• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社区关怀有效吗?评估心理健康服务效果的模型。

Does community care work? A model to evaluate the effectiveness of mental health services.

机构信息

Dipartimento di Salute Mentale dell'Azienda Ospedaliera "G, Salvini", Garbagnate Milanese, Italy.

出版信息

Int J Ment Health Syst. 2008 Jul 5;2(1):10. doi: 10.1186/1752-4458-2-10.

DOI:10.1186/1752-4458-2-10
PMID:18601741
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2488329/
Abstract

The aim of this paper is to evaluate the effectiveness of community Mental Health Departments in Lombardy (Italy), and analyse the eventual differences in outcome produced by different packages of care. The survey was conducted in 2000 on 4,712 patients treated in ten Mental Health Departments. Patients were assessed at least twice in a year with HoNOS (Health of the Nation Outcome Scales). Data on treatment packages were drawn from the regional mental health information system, which includes all outpatient and day-care contacts, as well as general hospital and inpatient admissions provided by Mental Health Departments. Multilevel growth models were used for outcomes statistical analysis, expressed in terms of change of the total HoNOS score. On the whole, Mental Health Departments were effective in reducing HoNOS scores. The main predictor of improvement was treatment, while length of care, gender and diagnosis were weaker predictors. After severity adjustment, some packages of care proved more effective than others. Appropriate statistical methods, comprehensive treatment descriptions and routine outcome assessment tools are needed to evaluate the effectiveness of community mental health services in clinical settings.

摘要

本文旨在评估意大利伦巴第(Lombardy)社区心理健康部门的有效性,并分析不同护理方案所产生的结果差异。该调查于 2000 年对十家心理健康部门的 4712 名患者进行,患者在一年内至少接受两次 HoNOS(国民健康结果量表)评估。治疗方案的数据来自区域心理健康信息系统,其中包括所有门诊和日间护理接触、以及由心理健康部门提供的综合医院和住院治疗。使用多层次增长模型对治疗结果进行统计分析,以 HoNOS 总分变化表示。总的来说,心理健康部门在降低 HoNOS 评分方面非常有效。改善的主要预测因素是治疗,而护理时间、性别和诊断则是较弱的预测因素。经过严重程度调整后,一些护理方案比其他方案更有效。需要适当的统计方法、全面的治疗描述和常规的结果评估工具,以在临床环境中评估社区心理健康服务的有效性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8df3/2488329/b1608798d1e1/1752-4458-2-10-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8df3/2488329/131bf8b19b75/1752-4458-2-10-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8df3/2488329/129155b33561/1752-4458-2-10-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8df3/2488329/b1608798d1e1/1752-4458-2-10-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8df3/2488329/131bf8b19b75/1752-4458-2-10-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8df3/2488329/129155b33561/1752-4458-2-10-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8df3/2488329/b1608798d1e1/1752-4458-2-10-3.jpg

