Clamp A R, Ryder W D J, Bhattacharya S, Pettengell R, Radford J A
Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Research UK, University of Manchester, Christie Hospital, Wilmslow Rd., Manchester M20 4BX, UK.
Br J Cancer. 2008 Jul 22;99(2):253-8. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604468. Epub 2008 Jul 1.
The effect of utilising granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) to maintain chemotherapy dose intensity in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) on long-term mortality patterns has not been formally evaluated. We analysed prolonged follow-up data from the first randomised controlled trial investigating this approach. Data on 10-year overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), freedom from progression (FFP) and incidence of second malignancies were collected for 80 patients with aggressive subtypes of NHL, who had been randomised to receive either VAPEC-B chemotherapy or VAPEC-B+G-CSF. Median follow-up was 15.7 years for surviving patients. No significant differences were found in PFS or OS. However, 10-year FFP was better in the G-CSF arm (68 vs 47%, P=0.037). Eleven deaths from causes unrelated to NHL or its treatment occurred in the G-CSF arm compared to five in controls. More deaths occurred from second malignancies (4 vs 2) and cardiovascular causes (5 vs 0) in the G-CSF arm. Although this pharmacovigilance study has insufficient statistical power to draw conclusions and is limited by the lack of data on smoking history and other cardiovascular risk factors, these unique long-term outcome data generate hypotheses that warrant further investigation.
在非霍奇金淋巴瘤(NHL)中,使用粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)维持化疗剂量强度对长期死亡率模式的影响尚未得到正式评估。我们分析了第一项研究该方法的随机对照试验的长期随访数据。收集了80例侵袭性NHL亚型患者的10年总生存期(OS)、无进展生存期(PFS)、无进展生存(FFP)和第二原发恶性肿瘤发生率的数据,这些患者被随机分配接受VAPEC-B化疗或VAPEC-B+G-CSF。存活患者的中位随访时间为15.7年。PFS或OS未发现显著差异。然而,G-CSF组的10年FFP更好(68%对47%,P=0.037)。G-CSF组有11例死于与NHL或其治疗无关的原因,而对照组为5例。G-CSF组死于第二原发恶性肿瘤(4例对2例)和心血管原因(5例对0例)的更多。尽管这项药物警戒研究的统计效力不足以得出结论,且因缺乏吸烟史和其他心血管危险因素的数据而受到限制,但这些独特的长期结局数据产生了有待进一步研究的假设。