• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项针对60岁及以上侵袭性非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者的III期试验,比较CHOP方案与含或不含粒细胞集落刺激因子的PMitCEBO方案。

A phase III trial comparing CHOP to PMitCEBO with or without G-CSF in patients aged 60 plus with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

作者信息

Burton C, Linch D, Hoskin P, Milligan D, Dyer M J S, Hancock B, Mouncey P, Smith P, Qian W, MacLennan K, Jack A, Webb A, Cunningham D

机构信息

University College London and CRUK Clinical Trials Centre, 222 Euston Road, London NW1 2DA, UK.

出版信息

Br J Cancer. 2006 Mar 27;94(6):806-13. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602975.

DOI:10.1038/sj.bjc.6602975
PMID:16508640
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3216418/
Abstract

The management of older patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma presents a challenge to the physician. Age is a poor prognostic indicator, due to reduced ability to tolerate and maintain dose-intensive chemotherapy. Generally, older patients demonstrate a lower response rate, reduced survival and increased toxicity, although the majority of large randomised trials exclude older patients. This randomised trial was conducted in patients 60 years or over to compare CHOP (cyclophosphamide 750 mg m(-2), doxorubicin 50 mg m(-2), vincristine 1.4 mg m(-2), prednisolone 100 mg) with PMitCEBO (mitoxantrone 7 mg m(-2), cyclophosphamide 300 mg m(-2), etoposide 150 mg m(-2), vincristine 1.4 mg m(-2), bleomycin 10 mg m(-2) and prednisolone 50 mg). Due to the myelosuppressive nature of these regimens, patients were also randomised to the addition of G-CSF. The formal results of this trial with long-term follow-up are now reported. Data were analysed to assess efficacy and toxicity. Overall response rate was 84% in the CHOP arm and 83% in the PMitCEBO arm, with overall response rates of 83% for the use of G-CSF and 84% for no G-CSF. At median 44 months follow-up, there was no significant difference in failure-free, progression-free or overall survival between the CHOP and PMitCEBO arms. At 3 years, the actuarial failure-free survival was 44% in CHOP recipients and 42% in PMitCEBO recipients and the 3-year actuarial overall survival was 46% and 45% respectively. There was no significant difference in the failure-free, progression-free or overall survival with the addition of G-CSF.

摘要

老年侵袭性非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者的管理对医生来说是一项挑战。年龄是一个不良的预后指标,因为耐受和维持剂量密集化疗的能力下降。一般来说,老年患者的缓解率较低、生存率降低且毒性增加,尽管大多数大型随机试验都将老年患者排除在外。这项随机试验针对60岁及以上的患者进行,比较了CHOP方案(环磷酰胺750 mg/m²、多柔比星50 mg/m²、长春新碱1.4 mg/m²、泼尼松龙100 mg)与PMitCEBO方案(米托蒽醌7 mg/m²、环磷酰胺300 mg/m²、依托泊苷150 mg/m²、长春新碱1.4 mg/m²、博来霉素10 mg/m²和泼尼松龙50 mg)。由于这些方案具有骨髓抑制性质,患者还被随机分组以决定是否添加粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)。现将这项具有长期随访的试验的正式结果报告如下。对数据进行分析以评估疗效和毒性。CHOP组的总缓解率为84%,PMitCEBO组为83%,使用G-CSF的总缓解率为83%,未使用G-CSF的为84%。在中位随访44个月时,CHOP组和PMitCEBO组在无失败生存期、无进展生存期或总生存期方面无显著差异。3年时,CHOP方案接受者的精算无失败生存率为44%,PMitCEBO方案接受者为42%,3年精算总生存率分别为46%和45%。添加G-CSF在无失败生存期、无进展生存期或总生存期方面无显著差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f35/3216418/8e5d91aa0847/94-6602975f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f35/3216418/4166f5743b93/94-6602975f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f35/3216418/8e5d91aa0847/94-6602975f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f35/3216418/4166f5743b93/94-6602975f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f35/3216418/8e5d91aa0847/94-6602975f2.jpg

