Stein Joshua D, Ruiz David, Belsky Daniel, Lee Paul P, Sloan Frank A
Department of Ophthalmology, Kellogg Eye Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Ophthalmology. 2008 Jul;115(7):1109-1116.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.03.033.
To determine longitudinal rates of postoperative adverse outcomes after incisional glaucoma surgery in a nationally representative longitudinal sample.
Retrospective, longitudinal cohort analysis.
Medicare beneficiaries >or=68 years who underwent a primary trabeculectomy (PT), trabeculectomy with scarring (TS), or glaucoma drainage device (GDD) implantation from 1994 to 2003 with follow-up through 2005.
Primary trabeculectomy, TS, and GDD were identified from International Classification of Diseases (ICD-9-CM) and Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) procedure codes. Change in rates of postoperative adverse outcomes associated with these 3 surgical interventions was analyzed by cumulative incidence rates and Cox proportional hazards model regression; regression analysis controlled for prior adverse outcome measures (3-year run-up) and demographic variables.
First-, second-, and sixth-year cumulative rates and probability of experiencing serious adverse outcomes (retinal detachment, endophthalmitis, suprachoroidal hemorrhage), less serious adverse outcomes (choroidal detachment, corneal edema, hypotony), and receipt of additional glaucoma surgery were identified through Medicare claims for each treatment group.
At the 1-year follow-up, rates of severe adverse outcomes were higher among beneficiaries in the GDD group (2.0%) relative to the PT (0.6%) and TS groups (1.3%). Controlling for prior adverse outcomes to the surgery and demographic factors in Cox proportional analysis, differences were often reduced, but generally remained statistically and clinically significant. Rates of severe outcomes, less severe outcomes, corneal edema, and low vision/blindness were higher for persons undergoing GDD than PT or TS. However, rates of reoperation were higher for TS than GDD.
The risk for adverse outcomes was higher in GDD than in PT surgery or TS, controlling for a number of important case mix and demographic factors.
在一个具有全国代表性的纵向样本中,确定切口性青光眼手术后不良结局的纵向发生率。
回顾性纵向队列分析。
1994年至2003年接受原发性小梁切除术(PT)、伴有瘢痕形成的小梁切除术(TS)或青光眼引流装置(GDD)植入术且随访至2005年的68岁及以上医疗保险受益人。
从国际疾病分类(ICD-9-CM)和现行手术操作术语(CPT)手术编码中识别原发性小梁切除术、TS和GDD。通过累积发病率和Cox比例风险模型回归分析这3种手术干预相关的术后不良结局发生率的变化;回归分析控制了先前的不良结局指标(术前3年)和人口统计学变量。
通过各治疗组的医疗保险理赔记录,确定第1年、第2年和第6年严重不良结局(视网膜脱离、眼内炎、脉络膜上腔出血)、较不严重不良结局(脉络膜脱离、角膜水肿、低眼压)的累积发生率和发生概率,以及再次接受青光眼手术的情况。
在1年随访时,GDD组受益人的严重不良结局发生率(2.0%)高于PT组(0.6%)和TS组(%)。在Cox比例分析中控制手术前的不良结局和人口统计学因素后,差异通常会减小,但一般仍具有统计学和临床意义。接受GDD手术者的严重结局、较不严重结局、角膜水肿和低视力/失明的发生率高于PT组或TS组。然而,TS组的再次手术率高于GDD组。
在控制了一些重要的病例组合和人口统计学因素后,GDD手术的不良结局风险高于PT手术或TS手术。