Kurihara Shuichi, Oda Yoshinao, Ohishi Yoshihiro, Iwasa Atsuko, Takahira Tomonari, Kaneki Eisuke, Kobayashi Hiroaki, Wake Norio, Tsuneyoshi Masazumi
Department of Anatomic Pathology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Maidashi 3-1-1, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, Japan.
Am J Surg Pathol. 2008 Aug;32(8):1228-38. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e31816a3b42.
Classification and terminology of non-low-grade endometrial sarcomas, which show significant nuclear atypia, have been controversial. Currently, these tumors seem to be classified all together into "undifferentiated endometrial sarcoma (UES)." However, it remains unclear whether these non-low-grade sarcomas are universally "undifferentiated." We divided these sarcomas morphologically into undifferentiated endometrial sarcoma with nuclear uniformity (UES-U) and undifferentiated endometrial sarcoma with nuclear pleomorphism (UES-P), and compared their molecular genetic and immunohistochemical profiles. Eighteen low-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas (ESS-LG), 7 UES-U, and 6 UES-P were examined. All the patients with ESS-LG were still alive, either with or without disease, whereas 4 of the 5 patients with advanced stage UES-U and all 3 of the patients with advanced stage UES-P had died of the disease. JAZF1-JJAZ1 fusion transcript was detected in 6 (50%) out of 12 ESS-LG and in 1 (33%) of 3 UES-U, whereas it was not detected in any of the cases of UES-P. ESS-LG and UES-U frequently showed positive immunoreaction for estrogen receptor (ESS-LG: 94%, UES-U: 57%) and progesterone receptor (ESS-LG: 94%, UES-U: 57%), whereas all the UES-P were negative for these receptors. Nuclear beta-catenin expression was more frequently recognized in ESS-LG (47%) and UES-U (85%), compared with UES-P (33%). Moreover, nuclear accumulation of p53 and TP53 gene missense mutations were limited to 3 UES-P cases. Our data suggest that UES-U shares some molecular genetic and immunohistochemical characteristics with ESS-LG, but UES-P considerably differs from ESS-LG.
具有明显核异型性的非低级别子宫内膜肉瘤的分类和术语一直存在争议。目前,这些肿瘤似乎都被归为“未分化子宫内膜肉瘤(UES)”。然而,这些非低级别肉瘤是否普遍“未分化”仍不清楚。我们将这些肉瘤在形态学上分为核一致的未分化子宫内膜肉瘤(UES-U)和核多形性的未分化子宫内膜肉瘤(UES-P),并比较它们的分子遗传学和免疫组化特征。研究了18例低级别子宫内膜间质肉瘤(ESS-LG)、7例UES-U和6例UES-P。所有ESS-LG患者均存活,无论有无疾病,而5例晚期UES-U患者中有4例以及3例晚期UES-P患者全部死于该疾病。在12例ESS-LG中的6例(50%)和3例UES-U中的1例(33%)检测到JAZF1-JJAZ1融合转录本,而在任何UES-P病例中均未检测到。ESS-LG和UES-U对雌激素受体(ESS-LG:94%,UES-U:57%)和孕激素受体(ESS-LG:94%,UES-U:57%)常呈阳性免疫反应,而所有UES-P对这些受体均为阴性。与UES-P(33%)相比,ESS-LG(47%)和UES-U(85%)中核β-连环蛋白表达更常见。此外,p53核聚集和TP53基因错义突变仅限于3例UES-P病例。我们的数据表明,UES-U与ESS-LG具有一些分子遗传学和免疫组化特征,但UES-P与ESS-LG有很大不同。