Suppr超能文献

健康、症状及满意度调查评分中的情境效应

Context effects in survey ratings of health, symptoms, and satisfaction.

作者信息

Stone Arthur A, Broderick Joan E, Schwartz Joseph E, Schwarz Norbert

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York 11994-8790, USA.

出版信息

Med Care. 2008 Jul;46(7):662-7. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181789387.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Survey self-reports of health status, symptoms (pain and fatigue), and life satisfaction often serve as outcomes in clinical trials. Prior studies have shown, however, that such reports can be subject to context effects, which could threaten their validity.

RESEARCH DESIGN

We examined the impact of 2 context effects: the effect of the reporting period associated with a question (No Period Specified; Last Month; Right Now) and the effect of whom the respondent compared themselves to in answering a question (None Specified; Compared with Others in the US; Compared with 20-Year-Olds).

RESULTS

One thousand four hundred seventy-one community adults aged 20 through 70 years, who were members of an internet panel, responded to 1 of 9 questionnaires formed by crossing the 2 context variables. A significant effect of Reporting Period was observed indicating that higher levels of Pain and Fatigue were associated with the 1-Month reporting period. When no reporting period was specified, symptom levels were equivalent to the Right Now levels of symptoms. Reporting Period had no effect on the other outcomes. Educational level did not interact with these main effects, with 1 exception. None of the predicted effects were found for Comparison Group, although Pain was significantly associated with this factor.

CONCLUSIONS

Reporting period in survey questions is a factor that influences responses and should be considered by survey researchers in their study designs.

摘要

背景

健康状况、症状(疼痛和疲劳)及生活满意度的调查自我报告常作为临床试验的结果。然而,先前的研究表明,此类报告可能会受到情境效应的影响,这可能会威胁到其有效性。

研究设计

我们研究了两种情境效应的影响:与问题相关的报告期效应(未指定时期;上个月;此刻)以及回答问题时被调查者将自己与谁进行比较的效应(未指定;与美国其他人比较;与20岁的人比较)。

结果

1471名年龄在20至70岁之间的社区成年人,他们是一个互联网小组的成员,对通过交叉这两个情境变量形成的9份问卷中的1份做出了回应。观察到报告期有显著效应,表明疼痛和疲劳程度较高与1个月的报告期相关。当未指定报告期时,症状水平与此刻的症状水平相当。报告期对其他结果没有影响。教育水平与这些主要效应没有相互作用,但有一个例外。比较组未发现任何预测效应,尽管疼痛与该因素显著相关。

结论

调查问卷中的报告期是影响回答的一个因素,调查研究人员在研究设计中应予以考虑。

相似文献

1
Context effects in survey ratings of health, symptoms, and satisfaction.
Med Care. 2008 Jul;46(7):662-7. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181789387.
2
Do 360-degree feedback survey results relate to patient satisfaction measures?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 May;473(5):1590-7. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3981-3.
5
The effect of different sampling and recall periods in the CAHPS Clinician & Group (CG-CAHPS) survey.
Health Serv Res. 2019 Oct;54(5):1036-1044. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13173. Epub 2019 May 27.
6
An evaluation of the impact of nonresponse bias on patient satisfaction surveys.
Med Care. 1997 Jun;35(6):646-52. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199706000-00009.
8
Methodological challenges associated with patient responses to follow-up longitudinal surveys regarding quality of care.
Health Serv Res. 2003 Dec;38(6 Pt 1):1579-98. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2003.00194.x.
9
Web-based emergency department patient satisfaction surveys may introduce potential for bias.
J Emerg Med. 2014 Mar;46(3):404-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2013.08.077. Epub 2013 Nov 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Systematic Review of the Effect of a One-Day Versus Seven-Day Recall Duration on Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs).
Patient. 2023 May;16(3):201-221. doi: 10.1007/s40271-022-00611-w. Epub 2023 Feb 14.
2
Vague quantifiers demonstrate little susceptibility to frame of reference effects.
Appl Res Qual Life. 2022 Feb;17(1):317-331. doi: 10.1007/s11482-020-09889-0. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
3
Shedding Light on SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19, COVID-19 Vaccination, and Auditory Symptoms: Causality or Spurious Conjunction?
Front Public Health. 2022 Feb 22;10:837513. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.837513. eCollection 2022.
4
Explaining age differences in the memory-experience gap.
Psychol Aging. 2021 Sep;36(6):679-693. doi: 10.1037/pag0000628.
6
Age Effects of Frames of Reference in Self-reports of Health, Well-being, Fatigue and Pain.
Appl Res Qual Life. 2020 Mar;15(1):35-54. doi: 10.1007/s11482-018-9663-7. Epub 2018 Dec 3.
7
Epidemiology of Perceived Physical Fatigability in Older Adults: The Long Life Family Study.
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2020 Sep 16;75(9):e81-e88. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glz288.
8
Validation of the Pittsburgh Fatigability Scale in a mixed sample of adults with and without chronic conditions.
J Health Psychol. 2021 Aug;26(9):1455-1467. doi: 10.1177/1359105319877448. Epub 2019 Sep 18.
10
Frames of Reference in Self-Reports of Health, Well-being, Fatigue, and Pain: A Qualitative Examination.
Appl Res Qual Life. 2018 Sep;13(3):585-601. doi: 10.1007/s11482-017-9546-3. Epub 2017 Jul 6.

本文引用的文献

1
What is perfect health to an 85-year-old?: evidence for scale recalibration in subjective health ratings.
Med Care. 2005 Oct;43(10):1054-7. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000178193.38413.70.
3
Looking back at anger: reference periods change the interpretation of emotion frequency questions.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998 Sep;75(3):719-28. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.75.3.719.
5
Subjective well-being.
Psychol Bull. 1984 May;95(3):542-75.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验