• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

艾森克人格问卷修订版(EPQ-R)各维度的自欺性增强与印象管理相关性

Self-Deceptive Enhancement and Impression Management correlates of EPQ-R dimensions.

作者信息

Davies M F, French C C, Keogh E

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Goldsmiths College, University of London, England.

出版信息

J Psychol. 1998 Jul;132(4):401-6. doi: 10.1080/00223989809599274.

DOI:10.1080/00223989809599274
PMID:9637022
Abstract

The Self-Deceptive Enhancement and Impression Management scales of the Paulhus (1991) Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding were correlated with the Psychoticism, Neuroticism, Extraversion, and Lie scales of the Eysenck EPQ-R (Eysenck & Eysenck, 1991) in a student sample. Extraversion correlated positively and Neuroticism correlated negatively with Self-Deceptive Enhancement, whereas Psychoticism correlated negatively and the Lie scale correlated positively with Impression Management. These findings suggest that the EPQ-R scales are involved in different aspects of socially desirable responding. It was concluded that social desirability should not be controlled in measures of Extraversion and Neuroticism but it should be controlled in measures of Psychoticism.

摘要

在一个学生样本中,保罗hus(1991年)的《期望反应平衡量表》中的自我欺骗性增强量表和印象管理量表,与艾森克EPQ - R(艾森克和艾森克,1991年)的精神质、神经质、外向性和说谎量表相关。外向性与自我欺骗性增强呈正相关,神经质与自我欺骗性增强呈负相关,而精神质与印象管理呈负相关,说谎量表与印象管理呈正相关。这些发现表明,EPQ - R量表涉及社会期望反应的不同方面。研究得出结论,在外向性和神经质的测量中不应控制社会期望性,但在精神质的测量中应控制社会期望性。

相似文献

1
Self-Deceptive Enhancement and Impression Management correlates of EPQ-R dimensions.艾森克人格问卷修订版(EPQ-R)各维度的自欺性增强与印象管理相关性
J Psychol. 1998 Jul;132(4):401-6. doi: 10.1080/00223989809599274.
2
Comparing continuous and dichotomous scoring of the balanced inventory of desirable responding.比较期望反应平衡量表的连续评分和二分法评分。
J Pers Assess. 2002 Apr;78(2):370-89. doi: 10.1207/S15327752JPA7802_10.
3
Substance and style in socially desirable responding.社会期望反应中的实质与风格。
J Pers. 2007 Apr;75(2):291-322. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2006.00440.x.
4
Taxometric analysis of impression management and self-deception in college student and personnel evaluation settings.大学生及人员评估环境中印象管理与自我欺骗的税式分析。
J Pers Assess. 2002 Feb;78(1):161-75. doi: 10.1207/S15327752JPA7801_10.
5
Association between alexithymia, neuroticism, and social desirability scores among Italian graduate students.意大利研究生中述情障碍、神经质和社会赞许性得分之间的关联。
Psychol Rep. 2010 Aug;107(1):185-92. doi: 10.2466/02.07.13.15.PR0.107.4.185-192.
6
Eysenck personality inventory: impulsivity/neuroticism and social desirability response set.艾森克人格问卷:冲动性/神经质与社会赞许性反应定势
Psychol Rep. 1996 Feb;78(1):35-40. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1996.78.1.35.
7
Personality correlates of type A coronary-prone behavior.A型冠心病易发性行为的人格相关性。
J Pers Assess. 1988 Fall;52(3):434-40. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa5203_4.
8
Modeling the balanced inventory of desirable responding: evidence in favor of a revised model of socially desirable responding.构建理想反应的平衡库存模型:支持社会期望反应修正模型的证据。
J Pers Assess. 2013;95(6):645-56. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2013.816717. Epub 2013 Jul 17.
9
Personality and smoking behavior.个性与吸烟行为。
J Pers Assess. 1982 Aug;46(4):396-403. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4604_11.
10
Patterns of socially desirable responding among perpetrators and victims of wife assault.妻子受虐事件中施暴者与受害者的社会期望性反应模式。
Violence Vict. 1992 Spring;7(1):29-39.

引用本文的文献

1
The Association Between Social Desirability and Competitive Anxiety in Young Football Players with Different Qualifications.不同资质年轻足球运动员的社会赞许性与竞争焦虑之间的关联
Psychol Russ. 2024 Sep 15;17(3):114-124. doi: 10.11621/pir.2024.0308. eCollection 2024.
2
White and non-White Australian mental health care practitioners' desirable responding, cultural competence, and racial/ethnic attitudes.澳大利亚白人和非白种人心理健康护理从业者的理想反应、文化能力和种族/民族态度。
BMC Psychol. 2022 May 7;10(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s40359-022-00818-4.
3
Honest People Tend to Use Less-Not More-Profanity: Comment on Feldman et al.'s (2017) Study 1.
诚实的人往往较少使用(而非更多使用)亵渎性语言:对费尔德曼等人(2017年)研究1的评论
Soc Psychol Personal Sci. 2018 Jul;9(5):516-520. doi: 10.1177/1948550617714586. Epub 2017 Jul 21.