• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

群体间情绪:解释群体间情境下的攻击行为倾向

Intergroup emotions: explaining offensive action tendencies in an intergroup context.

作者信息

Mackie D M, Devos T, Smith E R

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of California, Santa Barbara 93106-9660, USA.

出版信息

J Pers Soc Psychol. 2000 Oct;79(4):602-16.

PMID:11045741
Abstract

Three studies tested the idea that when social identity is salient, group-based appraisals elicit specific emotions and action tendencies toward out-groups. Participants' group memberships were made salient and the collective support apparently enjoyed by the in-group was measured or manipulated. The authors then measured anger and fear (Studies 1 and 2) and anger and contempt (Study 3), as well as the desire to move against or away from the out-group. Intergroup anger was distinct from intergroup fear, and the inclination to act against the out-group was distinct from the tendency to move away from it. Participants who perceived the in-group as strong were more likely to experience anger toward the out-group and to desire to take action against it. The effects of perceived in-group strength on offensive action tendencies were mediated by anger.

摘要

三项研究检验了这样一种观点

当社会身份显著时,基于群体的评价会引发针对外群体的特定情绪和行动倾向。参与者的群体成员身份被凸显出来,并且对本群体明显享有的集体支持进行了测量或操控。然后,作者测量了愤怒和恐惧(研究1和2)以及愤怒和轻蔑(研究3),还有针对外群体采取行动或远离外群体的意愿。群体间愤怒与群体间恐惧不同,针对外群体采取行动的倾向与远离外群体的倾向也不同。那些认为本群体强大的参与者更有可能对外群体感到愤怒,并渴望对其采取行动。感知到的本群体力量对攻击性行动倾向的影响是通过愤怒来介导的。

相似文献

1
Intergroup emotions: explaining offensive action tendencies in an intergroup context.群体间情绪:解释群体间情境下的攻击行为倾向
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2000 Oct;79(4):602-16.
2
Testing the limits of tolerance: how intergroup anxiety amplifies negative and offensive responses to out-group-initiated contact.测试容忍限度:群体间焦虑如何放大对外群体发起接触的负面和冒犯性反应。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2007 Dec;33(12):1686-99. doi: 10.1177/0146167207307485.
3
The communication of "pure" group-based anger reduces tendencies toward intergroup conflict because it increases out-group empathy.“纯粹”基于群体的愤怒的交流减少了群体间冲突的倾向,因为它增加了对群体外的同理心。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2013 Aug;39(8):1043-52. doi: 10.1177/0146167213489140. Epub 2013 May 24.
4
Put your money where your mouth is! Explaining collective action tendencies through group-based anger and group efficacy.言行一致!通过群体愤怒和群体效能来解释集体行动倾向。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2004 Nov;87(5):649-64. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.87.5.649.
5
Beat them or ban them: the characteristics and social functions of anger and contempt.打击他们还是摒弃他们:愤怒与轻蔑的特征及社会功能
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2007 Jul;93(1):103-15. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.93.1.103.
6
We feel, therefore we are: emotion as a basis for self-categorization and social action.我们有所感,故我们是:情感作为自我归类和社会行动的基础。
Emotion. 2011 Aug;11(4):754-67. doi: 10.1037/a0023223.
7
Intergroup conflict, out-group derogation, and self-directed negative affect among Italian South Tyroleans.意大利南蒂罗尔人中的群体间冲突、外群体诋毁和自我导向的消极情绪。
J Soc Psychol. 2004 Apr;144(2):181-9. doi: 10.3200/SOCP.144.2.181-190.
8
The neuropeptide oxytocin regulates parochial altruism in intergroup conflict among humans.神经肽催产素调节人类群体间冲突中的狭隘利他主义。
Science. 2010 Jun 11;328(5984):1408-11. doi: 10.1126/science.1189047.
9
Arousal, processing, and risk taking: consequences of intergroup anger.唤醒、处理与冒险:群体间愤怒的后果。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2008 Aug;34(8):1141-52. doi: 10.1177/0146167208319694.
10
Effects of a group forgiveness intervention on forgiveness, perceived stress, and trait-anger.团体宽恕干预对宽恕、感知压力和特质愤怒的影响。
J Clin Psychol. 2006 Jun;62(6):715-33. doi: 10.1002/jclp.20264.

引用本文的文献

1
Coexistence and Social Exclusion of Venezuelan Migrants in Lima, Perú: A Psychosocial Approach.秘鲁利马委内瑞拉移民的共存与社会排斥:一种社会心理视角
Psychol Russ. 2024 Dec 1;17(4):85-108. doi: 10.11621/pir.2024.0405. eCollection 2024.
2
The Appraisal Model of Conspiracy Theories (AMCT): Applying Appraisal Theories to Understand Emotional and Behavioral Reactions to Conspiracy Theories.阴谋论评估模型(AMCT):应用评估理论理解对阴谋论的情绪和行为反应
Psychol Inq. 2025 Mar 13;35(3-4):159-178. doi: 10.1080/1047840X.2024.2442906. eCollection 2024.
3
Breaking the silence: How male and female bystanders influence victims of gender prejudice.
打破沉默:男性和女性旁观者如何影响性别偏见受害者。
BMC Psychol. 2025 Feb 27;13(1):168. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-02515-4.
4
Voices of Loyal Members: Dual Role of Organizational Identification in the Process of Employee Voice.忠诚成员之声:组织认同在员工建言过程中的双重作用。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Jan 22;15(2):109. doi: 10.3390/bs15020109.
5
Political conservatism and social distancing from people living with HIV among Medical students: mediating roles of negative stereotypes and negative Intergroup emotions.医学生中的政治保守主义以及与艾滋病毒感染者的社会距离:负面刻板印象和负面群体间情绪的中介作用
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Feb 11;25(1):220. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-06768-w.
6
Analyzing Antecedent Configurations of Group Emotion Generation in Public Emergencies: A Multi-Factor Coupling Approach.突发公共事件中群体情绪生成的前因构型分析:一种多因素耦合方法
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Jan 3;15(1):41. doi: 10.3390/bs15010041.
7
Understanding Reactions to Informative Process Model Interventions: Ambivalence as a Mechanism of Change.理解对信息过程模型干预的反应:矛盾情绪作为一种改变机制。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Dec 2;14(12):1152. doi: 10.3390/bs14121152.
8
Proenvironmental self identity as a moderator of psychosocial predictors in the purchase of sustainable clothing.亲环境自我认同在购买可持续服装的心理社会预测因素中的调节作用。
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 14;14(1):23968. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-74234-6.
9
Social identity correlates of social media engagement before and after the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine.社交媒体在 2022 年俄罗斯入侵乌克兰前后的使用情况与社会认同的相关性。
Nat Commun. 2024 Oct 1;15(1):8127. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-52179-8.
10
The paradoxical brain: paradoxes impact conflict perspectives through increased neural alignment.矛盾的大脑:矛盾通过增加神经一致性来影响冲突观点。
Cereb Cortex. 2024 Sep 3;34(9). doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhae353.