Toma Catalina L, Hancock Jeffrey T, Ellison Nicole B
Department of Communication, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14850, USA.
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2008 Aug;34(8):1023-36. doi: 10.1177/0146167208318067.
This study examines self-presentation in online dating profiles using a novel cross-validation technique for establishing accuracy. Eighty online daters rated the accuracy of their online self-presentation. Information about participants' physical attributes was then collected (height, weight, and age) and compared with their online profile, revealing that deviations tended to be ubiquitous but small in magnitude. Men lied more about their height, and women lied more about their weight, with participants farther from the mean lying more. Participants' self-ratings of accuracy were significantly correlated with observed accuracy, suggesting that inaccuracies were intentional rather than self-deceptive. Overall, participants reported being the least accurate about their photographs and the most accurate about their relationship information. Deception patterns suggest that participants strategically balanced the deceptive opportunities presented by online self-presentation (e.g., the editability of profiles) with the social constraints of establishing romantic relationships (e.g., the anticipation of future interaction).
本研究使用一种用于确定准确性的新型交叉验证技术,考察在线约会资料中的自我呈现。80名在线约会者对自己在线自我呈现的准确性进行了评分。随后收集了参与者的身体特征信息(身高、体重和年龄),并将其与他们的在线资料进行比较,结果显示偏差往往普遍存在,但幅度较小。男性在身高方面说谎更多,女性在体重方面说谎更多,离均值越远的参与者说谎越多。参与者对准确性的自我评分与观察到的准确性显著相关,这表明不准确是故意的,而非自我欺骗。总体而言,参与者报告称他们对自己照片的描述最不准确,对自己关系信息的描述最准确。欺骗模式表明,参与者在在线自我呈现带来的欺骗机会(如资料的可编辑性)与建立浪漫关系的社会限制(如对未来互动的预期)之间进行了策略性平衡。