Biglioli Federico, Colletti Giacomo
Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Milan, Italy.
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2008 Oct;36(7):378-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2008.05.001. Epub 2008 Jul 2.
Among maxillofacial surgeons, a general agreement exists that the therapeutic strategy for intracapsular condylar fractures is conservative, while the treatment of extracapsular fractures of the mandibular condyle is extremely controversial. The indications and choice of treatment are less than uniform, often relying on the surgeon's personal experience and beliefs. The literature increasingly suggests that the surgical management of these fractures is superior to conservative management in functional terms. Nonetheless, the indications for surgically treating condylar fractures are limited by fear of potential pitfalls related to the access. Extraoral routes to the condyle involve the risk of facial nerve injuries or visible scars; transoral access is free from these pitfalls but is demanding technically, especially for higher neck fractures. In our experience, a 2-cm-long retromandibular access allows straightforward management of condylar fractures, providing as a result a well concealed scar.
From 2006 to 2007, 21 patients with 25 condylar fractures were treated surgically using the mini-retromandibular access. The mean operating time was 32 min (range 17-55 min). No facial nerve injuries were observed. The first two patients developed postoperative infections. One patient, in whom the first intervention resulted in malreduction of the fracture because the access was insufficient (15 mm incision), required a second operation to achieve correct reduction and rigid fixation of the condyle.
In all cases, good anatomical stump reduction was achieved. All the patients obtained good articular function, since the access was exclusively extra-articular.
Condylar fracture reduction, fixation and healing can be managed comfortably using a limited retromandibular approach. Moreover, the risk of facial nerve injury is limited as the nerve fibres are viewed directly.
在颌面外科医生中,普遍认为髁状突囊内骨折的治疗策略是保守治疗,而下颌髁状突囊外骨折的治疗极具争议。治疗的适应证和选择并不统一,往往依赖于外科医生的个人经验和观点。越来越多的文献表明,从功能角度来看,这些骨折的手术治疗优于保守治疗。尽管如此,髁状突骨折手术治疗的适应证因担心与手术入路相关的潜在问题而受到限制。经口外途径到达髁状突有面神经损伤或可见瘢痕的风险;经口入路没有这些问题,但技术要求高,尤其是对于高位颈部骨折。根据我们的经验,下颌后入路2厘米长可直接处理髁状突骨折,从而形成隐蔽性良好的瘢痕。
2006年至2007年,21例患者的25处髁状突骨折采用微型下颌后入路进行手术治疗。平均手术时间为32分钟(范围17 - 55分钟)。未观察到面神经损伤。前两名患者发生术后感染。一名患者因手术入路不足(切口15毫米)首次干预导致骨折复位不良,需要二次手术以实现髁状突的正确复位和坚强固定。
所有病例均实现了良好的解剖复位。所有患者均获得了良好的关节功能,因为手术入路完全在关节外。
使用有限的下颌后入路可轻松实现髁状突骨折的复位、固定和愈合。此外,由于可直接观察神经纤维,面神经损伤的风险有限。