Perfect Timothy J, Weston Nicola J, Dennis Ian, Snell Amelia
School of Psychology, University of Plymouth, Plymouth PL4 8AA, UK.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2008 Oct;61(10):1479-86. doi: 10.1080/17470210802034678.
Macrae and Lewis (2002) showed that repeated reporting of the global dimension of Navon stimuli improved performance in a subsequent face identification task, whilst reporting the features of the Navon stimuli impaired performance. Using a face composite task, which is assumed to require featural processing, Weston and Perfect (2005) showed the complementary pattern: Featural responding to Navon letters speeded performance. However, both studies used Navon stimuli with global precedence, in which the overall configuration is easier to report than the features. Here we replicate the two studies above, whilst manipulating the precedence (global or featural) of the letter stimuli in the orientation task. Both studies replicated the previously reported findings with global precedence stimuli, but showed the reverse pattern with local precedence stimuli. These data raise important questions as to what is transferred between the Navon orientation task and the face-processing tasks that follow.
麦克雷和刘易斯(2002年)表明,重复报告纳冯刺激的整体维度会提高后续面部识别任务的表现,而报告纳冯刺激的特征则会损害表现。韦斯顿和珀费克特(2005年)使用了一个假定需要特征处理的面部合成任务,展示了互补模式:对纳冯字母的特征反应加快了表现。然而,这两项研究都使用了具有全局优先性的纳冯刺激,其中整体构型比特征更容易报告。在这里,我们重复上述两项研究,同时在定向任务中操纵字母刺激的优先性(全局或特征)。两项研究都重复了先前关于全局优先性刺激的研究结果,但在局部优先性刺激下呈现出相反的模式。这些数据就纳冯定向任务和后续面部处理任务之间转移了什么提出了重要问题。