Raghu G, Depaso W J, Cain K, Hammar S P, Wetzel C E, Dreis D F, Hutchinson J, Pardee N E, Winterbauer R H
Department of Medicine, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle.
Am Rev Respir Dis. 1991 Aug;144(2):291-6. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/144.2.291.
Twenty-seven newly diagnosed patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) who were previously untreated for IPF were enrolled in a prospective, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study to compare the therapeutic effect of combined prednisone/azathioprine (n = 14) with prednisone plus placebo (n = 13). Prednisone was started at 1.5 mg/kg/day (not to exceed 100 mg/day) for the first 2 wk followed by a biweekly taper to a maintenance dose of 20 mg/day. Azathioprine was administered at a daily dose of 3 mg/kg (not to exceed 200 mg/day). The patients tolerated the use of azathioprine well with few associated side effects. Changes in lung function at 1 yr, as measured by resting alveolar-arterial oxygen difference P[A-a]O2, FVC, and single breath diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCOSB), were all somewhat better in the azathioprine/prednisone group compared with the prednisone alone group, although none of these comparisons were statistically significant. Six of 14 (43%) patients randomized to prednisone plus azathioprine died during the 9-yr follow-up period, compared with 10 of 13 (77%) patients randomized to prednisone plus placebo. A Cox model survival analysis shows a nonsignificant but potentially large survival advantage for azathioprine/prednisone (hazard ratio 0.48, with 95% confidence interval increasing from 0.17 to 1.38). When adjusted for age, the survival advantage of azathioprine/prednisone becomes marginally significant (hazard ratio 0.26, with 95% confidence interval increasing from 0.08 to 0.88; p = 0.02 by large sample approximation, p = 0.05 by randomization test). We conclude that combined prednisone and azathioprine is a safe and possibly effective regimen for the treatment of IPF.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
27例新诊断的特发性肺纤维化(IPF)患者,此前未接受过IPF治疗,被纳入一项前瞻性、双盲、随机、安慰剂对照研究,以比较泼尼松/硫唑嘌呤联合治疗(n = 14)与泼尼松加安慰剂治疗(n = 13)的疗效。泼尼松在前2周开始时剂量为1.5 mg/kg/天(不超过100 mg/天),随后每两周逐渐减量至维持剂量20 mg/天。硫唑嘌呤的每日剂量为3 mg/kg(不超过200 mg/天)。患者对硫唑嘌呤的使用耐受性良好,相关副作用较少。与单独使用泼尼松组相比,硫唑嘌呤/泼尼松组在1年时的肺功能变化,通过静息肺泡-动脉氧分压差P[A-a]O2、用力肺活量(FVC)和单次呼吸一氧化碳弥散量(DLCOSB)测量,均略有改善,尽管这些比较均无统计学意义。在9年的随访期内,随机接受泼尼松加硫唑嘌呤治疗的14例患者中有6例(43%)死亡,而随机接受泼尼松加安慰剂治疗的13例患者中有10例(77%)死亡。Cox模型生存分析显示,硫唑嘌呤/泼尼松有非显著但可能较大的生存优势(风险比0.48,95%置信区间从0.17至1.38)。调整年龄后,硫唑嘌呤/泼尼松的生存优势变得略微显著(风险比0.26,95%置信区间从0.08至0.88;大样本近似法p = 0.02,随机化检验p = 0.05)。我们得出结论,泼尼松和硫唑嘌呤联合治疗是一种治疗IPF的安全且可能有效的方案。(摘要截断于250字)