Suppr超能文献

不同腰椎棘突间植入物对灵活性和椎间盘内压力的生物力学影响。

Biomechanical effect of different lumbar interspinous implants on flexibility and intradiscal pressure.

作者信息

Wilke Hans-Joachim, Drumm J, Häussler K, Mack C, Steudel W-I, Kettler A

机构信息

Institute of Orthopaedic Research and Biomechanics (Director: L. Claes), University of Ulm, Helmholtzstrasse 14, 89081, Ulm, Germany.

出版信息

Eur Spine J. 2008 Aug;17(8):1049-56. doi: 10.1007/s00586-008-0657-2. Epub 2008 Jun 27.

Abstract

Interspinous implants are used to treat lumbar spinal stenosis or facet joint arthritis. The aims of implanting interspinous devices are to unload the facet joints, restore foraminal height and provide stability especially in extension but still allow motion. The aim of this in vitro study was to compare four different interspinous implants--Colfex, Wallis, Diam and X-Stop--in terms of their three-dimensional flexibility and the intradiscal pressure. Twenty-four human lumbar spine specimens were divided into four equal groups and tested with pure moments in flexion/extension, lateral bending and axial rotation: (1) intact, (2) defect, (3) after implantation. Range of motion and the intradiscal pressure were determined. In each implant-group the defect caused an increase in range of motion by about 8% in lateral bending to 18% in axial rotation. Implantation had similar effects with all four implants. In extension, Coflex, Wallis, Diam, and X-Stop all overcompensated the instability caused by the defect and allowed about 50% of the range of motion of the intact state. In contrast, in flexion, lateral bending and axial rotation the values of the range of motion stayed about the values of the defect state. Similarly the intradiscal pressure after implantation was similar to that of the intact specimens in flexion, lateral bending and axial rotation but much smaller during extension. All tested interspinous implants had a similar effect on the flexibility: they strongly stabilized and reduced the intradiscal pressure in extension, but had almost no effect in flexion, lateral bending and axial rotation.

摘要

棘突间植入物用于治疗腰椎管狭窄症或小关节关节炎。植入棘突间装置的目的是减轻小关节的负荷,恢复椎间孔高度,并提供稳定性,尤其是在伸展时,但仍允许运动。本体外研究的目的是比较四种不同的棘突间植入物——Colfex、Wallis、Diam和X-Stop——在三维灵活性和椎间盘内压力方面的差异。将24个人类腰椎标本分成四组相等的样本,并在屈伸、侧弯和轴向旋转时施加纯力矩进行测试:(1)完整状态,(2)缺损状态,(3)植入后状态。测定运动范围和椎间盘内压力。在每个植入物组中,缺损导致侧弯时运动范围增加约8%,轴向旋转时增加18%。四种植入物的植入效果相似。在伸展时,Coflex、Wallis、Diam和X-Stop都过度补偿了缺损导致的不稳定性,并允许达到完整状态运动范围的约50%。相比之下,在屈曲、侧弯和轴向旋转时,运动范围的值与缺损状态时的值大致相同。同样,植入后的椎间盘内压力在屈伸、侧弯和轴向旋转时与完整标本相似,但在伸展时要小得多。所有测试的棘突间植入物对灵活性的影响相似:它们在伸展时能强烈稳定并降低椎间盘内压力,但在屈曲、侧弯和轴向旋转时几乎没有影响。

相似文献

1
Biomechanical effect of different lumbar interspinous implants on flexibility and intradiscal pressure.
Eur Spine J. 2008 Aug;17(8):1049-56. doi: 10.1007/s00586-008-0657-2. Epub 2008 Jun 27.
2
[Biomechanics of interspinous spacers].
Orthopade. 2010 Jun;39(6):565-72. doi: 10.1007/s00132-009-1587-3.
3
Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: the effect of various instrumentation techniques on the flexibility of the lumbar spine.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Feb 15;29(4):E65-70. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000113034.74567.86.
4
Can a modified interspinous spacer prevent instability in axial rotation and lateral bending? A biomechanical in vitro study resulting in a new idea.
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2008 Feb;23(2):242-7. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2007.09.004. Epub 2007 Nov 5.
5
Biomechanical evaluation of a new total posterior-element replacement system.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Nov 15;31(24):2790-6; discussion 2797. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000245872.45554.c0.
6
Biomechanics of posterior dynamic stabilizing device (DIAM) after facetectomy and discectomy.
Spine J. 2006 Nov-Dec;6(6):714-22. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2006.02.003.
7
The use of an interspinous implant in conjunction with a graded facetectomy procedure.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Jun 1;30(11):1266-72; discussion 1273-4. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000164152.32734.d2.

引用本文的文献

1
A finite element study of the effect of cross-link stabilisation in a lumbar spine tumour model.
Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2025 Jul;239(7):607-623. doi: 10.1177/09544119251348279. Epub 2025 Jul 7.
5
Bibliometric analysis of interspinous device in treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Mar 1;103(9):e37351. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000037351.
9
Development and validation of lumbar spine finite element model.
PeerJ. 2023 Aug 11;11:e15805. doi: 10.7717/peerj.15805. eCollection 2023.
10
The effect of lifting load on the kinematic characteristics of lumbar spinous process in vivo.
Surg Radiol Anat. 2023 Jun;45(6):699-708. doi: 10.1007/s00276-023-03135-6. Epub 2023 Apr 3.

本文引用的文献

1
Are the spines of calf, pig and sheep suitable models for pre-clinical implant tests?
Eur Spine J. 2007 Dec;16(12):2186-92. doi: 10.1007/s00586-007-0485-9. Epub 2007 Aug 25.
4
Dynamic interspinous process technology.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Aug 15;30(16 Suppl):S73-8. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000174532.58468.6c.
5
The effect of an interspinous process implant on facet loading during extension.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Apr 15;30(8):903-7. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000158876.51771.f8.
6
The effects of an interspinous implant on the kinematics of the instrumented and adjacent levels in the lumbar spine.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Oct 1;28(19):2192-7. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000084877.88192.8E.
7
The effect of an interspinous implant on intervertebral disc pressures.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Aug 15;28(16):1906-7; author reply 1907-8. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000084662.02029.B2.
8
Dynamic stabilization of the lumbar spine and its effects on adjacent segments: an in vitro experiment.
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2003 Aug;16(4):418-23. doi: 10.1097/00024720-200308000-00015.
9
The effects of an interspinous implant on intervertebral disc pressures.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Jan 1;28(1):26-32. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200301010-00008.
10

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验