Suppr超能文献

胆结石的体外破碎:液电、电磁和压电冲击波碎石机的比较

In vitro fragmentation of gallstones: comparison of electrohydraulic, electromagnetic and piezoelectric shockwave lithotripters.

作者信息

Schneider H T, Fromm M, Ott R, Janowitz P, Swobodnik W, Neuhaus H, Ell C

机构信息

Department of Medicine I, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Federal Republic of Germany.

出版信息

Hepatology. 1991 Aug;14(2):301-5.

PMID:1860686
Abstract

To compare the fragmentation efficiency of three different shockwave systems, 63 human gallstone triplets were disintegrated in vitro using an electrohydraulic (MPL 9000, Dornier), an electromagnetic (Lithostar Plus, Siemens) and a piezoelectric (Piezolith 2300, R. Wolf) lithotripter. Since each stone triplet was obtained from the same gallbladder, the concrements of one such set were identical in physicochemical parameters. According to the maximal diameter, the calculi were divided into group A (6 to 15 mm) and group B (16 to 30 mm). Shockwave application was terminated when residual fragments measured 4 mm or less. Forty-five triplets were fragmented at energy settings mainly used in clinical treatment of patients with gallbladder stones (MPL 9000: 20 kV; Lithostar Plus: setting 9 (maximal); Piezolith 2300: setting 3). The fragmentation endpoint was achieved in group A (n = 3 x 36) with the Piezolith 2300 after median 150 (range = 50 to 500) pulses and with the Lithostar Plus after 150 (50 to 750) pulses compared with 500 (50 to 1,500) pulses using the MPL 9000 (p less than 0.01). In group B (n = 3 x 9) the Lithostar Plus (median = 750, range = 250 to 1,250 pluses) required fewer discharges than the Piezolith 2300 (1,250, 250 to 2,500 pulses; p less than 0.05) and the MPL (1,500, 500 to 1,600 [upper limit] pulses; p less than 0.01).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

为比较三种不同冲击波系统的碎石效率,使用液电式(MPL 9000,多尼尔公司)、电磁式(Lithostar Plus,西门子公司)和压电式(Piezolith 2300,R. 沃尔夫公司)碎石机对63组人体胆囊结石三联体进行体外碎石。由于每组结石三联体均取自同一个胆囊,所以一组中的结石在理化参数上是相同的。根据最大直径,结石被分为A组(6至15毫米)和B组(16至30毫米)。当残余碎片测量值为4毫米或更小时,停止冲击波施加。45组三联体在主要用于胆囊结石患者临床治疗的能量设置下进行碎石(MPL 9000:20千伏;Lithostar Plus:设置9(最大值);Piezolith 2300:设置3)。A组(n = 3×36)使用Piezolith 2300在中位150次(范围 = 50至500次)脉冲后达到碎石终点,使用Lithostar Plus在150次(50至750次)脉冲后达到,而使用MPL 9000则需要500次(50至1500次)脉冲(p小于0.01)。在B组(n = 3×9)中,Lithostar Plus(中位值 = 750次,范围 = 250至1250次脉冲)所需的放电次数比Piezolith 2300(1250次,250至2500次脉冲;p小于0.05)和MPL(1500次,500至1600次[上限]脉冲;p小于0.01)少。(摘要截选至250词)

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验