Veronesi Giovanni, Poerio Carmine S, Braus Alessandra, Destro Maurizio, Gilberti Lavinia, Meroni Giovanni, Davis Estella M, Bossi Antonio C
Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Research Centre in Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy.
Metabolic Diseases and Diabetes Unit, A.O. Ospedale Treviglio-Caravaggio, P.le Ospedale, 1 - 24047 Treviglio, BG Italy.
Clin Diabetes Endocrinol. 2015 Nov 9;1:15. doi: 10.1186/s40842-015-0015-3. eCollection 2015.
A paucity of data exists to examine nurses' satisfaction with the use of insulin pens with safety needles in hospitalized patients with diabetes. We investigated major determinants of nurses' preference of the method of insulin administration in the context of a General Hospital in Northern Italy.
Consecutive patients admitted to three hospital units of different care intensity requiring insulin received insulin therapy through either the vial/syringe method (October to December 2012) or pen/safety needles with dual-ended protection method (January to March 2013). Before the implementation of insulin pens, floor nurses received a specific training program for proper insulin pen injection technique including individual testing of the devices (pen/safety needles). At the end of the study, nurses completed the Nursing Satisfaction Survey Questionnaire. Cronbach's alpha was used to determine the internal consistency and reliability of the questionnaire. Major determinants of satisfaction were investigated through an exploratory factor analysis. The association between each retained factor and time spent to teach patients how to self-inject insulin with pen devices was also investigated.
Fifty-three out of 60 nurses (mean age ± SD 36.2 ± 8.5 years, 85 % women, 57 % with 10+ years of working experience) returned the questionnaire. Internal consistency of the questionnaire was satisfactory (Cronbach's alpha > 0.9). Three months after their introduction, about 92 % of nurses considered pen devices an "improvement" over the vial/syringe method. Two factors explained 85 % of nurses' satisfaction, one related to convenience and ease of use, and the other to satisfaction/time spent for dose preparation and administration. The latter factor was inversely correlated with time spent on patients' training tasks.
Nurses' satisfaction with pen devices was higher than previously reported, possibly reinforced by safety needles with dual-ended protection. Perceived workload was a major determinant of nurse satisfaction using pen devices with safety needles. To facilitate the introduction of insulin pens in the hospital setting, it should be specifically addressed during training programs in the switch-over period.
关于护士对住院糖尿病患者使用带安全针头的胰岛素笔的满意度的数据较少。我们在意大利北部一家综合医院的背景下,调查了护士对胰岛素给药方法偏好的主要决定因素。
连续入住三个不同护理强度且需要胰岛素治疗的医院科室的患者,分别通过小瓶/注射器方法(2012年10月至12月)或笔/带双端保护的安全针头方法(2013年1月至3月)接受胰岛素治疗。在引入胰岛素笔之前,病房护士接受了关于正确胰岛素笔注射技术的特定培训项目,包括对设备(笔/安全针头)的个人测试。在研究结束时,护士完成了护理满意度调查问卷。使用克朗巴哈系数来确定问卷的内部一致性和可靠性。通过探索性因素分析研究满意度的主要决定因素。还研究了每个保留因素与教导患者如何使用笔式设备自行注射胰岛素所花费时间之间的关联。
60名护士中有53名(平均年龄±标准差36.2±8.5岁,85%为女性,57%有10年以上工作经验)返回了问卷。问卷的内部一致性令人满意(克朗巴哈系数>0.9)。引入笔式设备三个月后,约92%的护士认为笔式设备比小瓶/注射器方法“有所改进”。两个因素解释了护士满意度的85%,一个与便利性和易用性有关,另一个与剂量准备和给药的满意度/所花费时间有关。后一个因素与患者培训任务所花费的时间呈负相关。
护士对笔式设备的满意度高于先前报道,可能是由于带双端保护的安全针头而得到加强。感知工作量是护士对使用带安全针头的笔式设备满意度的主要决定因素。为便于在医院环境中引入胰岛素笔,在过渡期的培训项目中应特别加以解决。