果的系统评价。
Patient. 2023 May;16(3):201-221. doi: 10.1007/s40271-022-00611-w. Epub 2023 Feb 14.
2
Vague quantifiers demonstrate little susceptibility to frame of reference effects.模糊量词对参照系效应的敏感度较低。
Appl Res Qual Life. 2022 Feb;17(1):317-331. doi: 10.1007/s11482-020-09889-0. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
3
Shedding Light on SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19, COVID-19 Vaccination, and Auditory Symptoms: Causality or Spurious Conjunction?阐明 SARS-CoV-2、COVID-19、COVID-19 疫苗接种和听觉症状之间的关系:是因果关系还是偶然关联?
Front Public Health. 2022 Feb 22;10:837513. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.837513. eCollection 2022.
4
Explaining age differences in the memory-experience gap.解释记忆体验差距中的年龄差异。
Psychol Aging. 2021 Sep;36(6):679-693. doi: 10.1037/pag0000628.
5
Patient Perspectives With Telehealth Visits in Cardiology During COVID-19: Online Patient Survey Study.COVID-19期间心脏病学远程医疗就诊的患者观点:在线患者调查研究
JMIR Cardio. 2021 Jan 22;5(1):e25074. doi: 10.2196/25074.
6
Age Effects of Frames of Reference in Self-reports of Health, Well-being, Fatigue and Pain.健康、幸福、疲劳和疼痛自我报告中参照框架的年龄效应
Appl Res Qual Life. 2020 Mar;15(1):35-54. doi: 10.1007/s11482-018-9663-7. Epub 2018 Dec 3.
7
Epidemiology of Perceived Physical Fatigability in Older Adults: The Long Life Family Study.老年人感知体力疲劳的流行病学:长寿家庭研究。
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2020 Sep 16;75(9):e81-e88. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glz288.
8
Validation of the Pittsburgh Fatigability Scale in a mixed sample of adults with and without chronic conditions.在患有和不患有慢性疾病的成年人混合样本中验证匹兹堡疲劳量表。
J Health Psychol. 2021 Aug;26(9):1455-1467. doi: 10.1177/1359105319877448. Epub 2019 Sep 18.
9
Do people with arthritis differ from healthy controls in their internal comparison standards for self-reports of health, fatigue, and pain?患有关节炎的人与健康对照组在自我报告健康、疲劳和疼痛时的内部比较标准上是否存在差异?
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2019 Mar 27;3(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s41687-019-0108-3.
10
Frames of Reference in Self-Reports of Health, Well-being, Fatigue, and Pain: A Qualitative Examination.健康、幸福、疲劳和疼痛自我报告中的参照框架:一项定性研究
Appl Res Qual Life. 2018 Sep;13(3):585-601. doi: 10.1007/s11482-017-9546-3. Epub 2017 Jul 6.

本文引用的文献

1
What is perfect health to an 85-year-old?: evidence for scale recalibration in subjective health ratings.对一位85岁的老人来说,完美健康意味着什么?:主观健康评分中尺度重新校准的证据。
Med Care. 2005 Oct;43(10):1054-7. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000178193.38413.70.
2
Variability of momentary pain predicts recall of weekly pain: a consequence of the peak (or salience) memory heuristic.瞬间疼痛的变异性可预测每周疼痛的回忆:峰值(或显著性)记忆启发式的结果。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2005 Oct;31(10):1340-6. doi: 10.1177/0146167205275615.
3
Looking back at anger: reference periods change the interpretation of emotion frequency questions.回顾愤怒情绪:参考时期会改变对情绪频率问题的解读。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998 Sep;75(3):719-28. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.75.3.719.
4
Measuring fatigue and other anemia-related symptoms with the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) measurement system.使用癌症治疗功能评估(FACT)测量系统来测量疲劳及其他与贫血相关的症状。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 1997 Feb;13(2):63-74. doi: 10.1016/s0885-3924(96)00274-6.
5
Subjective well-being.主观幸福感
Psychol Bull. 1984 May;95(3):542-75.
6
The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection.医学结局研究36项简明健康调查(SF-36)。I.概念框架与条目选择。
Med Care. 1992 Jun;30(6):473-83.