Rueda Fabio de, Souza Domingos, Lima Ricardo de Carvalho, Menezes Alexandre, Johansson Benny, Dashwood Michael, Thé Emmanuel, Gesteira Mário, Escobar Mozart, Vasconcelos Frederico
Divisão de Cirurgia Cardiotorácica, Hospital Oswaldo Cruz, Universidade de Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil.
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2008 Jun;90(6):356-62. doi: 10.1590/s0066-782x2008000600002.
Optimization of the saphenous vein for myocardial revascularization.
To present the no-touch technique of the saphenous vein preparation. This technique consists of harvesting the vein with a pedicle of surrounding tissue, which protects the vein from spasms, obviating the need for distension.
A prospective, randomized study with 156 patients who underwent artery bypass grafting was performed comparing three saphenous vein harvesting techniques: conventional, intermediate, and no-touch. A morphological study of the endothelium was carried out using scanning microscopy. An angiographic assessment of the vein graft patency was performed at a mean follow-up time of 18 months. Also, an immunohistochemical assessment was carried out to identify the endothelial enzyme nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) in the vein wall
The preservation of the endothelial cell integrity was greater in the no-touch technique than in the other procedures. At angiographic follow-up, the patency for the no-touch group was 95.4%, 88.9% for the grafts of the conventional technique group, and 86.2% for the grafts performed in the intermediate technique group. The immunohistochemical assessment revealed eNOS in all three layers of the vein wall in the no-touch group and reduction of this enzyme in the conventional group.
The endothelial integrity and eNOS activity were better preserved when using the no-touch technique for vein graft harvesting. The mechanical protection provided by the cushion of surrounding tissue in the no-touch group, the vasorelaxation and thromboresistant activities of nitric oxide may be responsible for the reduction of vasospasms and improved patency rate.
优化用于心肌血运重建的大隐静脉。
介绍大隐静脉制备的非接触技术。该技术包括采集带有周围组织蒂的静脉,这可保护静脉免受痉挛,无需进行扩张。
对156例行动脉搭桥术的患者进行前瞻性随机研究,比较三种大隐静脉采集技术:传统技术、中间技术和非接触技术。使用扫描显微镜对内皮进行形态学研究。在平均随访18个月时对静脉移植物通畅情况进行血管造影评估。此外,进行免疫组织化学评估以鉴定静脉壁中的内皮酶一氧化氮合酶(eNOS)。
非接触技术中内皮细胞完整性的保存优于其他方法。在血管造影随访中,非接触组的通畅率为95.4%,传统技术组移植物的通畅率为88.9%,中间技术组移植物的通畅率为86.2%。免疫组织化学评估显示非接触组静脉壁的所有三层均有eNOS,而传统组该酶减少。
使用非接触技术采集静脉移植物时,内皮完整性和eNOS活性得到更好的保存。非接触组中周围组织垫提供的机械保护、一氧化氮的血管舒张和抗血栓活性可能是减少血管痉挛和提高通畅率的原因。