Davis Estella M, Christensen Carla M, Nystrom Kelly K, Foral Pamela A, Destache Chris
Pharmacy Department, Alegent Health-Bergan Mercy Medical Center (AHBMMC), Omaha, NE, USA.
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2008 Jul 15;65(14):1347-57. doi: 10.2146/ajhp070636.
Patient satisfaction, safety and efficacy outcomes, and cost savings with insulin pens versus conventional insulin delivery via vials and syringes in hospitalized patients with diabetes were compared.
Patients were recruited from two general medical-surgical units from July 2005 to May 2006. Patients completed a survey regarding satisfaction with the method in which insulin was administered before discharge. Patients completed a telephone survey approximately four weeks after discharge to determine home insulin use. Cost savings were determined using the average wholesale price of insulin vials and syringes, pens, and pen needles.
A total of 94 patients were randomized to receive insulin administered via pen devices (n = 49) or using conventional vials and syringes (n = 45). Significantly more subjects in the pen group prepared or self-injected at least one dose of insulin during hospitalization, wanted to continue taking insulin at home using the method used during hospitalization, and would recommend their method of insulin administration used during hospitalization to other patients with diabetes compared with the vial and syringe group (p < 0.05). A cost saving of $36 per patient was projected if only insulin pens were dispensed during the entire hospital stay compared to insulin vials and syringes (p < 0.05).
Increased patient satisfaction and continuation of the method of insulin administration used in the hospital at home were reported by patients who received insulin pens compared with patients who received conventional vials and syringes during hospitalization. A substantial cost saving was projected for patients in the insulin pen group if insulin pens had been dispensed during their entire hospital stay.
比较胰岛素笔与传统胰岛素通过小瓶和注射器给药在住院糖尿病患者中的患者满意度、安全性和有效性结果以及成本节约情况。
2005年7月至2006年5月期间,从两个普通内科-外科病房招募患者。患者在出院前完成了一项关于对胰岛素给药方法满意度的调查。患者在出院后约四周完成电话调查以确定家庭胰岛素使用情况。使用胰岛素小瓶、注射器、胰岛素笔和笔用针头的平均批发价格来确定成本节约情况。
共有94名患者被随机分配接受通过胰岛素笔装置给药(n = 49)或使用传统小瓶和注射器给药(n = 45)。与使用小瓶和注射器组相比,胰岛素笔组中在住院期间准备或自行注射至少一剂胰岛素、希望在家中继续使用住院期间使用的方法注射胰岛素以及会向其他糖尿病患者推荐其住院期间使用的胰岛素给药方法的受试者明显更多(p < 0.05)。与胰岛素小瓶和注射器相比,如果在整个住院期间仅发放胰岛素笔,预计每位患者可节省36美元(p < 0.05)。
与住院期间接受传统小瓶和注射器的患者相比,接受胰岛素笔的患者报告患者满意度提高,且在家中继续使用住院期间使用的胰岛素给药方法。如果胰岛素笔组患者在整个住院期间都使用胰岛素笔,预计可节省大量成本。