Rydell Robert J, Mackie Diane M, Maitner Angela T, Claypool Heather M, Ryan Melissa J, Smith Eliot R
Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, USA.
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2008 Aug;34(8):1141-52. doi: 10.1177/0146167208319694.
Intergroup emotions theory (IET) posits that when social categorization is salient, individuals feel the same emotions as others who share their group membership. Extensive research supporting this proposition has relied heavily on self-reports of group-based emotions. In three experiments, the authors provide converging evidence that group-based anger has subtle and less explicitly controlled consequences for information processing, using measures that do not rely on self-reported emotional experience. Specifically, the authors show that intergroup anger involves arousal (Experiment 1), reduces systematic processing of persuasive messages (Experiment 2), is moderated by group identification (Experiment 2, posttest), and compared to intergroup fear, increases risk taking (Experiment 3). These findings provide converging evidence that consistent with IET, emotions triggered by social categorization have psychologically consequential effects and are not evident solely in self-reports.
群体间情绪理论(IET)认为,当社会分类显著时,个体与同属一个群体的其他人会产生相同的情绪。大量支持这一观点的研究严重依赖基于群体的情绪的自我报告。在三项实验中,作者提供了相互印证的证据,表明基于群体的愤怒对信息处理有微妙且较难明确控制的影响,所使用的测量方法并不依赖自我报告的情绪体验。具体而言,作者表明群体间愤怒涉及唤醒(实验1),减少对说服性信息的系统处理(实验2),受到群体认同的调节(实验2,后测),并且与群体间恐惧相比,会增加冒险行为(实验3)。这些发现提供了相互印证的证据,即与IET一致,社会分类引发的情绪具有心理上的重要影响,且不仅仅在自我报告中明显。