Lin Kenneth, Fajardo Kevin
Center for Primary Care, Prevention, and Clinical Partnerships, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, Maryland 20850, USA.
Ann Intern Med. 2008 Jul 1;149(1):W20-4. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-149-1-200807010-00009-w1.
Asymptomatic bacteriuria is common, and screening for this condition in pregnant women is a well-established, evidence-based standard of current medical practice. Screening other groups of adults has not been shown to improve outcomes.
To review new and substantial evidence on screening for asymptomatic bacteriuria, to support the work of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.
English-language studies of adults (age >18 years) indexed in PubMed and the Cochrane Library and published from 1 January 2002 through 30 April 2007.
For benefits of screening or treatment for screened populations, systematic reviews; meta-analyses; and randomized, controlled trials were included. For harms of screening, systematic reviews; meta-analyses; randomized, controlled trials; cohort studies; case-control studies; and case series of large multisite databases were included. Two reviewers independently reviewed titles, abstracts, and full articles for inclusion.
Two reviewers extracted data from studies on benefits of screening and treatment (including decreases in the incidence of adverse maternal and fetal outcomes, symptomatic urinary tract infections, hypertension, and renal function decline).
An updated Cochrane systematic review of 14 randomized, controlled trials of treatment supports screening for asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnant women. A randomized, controlled trial and a prospective cohort study show that screening nonpregnant women with diabetes for asymptomatic bacteriuria is unlikely to produce benefits. No new evidence on screening men for asymptomatic bacteriuria or on harms of screening was found.
The focused search strategy may have missed some smaller studies on the benefits and harms of screening for asymptomatic bacteriuria.
The available evidence continues to support screening for asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnant women, but not in other groups of adults.
无症状菌尿症很常见,对孕妇进行这种病症的筛查是当前医学实践中一项既定的、基于证据的标准。对其他成年人群体进行筛查尚未显示能改善预后。
回顾关于无症状菌尿症筛查的新的重要证据,以支持美国预防服务工作组的工作。
2002年1月1日至2007年4月30日期间在PubMed和Cochrane图书馆中索引的针对成年人(年龄>18岁)的英文研究。
对于筛查人群的筛查或治疗益处,纳入系统评价、荟萃分析以及随机对照试验。对于筛查危害,纳入系统评价、荟萃分析、随机对照试验、队列研究、病例对照研究以及大型多中心数据库的病例系列。两名评审员独立评审标题、摘要和全文以确定是否纳入。
两名评审员从关于筛查和治疗益处的研究中提取数据(包括不良母婴结局、症状性尿路感染、高血压和肾功能下降发生率的降低)。
一项对14项治疗随机对照试验的Cochrane系统评价更新版支持对孕妇进行无症状菌尿症筛查。一项随机对照试验和一项前瞻性队列研究表明,对糖尿病非孕妇进行无症状菌尿症筛查不太可能产生益处。未发现关于男性无症状菌尿症筛查或筛查危害的新证据。
有针对性的检索策略可能遗漏了一些关于无症状菌尿症筛查益处和危害的较小研究。
现有证据继续支持对孕妇进行无症状菌尿症筛查,但不支持对其他成年人群体进行筛查。