Suppr超能文献

使用带安全针头的胰岛素笔装置时护士满意度的决定因素:一项探索性因素分析。

Determinants of nurse satisfaction using insulin pen devices with safety needles: an exploratory factor analysis.

作者信息

Veronesi Giovanni, Poerio Carmine S, Braus Alessandra, Destro Maurizio, Gilberti Lavinia, Meroni Giovanni, Davis Estella M, Bossi Antonio C

机构信息

Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Research Centre in Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy.

Metabolic Diseases and Diabetes Unit, A.O. Ospedale Treviglio-Caravaggio, P.le Ospedale, 1 - 24047 Treviglio, BG Italy.

出版信息

Clin Diabetes Endocrinol. 2015 Nov 9;1:15. doi: 10.1186/s40842-015-0015-3. eCollection 2015.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A paucity of data exists to examine nurses' satisfaction with the use of insulin pens with safety needles in hospitalized patients with diabetes. We investigated major determinants of nurses' preference of the method of insulin administration in the context of a General Hospital in Northern Italy.

METHODS

Consecutive patients admitted to three hospital units of different care intensity requiring insulin received insulin therapy through either the vial/syringe method (October to December 2012) or pen/safety needles with dual-ended protection method (January to March 2013). Before the implementation of insulin pens, floor nurses received a specific training program for proper insulin pen injection technique including individual testing of the devices (pen/safety needles). At the end of the study, nurses completed the Nursing Satisfaction Survey Questionnaire. Cronbach's alpha was used to determine the internal consistency and reliability of the questionnaire. Major determinants of satisfaction were investigated through an exploratory factor analysis. The association between each retained factor and time spent to teach patients how to self-inject insulin with pen devices was also investigated.

RESULTS

Fifty-three out of 60 nurses (mean age ± SD 36.2 ± 8.5 years, 85 % women, 57 % with 10+ years of working experience) returned the questionnaire. Internal consistency of the questionnaire was satisfactory (Cronbach's alpha > 0.9). Three months after their introduction, about 92 % of nurses considered pen devices an "improvement" over the vial/syringe method. Two factors explained 85 % of nurses' satisfaction, one related to convenience and ease of use, and the other to satisfaction/time spent for dose preparation and administration. The latter factor was inversely correlated with time spent on patients' training tasks.

CONCLUSIONS

Nurses' satisfaction with pen devices was higher than previously reported, possibly reinforced by safety needles with dual-ended protection. Perceived workload was a major determinant of nurse satisfaction using pen devices with safety needles. To facilitate the introduction of insulin pens in the hospital setting, it should be specifically addressed during training programs in the switch-over period.

摘要

背景

关于护士对住院糖尿病患者使用带安全针头的胰岛素笔的满意度的数据较少。我们在意大利北部一家综合医院的背景下,调查了护士对胰岛素给药方法偏好的主要决定因素。

方法

连续入住三个不同护理强度且需要胰岛素治疗的医院科室的患者,分别通过小瓶/注射器方法(2012年10月至12月)或笔/带双端保护的安全针头方法(2013年1月至3月)接受胰岛素治疗。在引入胰岛素笔之前,病房护士接受了关于正确胰岛素笔注射技术的特定培训项目,包括对设备(笔/安全针头)的个人测试。在研究结束时,护士完成了护理满意度调查问卷。使用克朗巴哈系数来确定问卷的内部一致性和可靠性。通过探索性因素分析研究满意度的主要决定因素。还研究了每个保留因素与教导患者如何使用笔式设备自行注射胰岛素所花费时间之间的关联。

结果

60名护士中有53名(平均年龄±标准差36.2±8.5岁,85%为女性,57%有10年以上工作经验)返回了问卷。问卷的内部一致性令人满意(克朗巴哈系数>0.9)。引入笔式设备三个月后,约92%的护士认为笔式设备比小瓶/注射器方法“有所改进”。两个因素解释了护士满意度的85%,一个与便利性和易用性有关,另一个与剂量准备和给药的满意度/所花费时间有关。后一个因素与患者培训任务所花费的时间呈负相关。

结论

护士对笔式设备的满意度高于先前报道,可能是由于带双端保护的安全针头而得到加强。感知工作量是护士对使用带安全针头的笔式设备满意度的主要决定因素。为便于在医院环境中引入胰岛素笔,在过渡期的培训项目中应特别加以解决。

