Sng Kevin K, Koh Adrian J H, Tan Ngian-Chye, Tan Su-Ming, Tay Khoon-Hean
Department of General Surgery, Changi General Hospital, Singapore.
ANZ J Surg. 2008 Jul;78(7):573-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2008.04575.x.
Oesophageal perforation is uncommon, with controversy surrounding its optimal management. Our local experience shows a high incidence of oesophageal perforation secondary to ingested bones.
Fourteen patients with oesophageal perforation treated at Changi General Hospital in Singapore between January 1996 and December 2006 were retrospectively reviewed.
The median age was 52 years (16-79 years), with eight men and six women. There were 11 thoracic perforations and 3 cervical perforations. Ten perforations were the result of foreign body ingestion, three were spontaneous and only one was iatrogenic. The offending foreign body was a fish bone in five patients, a chicken bone in four and a tooth in one. Three of our 14 patients were treated surgically. The remaining 11 patients were treated non-operatively. All nine patients with fish or chicken bone perforation were treated conservatively, except two in whom conservative therapy failed and they subsequently required surgery. The median length of hospital stay was 7 days (2-109 days). There was one death.
Oesophageal perforation requires prompt diagnosis and treatment. Most of our oesophageal perforations are secondary to ingested bones. Such cases can often be treated conservatively in our experience.
食管穿孔并不常见,其最佳治疗方法存在争议。我们当地的经验显示,因吞食骨头导致的食管穿孔发生率较高。
回顾性分析了1996年1月至2006年12月期间在新加坡樟宜综合医院接受治疗的14例食管穿孔患者。
患者的中位年龄为52岁(16 - 79岁),其中男性8例,女性6例。有11例为胸段穿孔,3例为颈段穿孔。10例穿孔是由异物吞食引起的,3例为自发性穿孔,仅1例为医源性穿孔。导致穿孔的异物在5例患者中是鱼骨,4例中是鸡骨,1例中是牙齿。我们的14例患者中有3例接受了手术治疗。其余11例患者接受了非手术治疗。所有9例因鱼骨或鸡骨穿孔的患者均接受了保守治疗,除2例保守治疗失败随后需要手术的患者外。中位住院时间为7天(2 - 109天)。有1例死亡。
食管穿孔需要及时诊断和治疗。我们的大多数食管穿孔是由吞食骨头引起的。根据我们的经验,此类病例通常可以接受保守治疗。