Saxton Matthew
Department of Psychology and Human Development, Institute of Education, University of London, London, UK.
J Child Lang. 2008 Aug;35(3):677-86. doi: 10.1017/S0305000907008562.
This article reviews the proliferation of terms that have been coined to denote the language environment of the young child. It is argued that terms are often deployed by researchers without due consideration of their appropriateness for particular empirical studies. It is further suggested that just three of the dozen or more available terms meet the needs of child language researchers in most instances: CHILD-DIRECTED SPEECH, INFANT-DIRECTED SPEECH AND EXPOSURE LANGUAGE. The phenomena denoted by these terms are then considered. The term register is generally borrowed for this purpose from sociolinguistics. However, close inspection of this concept reveals that the notion of register needs to be constrained, in specified ways, in order to be of any real value within the field of child language research.
本文回顾了为表示幼儿语言环境而创造的大量术语。有人认为,研究人员经常使用这些术语,却没有充分考虑它们是否适用于特定的实证研究。进一步表明,在大多数情况下,十几个或更多可用术语中只有三个能满足儿童语言研究人员的需求:儿童指向性言语、婴儿指向性言语和接触性语言。接着考虑了这些术语所表示的现象。术语“语域”通常是为此目的从社会语言学中借用的。然而,仔细审视这个概念会发现,为了在儿童语言研究领域具有任何实际价值,语域的概念需要以特定方式加以限制。