相似文献

1
Does community care work? A model to evaluate the effectiveness of mental health services.社区关怀有效吗?评估心理健康服务效果的模型。
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2008 Jul 5;2(1):10. doi: 10.1186/1752-4458-2-10.
2
[Packages of care in the departments of mental health in Lombardy].[伦巴第大区心理健康部门的护理套餐]
Epidemiol Psichiatr Soc. 2002 Apr-Jun;11(2):100-15. doi: 10.1017/s1121189x0000556x.
3
Consistency of the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS) at inpatient-to-community transition.国民健康结果量表(HoNOS)在住院到社区过渡阶段的一致性。
BMJ Open. 2016 Apr 27;6(4):e010732. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010732.
4
Systematic reviews of the effectiveness of day care for people with severe mental disorders: (1) acute day hospital versus admission; (2) vocational rehabilitation; (3) day hospital versus outpatient care.针对重度精神障碍患者日间护理效果的系统评价:(1)急性日间医院与住院治疗对比;(2)职业康复;(3)日间医院与门诊护理对比。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(21):1-75. doi: 10.3310/hta5210.
5
Which community care for patients with schizophrenic disorders? Packages of care provided by Departments of Mental Health in Lombardy (Italy).哪些社区为精神分裂症患者提供护理?意大利伦巴第大区心理健康部门提供的护理套餐。
Epidemiol Psichiatr Soc. 2007 Oct-Dec;16(4):330-8.
6
Health of the Nation Outcome Scales in a psychiatric inpatient setting: assessing clinical change.精神病住院环境中的国民健康结果量表:评估临床变化
J Eval Clin Pract. 2015 Apr;21(2):236-41. doi: 10.1111/jep.12296. Epub 2015 Feb 2.
7
The concurrent validity and sensitivity of change of the German version of the health of the nation outcome scales in a psychiatric inpatient setting.在精神病住院环境中,德国版国民健康结果量表变化的同时效度和敏感性。
Psychopathology. 2011;44(6):391-7. doi: 10.1159/000325172. Epub 2011 Sep 29.
8
Validation aspects of the health of the nation outcome scales.国民健康结果量表的验证方面。
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2011 Sep 6;5:20. doi: 10.1186/1752-4458-5-20.
9
Psychometric properties of the Dutch version of the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales for older adults (HoNOS 65+) in daily care.在日常护理中,荷兰版老年人健康国家结局量表(HoNOS 65+)的心理测量学特性。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2013 Dec;50(12):1711-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2013.05.004. Epub 2013 Jun 14.
10
Multilevel investigation of variation in HoNOS ratings by mental health professionals: a naturalistic study of consecutive referrals.心理健康专业人员对HoNOS评分差异的多层次调查:对连续转诊病例的自然主义研究。
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2004;13(3):152-64. doi: 10.1002/mpr.171.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of treatment for 6813 patients with mental health conditions in Cambridgeshire: a cross-sectional study.剑桥郡6813名心理健康状况患者的治疗效果:一项横断面研究。
BJPsych Open. 2020 Mar 20;6(2):e30. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2020.14.
2
Factors associated with use of community mental health services by schizophrenia patients using multilevel analysis.使用多层次分析研究精神分裂症患者使用社区心理健康服务的相关因素。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Oct 7;11:257. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-257.
3
Validation aspects of the health of the nation outcome scales.

本文引用的文献

1
Do adults in contact with Australia's public sector mental health services get better?与澳大利亚公共部门心理健康服务机构接触的成年人病情会好转吗?
Aust New Zealand Health Policy. 2006 Aug 30;3:9. doi: 10.1186/1743-8462-3-9.
2
Routine use of mental health outcome assessments: choosing the measure.心理健康结果评估的常规应用:选择评估方法
Br J Psychiatry. 2005 Feb;186:146-52. doi: 10.1192/bjp.186.2.146.
3
Demographic, clinical, social and service variables associated with higher needs for care in community psychiatric service patients. The South Verona Outcome Project 8.
国民健康结果量表的验证方面。
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2011 Sep 6;5:20. doi: 10.1186/1752-4458-5-20.
与社区精神科服务患者更高护理需求相关的人口统计学、临床、社会和服务变量。南维罗纳结果项目8。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2004 Jan;39(1):60-8. doi: 10.1007/s00127-004-0705-0.
4
[Packages of care in the departments of mental health in Lombardy].[伦巴第大区心理健康部门的护理套餐]
Epidemiol Psichiatr Soc. 2002 Apr-Jun;11(2):100-15. doi: 10.1017/s1121189x0000556x.
5
Outcomes research in mental health. Systematic review.心理健康领域的结果研究。系统评价。
Br J Psychiatry. 2002 Jul;181:8-16. doi: 10.1192/bjp.181.1.8.
6
Measuring mental health outcomes with pre-post designs.采用前后对照设计测量心理健康结果。
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2001 Aug;28(3):273-86. doi: 10.1007/BF02287244.
7
Risk adjustment of Florida mental health outcomes data: concepts, methods, and results.佛罗里达心理健康结果数据的风险调整:概念、方法与结果。
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2001 Aug;28(3):258-72. doi: 10.1007/BF02287243.
8
Risk-adjusted outcome models for public mental health outpatient programs.公共心理健康门诊项目的风险调整后结果模型。
Health Serv Res. 1999 Apr;34(1 Pt 1):171-95.
9
Assessing quality of care: administrative indicators and clinical outcomes in posttraumatic stress disorder.评估护理质量:创伤后应激障碍的管理指标与临床结果
Med Care. 1999 Feb;37(2):180-8. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199902000-00008.
10
Rationale and design. PRiSM Psychosis Study I.
Br J Psychiatry. 1998 Nov;173:363-70. doi: 10.1192/bjp.173.5.363.