相似文献

1
A phase III trial comparing CHOP to PMitCEBO with or without G-CSF in patients aged 60 plus with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.一项针对60岁及以上侵袭性非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者的III期试验,比较CHOP方案与含或不含粒细胞集落刺激因子的PMitCEBO方案。
Br J Cancer. 2006 Mar 27;94(6):806-13. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602975.
2
Practicability and acute haematological toxicity of 2- and 3-weekly CHOP and CHOEP chemotherapy for aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: results from the NHL-B trial of the German High-Grade Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Study Group (DSHNHL).每2周和3周进行一次CHOP及CHOEP化疗用于侵袭性非霍奇金淋巴瘤的实用性和急性血液学毒性:德国高度恶性非霍奇金淋巴瘤研究组(DSHNHL)的NHL-B试验结果
Ann Oncol. 2003 Jun;14(6):881-93. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdg249.
3
Randomized phase II study of biweekly CHOP and dose-escalated CHOP with prophylactic use of lenograstim (glycosylated G-CSF) in aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study 9505.侵袭性非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者接受每两周一次CHOP方案及剂量递增CHOP方案联合预防性使用来格司亭(糖基化粒细胞集落刺激因子)的随机II期研究:日本临床肿瘤学组研究9505
Ann Oncol. 2002 Sep;13(9):1347-55. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdf287.
4
Mitoxantrone is superior to doxorubicin in a multiagent weekly regimen for patients older than 60 with high-grade lymphoma: results of a BNLI randomized trial of PAdriaCEBO versus PMitCEBO.对于60岁以上的高级别淋巴瘤患者,在多药联合每周方案中,米托蒽醌优于阿霉素:BNLI关于PAdriaCEBO与PMitCEBO的随机试验结果
Blood. 2001 May 15;97(10):2991-7. doi: 10.1182/blood.v97.10.2991.
5
A randomised multicentre trial of modified CHOP versus MCOP in patients aged 65 years and over with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.一项针对65岁及以上侵袭性非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者的改良CHOP方案与MCOP方案的随机多中心试验。
Ann Oncol. 2003 Feb;14(2):258-67. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdg067.
6
CyclOBEAP (cyclophosphamide, vincristine, bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, prednisolone) regimen with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) for patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a pilot study. The Adult Lymphoma Treatment Study Group (ALTSG).
Eur J Haematol. 2000 Sep;65(3):188-94. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0609.2000.00250.x.
7
Dose-escalated cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone, and etoposide (CHOPE) chemotherapy for patients with diffuse lymphoma: Cancer and Leukemia Group B studies 8852 and 8854.剂量递增的环磷酰胺、阿霉素、长春新碱、泼尼松和依托泊苷(CHOPE)化疗方案用于弥漫性淋巴瘤患者:癌症与白血病B组研究8852和8854
Cancer. 2001 Jul 15;92(2):207-17. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(20010715)92:2<207::aid-cncr1311>3.0.co;2-d.
8
CHOP is superior to CNOP in elderly patients with aggressive lymphoma while outcome is unaffected by filgrastim treatment: results of a Nordic Lymphoma Group randomized trial.对于侵袭性淋巴瘤老年患者,CHOP方案优于CNOP方案,而结果不受非格司亭治疗的影响:北欧淋巴瘤研究组随机试验结果
Blood. 2003 May 15;101(10):3840-8. doi: 10.1182/blood-2002-10-3238. Epub 2003 Jan 16.
9
Comparison of a standard regimen (CHOP) with three intensive chemotherapy regimens for advanced non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.标准方案(CHOP)与三种强化化疗方案治疗晚期非霍奇金淋巴瘤的比较。
N Engl J Med. 1993 Apr 8;328(14):1002-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199304083281404.
10
CHOP compared with CHOP plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in elderly patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.老年侵袭性非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者中CHOP方案与CHOP联合粒细胞集落刺激因子方案的比较
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Aug 15;21(16):3041-50. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.01.076.

引用本文的文献

1
Patterns of growth factor usage and febrile neutropenia among older patients with diffuse large B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma treated with CHOP or R-CHOP: the Intergroup experience (CALGB 9793; ECOG-SWOG 4494).接受CHOP或R-CHOP治疗的老年弥漫性大B细胞非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者生长因子使用模式及发热性中性粒细胞减少症:多中心研究经验(CALGB 9793;ECOG-SWOG 4494)
Leuk Lymphoma. 2017 Aug;58(8):1814-1822. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2016.1265111. Epub 2016 Dec 14.
2
Prophylactic antibiotics or G(M)-CSF for the prevention of infections and improvement of survival in cancer patients receiving myelotoxic chemotherapy.预防性使用抗生素或粒细胞-巨噬细胞集落刺激因子以预防接受骨髓毒性化疗的癌症患者发生感染并提高生存率。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Dec 21;2015(12):CD007107. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007107.pub3.
3

