Abbattista T, Ridolfi F, Ciabattoni E, Marini F, Bendia E, Brunelli E, Busilacchi P
Unità di Radiologia, SIUMB Ultrasound School, Ospedale Civile di Senigallia, Via Cellini 1, Senigallia, Italy.
Radiol Med. 2008 Sep;113(6):860-74. doi: 10.1007/s11547-008-0292-3. Epub 2008 Jun 27.
The aims of this prospective study were to evaluate analysis of sulfur-hexafluoride-filled microbubble contrast agent (Sonovue) transit times as a tool for differentiating liver cirrhosis from the noncirrhotic stage of liver disease and to compare its performance with that of conventional B-mode and Doppler ultrasonography (US).
Contrast-enhanced hepatic ultrasonography with the US contrast agent Sonovue was performed on 38 patients with diagnoses of hepatic cirrhosis based on unequivocal clinical signs or liver biopsy findings (Child-Pugh classes A in 19, B in 16 and C in three), 31 patients with noncirrhotic diffuse liver disease (biopsy confirmed) and 14 controls without diffuse liver disease. Time curves of hepatic-vein signal intensity were analysed using objective criteria to determine the time of enhancement onset (hepatic-vein arrival time) and peak enhancement (hepatic-vein peak enhancement). Accuracy in diagnosing cirrhosis was compared with that based on B-mode and Doppler data.
Hepatic-vein arrival time in cirrhotic patients was significantly shorter (p < 0.01) than in noncirrhotic (chronic liver disease and controls) patients. Peak enhancement times in these three groups were not significantly different. An arrival-time cutoff of 17 s distinguished cirrhotic from noncirrhotic patients with high accuracy (100% sensitivity, 93.3% specificity, positive and negative predictive values 92.6% and 100%, respectively) and excellent reproducibility (kappa coefficients of 1.0 and 0.93 for intraand interobserver agreement). Contrast-enhanced US showed better sensitivity than the B-mode and Doppler data.
Analysis of the time of onset of US contrast enhancement of the hepatic vein appears to be a potentially useful noninvasive supplement to conventional sonography and Doppler in the follow-up of patients with chronic diffuse liver disease.
本前瞻性研究的目的是评估六氟化硫微泡造影剂(声诺维)通过时间分析作为区分肝硬化与非肝硬化阶段肝病的工具,并将其性能与传统B型和多普勒超声检查(US)进行比较。
对38例根据明确临床体征或肝活检结果诊断为肝硬化的患者(Child-Pugh A级19例、B级16例、C级3例)、31例非肝硬化性弥漫性肝病患者(活检确诊)和14例无弥漫性肝病的对照者进行了使用超声造影剂声诺维的肝脏超声造影检查。使用客观标准分析肝静脉信号强度的时间曲线,以确定增强开始时间(肝静脉到达时间)和峰值增强(肝静脉峰值增强)。将诊断肝硬化的准确性与基于B型和多普勒数据的准确性进行比较。
肝硬化患者的肝静脉到达时间明显短于非肝硬化患者(慢性肝病患者和对照者)(p<0.01)。这三组的峰值增强时间无显著差异。以17秒的到达时间为临界值可高度准确地区分肝硬化患者与非肝硬化患者(敏感性100%,特异性93.3%,阳性和阴性预测值分别为92.6%和100%),且具有良好的可重复性(观察者内和观察者间一致性的kappa系数分别为1.0和0.93)。超声造影显示出比B型和多普勒数据更好的敏感性。
肝静脉超声造影增强开始时间的分析似乎是慢性弥漫性肝病患者随访中对传统超声和多普勒检查的一种潜在有用的非侵入性补充。