相似文献

1
Determinants of nurse satisfaction using insulin pen devices with safety needles: an exploratory factor analysis.
Clin Diabetes Endocrinol. 2015 Nov 9;1:15. doi: 10.1186/s40842-015-0015-3. eCollection 2015.
3
Nurse satisfaction using insulin pens in hospitalized patients.
Diabetes Educ. 2009 Sep-Oct;35(5):799-809. doi: 10.1177/0145721709340057. Epub 2009 Jul 24.
4
A Prospective Study for Introducing Insulin Pens and Safety Needles in a Hospital Setting. The SANITHY Study.
Curr Diabetes Rev. 2016;12(4):460-467. doi: 10.2174/1573399811666150806150210.
6
Insulin pen needles: effects of extra-thin wall needle technology on preference, confidence, and other patient ratings.
Clin Ther. 2013 Jul;35(7):923-933.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2013.05.020. Epub 2013 Jun 20.
7
Time-Motion Analysis of Nurses Utilizing Insulin Pen Devices Compared to Vial and Syringe in an Inpatient Setting.
J Pharm Pract. 2019 Apr;32(2):126-131. doi: 10.1177/0897190017743132. Epub 2017 Nov 21.
10
Review of insulin therapy and pen use in hospitalized patients.
Hosp Pharm. 2013 May;48(5):396-405. doi: 10.1310/hpj4805-396.

引用本文的文献

1
16. Diabetes Care in the Hospital: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2025.
Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan 1;48(Supplement_1):S321-S334. doi: 10.2337/dc25-S016.
2
16. Diabetes Care in the Hospital: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2024.
Diabetes Care. 2024 Jan 1;47(Suppl 1):S295-S306. doi: 10.2337/dc24-S016.
3
4
16. Diabetes Care in the Hospital: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2023.
Diabetes Care. 2023 Jan 1;46(Suppl 1):S267-S278. doi: 10.2337/dc23-S016.
6
Inpatient Insulin Pen Implementation, Waste, and Potential Cost Savings: A Community Hospital Experience.
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2021 Jul;15(4):741-747. doi: 10.1177/19322968211002514. Epub 2021 Apr 12.
7
DropSafe safety pen needle helps to prevent accidental needlesticks after injections: results of a simulated clinical study.
J Infect Prev. 2021 Jan;22(1):19-27. doi: 10.1177/1757177420948580. Epub 2020 Sep 1.
8
Assessment of Insulin Injection Practice of Nurses Working in a Tertiary Healthcare Center of Nepal.
Nurs Res Pract. 2018 Aug 1;2018:9375067. doi: 10.1155/2018/9375067. eCollection 2018.
9
A Prospective Study for Introducing Insulin Pens and Safety Needles in a Hospital Setting. The SANITHY Study.
Curr Diabetes Rev. 2016;12(4):460-467. doi: 10.2174/1573399811666150806150210.

本文引用的文献

1
Review of insulin therapy and pen use in hospitalized patients.
Hosp Pharm. 2013 May;48(5):396-405. doi: 10.1310/hpj4805-396.
2
Sharing insulin pens: are you putting patients at risk?
Diabetes Care. 2013 Nov;36(11):e188-9. doi: 10.2337/dc13-1522.
3
Biological contamination of insulin pens in a hospital setting.
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2013 Jul 15;70(14):1244-8. doi: 10.2146/ajhp120728.
4
Impact of an interchange program to support use of insulin pens.
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2011 Jul 15;68(14):1349-52. doi: 10.2146/ajhp100535.
6
Managing diabetes-related costs and quality of life issues: Value of insulin analogs and pens for inpatient use.
Health Policy. 2010 Aug;96(3):191-9. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2010.02.006. Epub 2010 Mar 11.
7
Assessment of patient-reported outcomes of insulin pen devices versus conventional vial and syringe.
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2009 Aug;11(8):529-38. doi: 10.1089/dia.2009.0007.
8
Nurse satisfaction using insulin pens in hospitalized patients.
Diabetes Educ. 2009 Sep-Oct;35(5):799-809. doi: 10.1177/0145721709340057. Epub 2009 Jul 24.
10
Risk of needlestick injuries by injection pens.
J Hosp Infect. 2006 May;63(1):60-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2005.12.006. Epub 2006 Mar 15.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验