Suppr超能文献

糖尿病胃轻瘫中胃电刺激的中枢神经机制

Central neuronal mechanisms of gastric electrical stimulation in diabetic gastroparesis.

作者信息

Frøkjaer Jens B, Ejskjaer Niels, Rask Peter, Andersen Søren Due, Gregersen Hans, Drewes Asbjørn M, Funch-Jensen Peter

机构信息

Center for Visceral Biomechanics and Pain, Aalborg Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.

出版信息

Scand J Gastroenterol. 2008;43(9):1066-75. doi: 10.1080/00365520802028221.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The mechanisms underlying symptom improvement in gastric electrical stimulation (GES) are not fully understood. Modulation of the central nervous system excitability may be involved. The objective of the study was to investigate the central effects of GES, including the possible modulation of the visceral sensory nervous system.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A gastric electrical stimulator was implanted in seven diabetic patients with medically refractory gastroparesis. A double-blinded protocol was used to investigate the patients at baseline and one month after recovery with the stimulator turned on and off (1-month periods). The following assessments were carried out: mechanical, thermal and electrical stimulations with sensory recordings in the esophagus and duodenum, and standardized, self-administered, daily symptom questionnaires.

RESULTS

No difference was found between baseline and the on- and off periods in overall gut pain thresholds across all stimulus modalities in the esophagus (p=0.63), duodenum (p=0.19) or esophagus and duodenum combined (p=0.76). No difference in the sensory response to mechanical stimulation was found in the esophagus before (all p>0.31) and after (all p>0.43) smooth muscle relaxation with butylscopolamine. Similar findings were observed in the duodenum. No differences were found in thermal sensitivity (esophagus (p=0.67) and duodenum (p=0.17)), sensory response to electrical stimulation (esophagus (p=0.57) and duodenum (p=0.52)) or induced somatic referred pain areas (esophagus (p=0.75) and duodenum (p=0.51)). No difference was seen in the induced somatic referred pain areas or self-reported symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

No evidence was found for GES-induced modulation of the visceral sensory system and central excitability. However, GES has been proven to modulate the central nervous system in animal studies, necessitating further human experiments in order unambiguously to establish the possible central effects of GES.

摘要

目的

胃电刺激(GES)症状改善的潜在机制尚未完全明确。中枢神经系统兴奋性的调节可能与之有关。本研究的目的是探究GES的中枢效应,包括对内脏感觉神经系统的可能调节作用。

材料与方法

将胃电刺激器植入7例药物治疗无效的糖尿病性胃轻瘫患者体内。采用双盲方案,在基线期以及刺激器开启和关闭的恢复1个月后(各为期1个月)对患者进行研究。进行了以下评估:对食管和十二指肠进行机械、热和电刺激并记录感觉,以及标准化的、患者自行填写的每日症状问卷。

结果

在食管(p = 0.63)、十二指肠(p = 0.19)或食管和十二指肠联合(p = 0.76)的所有刺激方式下,基线期与刺激器开启和关闭期之间的总体肠道疼痛阈值均未发现差异。在使用丁溴东莨菪碱使平滑肌松弛之前(所有p>0.31)和之后(所有p>0.43),食管对机械刺激的感觉反应均未发现差异。十二指肠也观察到类似结果。热敏感性(食管(p = 0.67)和十二指肠(p = 0.17))、对电刺激的感觉反应(食管(p = 0.57)和十二指肠(p = 0.52))或诱发的躯体牵涉痛区域(食管(p = 0.75)和十二指肠(p = 0.51))均未发现差异。诱发躯体牵涉痛区域或自我报告症状也未发现差异。

结论

未发现GES对内脏感觉系统和中枢兴奋性有调节作用的证据。然而,在动物研究中已证明GES可调节中枢神经系统,因此需要进一步的人体实验以明确确定GES可能的中枢效应。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验