• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹主动脉瘤血管内修复术后的纵向结果。

Longitudinal outcomes after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms.

作者信息

Vogel T R, Symons R G, Flum D R

机构信息

Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Division of Vascular Surgery, New Brunswick, New Jersey 08903-0019, USA.

出版信息

Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2008 Oct-Nov;42(5):412-9. doi: 10.1177/1538574408316143. Epub 2008 Jun 25.

DOI:10.1177/1538574408316143
PMID:18583307
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Endovascular abdominal aneurysm repair (EVAR) is increasingly used, but there is insufficient evaluation of long-term outcomes.

METHOD

Retrospective cohort study using the linked Washington State hospital discharge database.

RESULT

3,350 patients underwent elective repair of AAA (1181 EVAR) between 2000 and 2005. EVAR patients were older and had higher comorbidity scores. The 30-day readmission rate after EVAR was 11.6%. The 30-day readmissions included cardiac complications (18.5%) and device complications (10.4%). 46% of the 30-day readmissions after EVAR underwent procedures: abdominal/ iliac angiography (7.4%), angioplasty (8.9%), and device revision (8.2%). Mean time to late interventions was 611 days.

CONCLUSION

Readmission, reintervention, and complication rates after EVAR occur more commonly than previously described. Cardiac complications were the most common readmission. Almost half of the 30-day readmissions required a secondary intervention. Long-term complications after EVAR occurred before two years. Population-based assessment may be more reflective of "real world" complication rates after EVAR.

摘要

目的

血管内腹主动脉瘤修复术(EVAR)的应用越来越广泛,但对其长期疗效的评估尚不充分。

方法

利用华盛顿州医院出院数据库进行回顾性队列研究。

结果

2000年至2005年间,3350例患者接受了腹主动脉瘤择期修复术(1181例行EVAR)。接受EVAR的患者年龄更大,合并症评分更高。EVAR术后30天再入院率为11.6%。30天再入院的原因包括心脏并发症(18.5%)和器械并发症(10.4%)。EVAR术后30天再入院患者中有46%接受了手术:腹主动脉/髂动脉血管造影(7.4%)、血管成形术(8.9%)和器械翻修(8.2%)。晚期干预的平均时间为611天。

结论

EVAR术后的再入院、再次干预和并发症发生率比之前报道的更为常见。心脏并发症是最常见的再入院原因。30天再入院患者中近一半需要二次干预。EVAR术后的长期并发症发生在两年之前。基于人群的评估可能更能反映EVAR术后的“真实世界”并发症发生率。

相似文献

1
Longitudinal outcomes after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms.腹主动脉瘤血管内修复术后的纵向结果。
Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2008 Oct-Nov;42(5):412-9. doi: 10.1177/1538574408316143. Epub 2008 Jun 25.
2
Endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in high risk patients: outcomes of management.高危患者的腹主动脉瘤腔内修复术:治疗结果
J Med Assoc Thai. 2007 Oct;90(10):2080-9.
3
Re-interventions, readmissions and discharge destination: modern metrics for the assessment of the quality of care.再介入、再入院和出院去向:评估护理质量的现代指标。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2010 Jan;39(1):49-54. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2009.10.003. Epub 2009 Oct 30.
4
Improving results of elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair at a low-volume hospital by risk-adjusted selection of treatment in the endovascular era.在血管内治疗时代,通过风险调整后的治疗选择来提高低容量医院择期腹主动脉瘤修复的效果。
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2009 Sep;32(5):918-22. doi: 10.1007/s00270-009-9538-2. Epub 2009 Mar 19.
5
Matched-pair analysis of endovascular versus open surgical repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms in young patients at low risk.低风险年轻患者腹主动脉瘤血管内修复与开放手术修复的配对分析。
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2008 May;19(5):645-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2007.12.445. Epub 2008 Mar 14.
6
A comparison of the mid-term results following the use of bifurcated and aorto-uni-iliac devices in the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms.分叉型和主动脉-单侧髂动脉装置用于治疗腹主动脉瘤的中期结果比较。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2009 Sep;38(3):298-304. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2009.06.004. Epub 2009 Jul 16.
7
Changing indications and outcomes for open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair since the advent of endovascular repair.自血管腔内修复技术出现以来,开放性腹主动脉瘤修复术的适应证及治疗结果的变化
Am Surg. 2009 Aug;75(8):665-9; discussion 669-70.
8
Cost and effectiveness comparison of endovascular aneurysm repair versus open surgical repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: a single-center experience.腹主动脉瘤血管内修复术与开放手术修复术的成本效益比较:单中心经验
J Vasc Nurs. 2008 Mar;26(1):15-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jvn.2007.10.003.
9
Elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: relationship of hospital teaching status to repair type, resource use, and outcomes.择期腹主动脉瘤修复术:医院教学状况与修复类型、资源利用及预后的关系。
J Am Coll Surg. 2009 Sep;209(3):356-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.05.024. Epub 2009 Jul 24.
10
Conversion to open repair after endovascular aneurysm repair: causes and results. A French multicentric study.血管内动脉瘤修复术后转为开放修复术:原因与结果。一项法国多中心研究。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2009 Oct;38(4):429-34. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2009.06.001. Epub 2009 Jul 9.

引用本文的文献

1
General and vascular surgery readmissions: a systematic review.普通外科和血管外科再入院情况:一项系统评价
J Am Coll Surg. 2014 Sep;219(3):552-69.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.05.007. Epub 2014 May 22.
2
Risk factors for readmission after lower extremity bypass in the American College of Surgeons National Surgery Quality Improvement Program.美国外科医师学院国家手术质量改进计划中下肢旁路手术后再入院的风险因素。
J Vasc Surg. 2014 May;59(5):1331-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2013.12.032. Epub 2014 Jan 31.
3
Causes and implications of readmission after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.
腹主动脉瘤修复术后再入院的原因和影响。
Ann Surg. 2012 Oct;256(4):595-605. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31826b4bfe.