Courtney Jon R, Hubbard Timothy L
Texas Christian University, Fort Worth, TX 76129, USA.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2008;61(12):1778-84. doi: 10.1080/17470210802194217. Epub 2008 Jun 19.
Freyd (1987; Finke & Freyd, 1985) suggested that representational momentum (i.e., forward displacement in memory for the location of a moving target) is impervious to error feedback (i.e., is modular or cognitively impenetrable), but studies supporting this claim might not have allowed sufficient opportunity for learning to occur. In the experiment reported here, participants were (a) naive regarding representational momentum, (b) informed about representational momentum but not instructed to counteract it, or (c) informed about representational momentum and instructed to counteract it. All participants exhibited significant displacement. However, participants informed about representational momentum exhibited less forward displacement than did naive participants due to a greater tendency to respond same to probes behind the true--same position. Possible mechanisms of compensation and the notion that displacement reflects both modular (cognitively impenetrable) and nonmodular (cognitively penetrable) components are addressed.
弗雷德(1987年;芬克与弗雷德,1985年)提出,表象动量(即对移动目标位置的记忆中的向前位移)不受错误反馈的影响(即具有模块性或认知不可穿透性),但支持这一说法的研究可能没有为学习的发生留出足够的机会。在本文所报告的实验中,参与者被分为以下三组:(a)对表象动量一无所知;(b)被告知表象动量,但未被指示去抵消它;或(c)被告知表象动量并被指示去抵消它。所有参与者都表现出了显著的位移。然而,由于对真实相同位置后方的探测做出相同反应的倾向更强,被告知表象动量的参与者比一无所知的参与者表现出的向前位移更少。文中探讨了可能的补偿机制以及位移反映模块性(认知不可穿透性)和非模块性(认知可穿透性)成分这一观点。