本文引用的文献

1
A population-based study of severity of comorbidity among patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: prognostic impact independent of International Prognostic Index.一项基于人群的非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者合并症严重程度研究:独立于国际预后指数的预后影响
Br J Haematol. 2005 Jun;129(5):597-606. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2005.05508.x.
2
Long-term results of the R-CHOP study in the treatment of elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a study by the Groupe d'Etude des Lymphomes de l'Adulte.R-CHOP方案治疗老年弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤的长期结果:成人淋巴瘤研究组的一项研究
J Clin Oncol. 2005 Jun 20;23(18):4117-26. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.09.131. Epub 2005 May 2.
3
Re: personalized medicine and cancer supportive care: appropriate use of colony-stimulating factor support of chemotherapy.关于:个性化医疗与癌症支持治疗:化疗中集落刺激因子支持的合理应用。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011 Dec 21;103(24):1899-901; author reply 1901-3. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djr439. Epub 2011 Oct 28.
4
Identification of potential surrogate end points in randomized clinical trials of aggressive and indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: correlation of complete response, time-to-event and overall survival end points.侵袭性和惰性非霍奇金淋巴瘤随机临床试验中潜在替代终点的鉴定:完全缓解、时间相关终点和总生存终点的相关性。
Ann Oncol. 2011 Jun;22(6):1392-1403. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdq615. Epub 2011 Jan 25.
5
Implications of the European Organisation for Research And Treatment Of Cancer (EORTC) guidelines on the use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) for lymphoma care.欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织(EORTC)关于使用粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)治疗淋巴瘤的指南的影响。
Clin Drug Investig. 2009;29(8):491-513. doi: 10.2165/00044011-200929080-00001.
6
Inflammatory (B) symptoms are independent predictors of myelosuppression from chemotherapy in Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL) patients--analysis of data from a British National Lymphoma Investigation phase III trial comparing CHOP to PMitCEBO.炎症(B)症状是非霍奇金淋巴瘤(NHL)患者化疗引起骨髓抑制的独立预测因素——对一项英国国家淋巴瘤调查III期试验数据的分析,该试验比较了CHOP方案与PMitCEBO方案。
BMC Cancer. 2009 May 18;9:153. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-9-153.
7
Granulopoiesis-stimulating factors to prevent adverse effects in the treatment of malignant lymphoma.用于预防恶性淋巴瘤治疗中不良反应的粒细胞生成刺激因子。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Oct 8;2008(4):CD003189. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003189.pub4.
Epidemiology of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL): trends, geographic distribution, and etiology.
非霍奇金淋巴瘤(NHL)的流行病学:趋势、地理分布及病因
Ann Hematol. 2005 Jan;84(1):1-12. doi: 10.1007/s00277-004-0939-7. Epub 2004 Oct 9.
4
Two-weekly or 3-weekly CHOP chemotherapy with or without etoposide for the treatment of elderly patients with aggressive lymphomas: results of the NHL-B2 trial of the DSHNHL.每两周或每三周进行一次CHOP化疗(加或不加依托泊苷)用于治疗老年侵袭性淋巴瘤患者:德国淋巴瘤研究组(DSHNHL)的NHL-B2试验结果
Blood. 2004 Aug 1;104(3):634-41. doi: 10.1182/blood-2003-06-2095. Epub 2004 Mar 11.
5
CHOP compared with CHOP plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in elderly patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.老年侵袭性非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者中CHOP方案与CHOP联合粒细胞集落刺激因子方案的比较
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Aug 15;21(16):3041-50. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.01.076.
6
Practicability and acute haematological toxicity of 2- and 3-weekly CHOP and CHOEP chemotherapy for aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: results from the NHL-B trial of the German High-Grade Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Study Group (DSHNHL).每2周和3周进行一次CHOP及CHOEP化疗用于侵袭性非霍奇金淋巴瘤的实用性和急性血液学毒性:德国高度恶性非霍奇金淋巴瘤研究组(DSHNHL)的NHL-B试验结果
Ann Oncol. 2003 Jun;14(6):881-93. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdg249.
7
Congestive heart failure in patients treated with doxorubicin: a retrospective analysis of three trials.接受多柔比星治疗患者的充血性心力衰竭:三项试验的回顾性分析
Cancer. 2003 Jun 1;97(11):2869-79. doi: 10.1002/cncr.11407.
8
Early cardiotoxicity of the CHOP regimen in aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.CHOP方案治疗侵袭性非霍奇金淋巴瘤的早期心脏毒性
Ann Oncol. 2003 Feb;14(2):277-81. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdg070.
9
CHOP is superior to CNOP in elderly patients with aggressive lymphoma while outcome is unaffected by filgrastim treatment: results of a Nordic Lymphoma Group randomized trial.对于侵袭性淋巴瘤老年患者,CHOP方案优于CNOP方案,而结果不受非格司亭治疗的影响:北欧淋巴瘤研究组随机试验结果
Blood. 2003 May 15;101(10):3840-8. doi: 10.1182/blood-2002-10-3238. Epub 2003 Jan 16.
10
Mitoxantrone is superior to doxorubicin in a multiagent weekly regimen for patients older than 60 with high-grade lymphoma: results of a BNLI randomized trial of PAdriaCEBO versus PMitCEBO.对于60岁以上的高级别淋巴瘤患者,在多药联合每周方案中,米托蒽醌优于阿霉素:BNLI关于PAdriaCEBO与PMitCEBO的随机试验结果
Blood. 2001 May 15;97(10):2991-7. doi: 10.1182/blood.v97.10.2991.