Suppr超能文献

色觉敏感性的性别差异。

Sex-related differences in chromatic sensitivity.

作者信息

Rodríguez-Carmona M, Sharpe L T, Harlow J A, Barbur J L

机构信息

Applied Vision Research Centre, The Henry Wellcome Laboratories for Vision Sciences, City University, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Vis Neurosci. 2008 May-Jun;25(3):433-40. doi: 10.1017/S095252380808019X.

Abstract

Generally women are believed to be more discriminating than men in the use of color names and this is often taken to imply superior color vision. However, if both X-chromosome linked color deficient males (8%) and females (<1%) as well as heterozygote female carriers (15%) are excluded from comparisons, then differences between men and women in red-green (RG) color discrimination have been reported as not being significant (e.g., Pickford, 1944; Hood et al., 2006). We re-examined this question by assessing the performance of 150 males and 150 females on the color assessment and diagnosis (CAD) test (Rodriguez-Carmona et al., 2005). This is a sensitive test that yields small color detection thresholds. The test employs direction-specific, moving, chromatic stimuli embedded in a background of random, dynamic, luminance contrast noise. A four-alternative, forced-choice procedure is employed to measure the subject's thresholds for detection of color signals in 16 directions in color space, while ensuring that the subject cannot make use of any residual luminance contrast signals. In addition, we measured the Rayleigh anomaloscope matches in a subgroup of 111 males and 114 females. All the age-matched males (30.8 +/- 9.7) and females (26.7 +/- 8.8) had normal color vision as diagnosed by a battery of conventional color vision tests. Females with known color deficient relatives were excluded from the study. Comparisons between the male and female groups revealed no significant differences in anomaloscope midpoints (p = 0.709), but a significant difference in matching ranges (p = 0.040); females on average tended to have a larger mean range (4.11) than males (3.75). Females also had significantly higher CAD thresholds than males along the RG (p = 0.0004), but not along the yellow-blue (YB) discrimination axis. The differences between males and females in RG discrimination may be related to the heterozygosity in X-linked cone photo pigment expression common among females.

摘要

一般认为,女性在使用颜色名称方面比男性更具辨别力,这通常被认为意味着其具有更出色的色觉。然而,如果在比较中排除X染色体连锁的色盲男性(8%)、女性(<1%)以及杂合子女性携带者(15%),那么据报道,男性和女性在红绿色(RG)辨别能力上的差异并不显著(例如,皮克福德,1944年;胡德等人,2006年)。我们通过评估150名男性和150名女性在颜色评估与诊断(CAD)测试(罗德里格斯 - 卡尔莫纳等人,2005年)中的表现,重新审视了这个问题。这是一项灵敏的测试,能得出较小的颜色检测阈值。该测试采用嵌入随机、动态亮度对比噪声背景中的特定方向、移动的彩色刺激。采用四选一的强制选择程序来测量受试者在颜色空间16个方向上检测颜色信号的阈值,同时确保受试者无法利用任何残留的亮度对比信号。此外,我们在111名男性和114名女性的亚组中测量了瑞利色觉检查仪的匹配情况。通过一系列传统色觉测试诊断,所有年龄匹配的男性(30.8±9.7)和女性(26.7±8.8)色觉均正常。有已知色盲亲属的女性被排除在研究之外。男性和女性组之间的比较显示,色觉检查仪中点无显著差异(p = 0.709),但匹配范围有显著差异(p = 0.040);女性平均而言倾向于比男性有更大的平均范围(4.11)(男性为3.75)。沿着RG轴,女性的CAD阈值也显著高于男性(p = 0.0004),但在黄蓝(YB)辨别轴上并非如此。男性和女性在RG辨别上的差异可能与女性中常见的X连锁视锥细胞光色素表达的杂合性有关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验