Toomey Joseph A, Kucharski L Thomas, Duncan Scott
John Jay College of Criminal Justice, Forensic Psychology Department, New York, NY 10019, USA.
Assessment. 2009 Mar;16(1):115-21. doi: 10.1177/1073191108319713. Epub 2008 Jul 7.
This study examined the utility of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2's (MMPI-2) malingering discriminant function index (M-DFI), recently developed by Bacchiochi and Bagby, in the detection of malingering in a forensic sample. Criminal defendants were divided into "malingering" and "not malingering" groups using the structured interview of reported symptoms (SIRS) criteria proposed by Rogers. Logistic regression analysis (LRA) revealed that the MMPI-2 infrequency (F) scale had the best predictive utility of the traditional infrequency scales. Although the M-DFI did significantly differentiate the malingering from the not malingering groups, it did not add significantly to the predictive utility of the MMPI-2 F scale. Receiver operating characteristics analyses demonstrated acceptable sensitivity and specificity for the MMPI-2 F scale, but poor sensitivity for the M-DFI scale. The results are discussed in terms of the utility of the M-DFI in detecting malingering and problems of extending the findings of simulation studies to the forensic context.
本研究考察了近期由巴基奥基和巴格比开发的明尼苏达多相人格问卷第二版(MMPI - 2)的诈病判别功能指数(M - DFI)在法医样本中检测诈病的效用。根据罗杰斯提出的报告症状结构化访谈(SIRS)标准,将刑事被告分为“诈病”组和“非诈病”组。逻辑回归分析(LRA)显示,MMPI - 2的低频(F)量表在传统低频量表中具有最佳的预测效用。尽管M - DFI确实显著区分了诈病组和非诈病组,但它并未显著增加MMPI - 2 F量表的预测效用。接受者操作特征分析表明,MMPI - 2 F量表具有可接受的敏感性和特异性,但M - DFI量表的敏感性较差。本文从M - DFI在检测诈病中的效用以及将模拟研究结果扩展到法医背景的问题方面对结果进行了讨论。