Matics Zsombor, Bardóczi Anna, Galkó Csongor, Szabó Bence, Gede Noémi, Molnár Zsolt, Duray Gábor, Turan Caner, Hegyi Péter, Horváth Gábor, Müller Veronika
Department of Pulmonology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Centre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
EClinicalMedicine. 2024 Dec 5;79:102966. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102966. eCollection 2025 Jan.
Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a progressive, deadly lung disease with several factors, including respiratory tract infections (RTI), for disease worsening. There's no comprehensive data on RTI incidence in IPF patients across different therapies, including antifibrotic (nintedanib or pirfenidone), investigative or placebo treatments.
A systematic search of databases Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Central, Web of Science and Scopus was conducted on September 30th 2024 (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42023484213). Only randomized controlled trials of drugs intended for IPF treatment in adults and reporting RTI incidence were included. Pooled risk ratio with 95% confidence interval (CI), risk of bias, GRADE and CINEMA assessments were conducted along with subgroup analyses for upper and lower RTI and for different antifibrotic doses.
A total of 27 trials of different drugs aimed for IPF therapy were pooled in a pairwise meta-analysis, 11,542 patients were analyzed with an overall number of 4156 RTI events, representing an average incidence of 38.4 ± 23.5%. Most therapies did not affect RTI risk in IPF, although single trials with everolimus and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole showed a significant decrease compared to placebo. For antifibrotics, RTI incidence was similar with pirfenidone treatment compared to nintedanib (RR: 0.98 CI: [0.71; 1.36]) and compared to placebo (RR: 0.88 CI: [0.69; 1.10]) and nintedanib compared to placebo (RR: 0.89 CI: [0.71; 1.12]).
RTIs are frequently reported adverse events in IPF patients over a one-year period, with different investigated treatments showing no profound impact compared to placebo. Future clinical trials should focus on targeting treatable traits like RTIs.
None.
特发性肺纤维化(IPF)是一种进行性致命性肺部疾病,呼吸道感染(RTI)等多种因素会导致病情恶化。目前尚无关于不同治疗方法(包括抗纤维化治疗(尼达尼布或吡非尼酮)、研究性治疗或安慰剂治疗)下IPF患者RTI发病率的综合数据。
于2024年9月30日对Medline、EMBASE、Cochrane Central、Web of Science和Scopus数据库进行系统检索(PROSPERO注册号:CRD42023484213)。纳入的研究仅为针对成人IPF治疗且报告了RTI发病率的随机对照试验。进行了合并风险比及95%置信区间(CI)、偏倚风险、GRADE和CINEMA评估,并对上下呼吸道RTI以及不同抗纤维化剂量进行了亚组分析。
在一项成对荟萃分析中汇总了总共27项针对IPF治疗的不同药物试验,分析了11542例患者,共有4156起RTI事件,平均发病率为38.4±23.5%。大多数治疗方法对IPF患者的RTI风险没有影响,不过与安慰剂相比,使用依维莫司和甲氧苄啶/磺胺甲恶唑的单项试验显示RTI发病率显著降低。对于抗纤维化药物,与尼达尼布相比,吡非尼酮治疗的RTI发病率相似(RR:0.98,CI:[0.71;1.36]),与安慰剂相比(RR:0.88,CI:[0.69;1.10]),尼达尼布与安慰剂相比(RR:0.89,CI:[0.71;1.12])。
RTI是IPF患者在一年期间经常报告的不良事件,与安慰剂相比,不同的研究性治疗方法未显示出深远影响。未来的临床试验应专注于针对可治疗的特征,如RTI。
无。