Lipscomb H J, Cameron W, Silverstein B
Division of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Department of Community and Family Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Occup Environ Med. 2008 Dec;65(12):827-34. doi: 10.1136/oem.2008.039222. Epub 2008 Jul 8.
To describe incident and recurrent work-related back injuries among union carpenters, describe the hazard function for each and associated risk factors, and explore predictors of subsequent musculoskeletal back injury based on different definitions of the initial injury.
This study identified a dynamic cohort of 18 768 carpenters who worked in the State of Washington 1989-2003, their hours worked each month, and their work-related back injuries and medical claims for treatment including ICD-9 codes. Using Poisson regression we calculated rates and rate ratios (RRs) of incident and recurrent injury adjusting for age, gender, union tenure and type of carpentry work. Predictors of subsequent musculoskeletal back injury were explored based on different definitions of the incident injury, as were time periods of greatest risk following return to work.
Recurrent back injuries occurred at a rate 80% higher than initial injuries. Survival curves were significantly different for incident and recurrent injuries, but patterns of relative risk were similar. Individuals with greatest union tenure were at lowest risk, likely reflecting a healthy worker effect or lower physical exposures with seniority. Individuals with long periods of work disability with their first injury were at particularly high risk of subsequent musculoskeletal injury compared with those with no prior history (RR 2.3; 95% CI 2.0 to 2.7), as were individuals with degenerative diagnoses (RR 2.0; 95% CI 1.5 to 2.6). Risk for second injury peaked between 1000 and 1500 h after return to work and then gradually declined.
Carpenters with long periods of work disability following back injury warrant accommodation and perhaps better rehabilitation efforts to avoid re-injury. Challenges to workplace accommodation and limited ability to clearly define readiness to return to work following injury demonstrate the need for primary prevention of back injuries through attention to engineering solutions among carpenters involved in strenuous work.
描述工会木工中与工作相关的新发和复发性背部损伤情况,描述每种损伤的风险函数及相关危险因素,并基于初始损伤的不同定义探索后续肌肉骨骼背部损伤的预测因素。
本研究确定了一个动态队列,其中包括1989年至2003年在华盛顿州工作的18768名木工,他们每月的工作时长,以及与工作相关的背部损伤和包括国际疾病分类第九版(ICD - 9)编码在内的治疗医疗索赔。我们使用泊松回归计算新发和复发性损伤的发生率及率比(RRs),并对年龄、性别、工会任期和木工工作类型进行调整。基于新发损伤的不同定义,探索后续肌肉骨骼背部损伤的预测因素,以及重返工作岗位后风险最高的时间段。
复发性背部损伤的发生率比初次损伤高80%。新发损伤和复发性损伤的生存曲线有显著差异,但相对风险模式相似。工会任期最长的个体风险最低,这可能反映了健康工人效应或随着工龄增长身体暴露减少。与无既往病史的个体相比,首次受伤后长期工作残疾的个体后续发生肌肉骨骼损伤的风险特别高(RR 2.3;95%可信区间2.0至2.7),患有退行性疾病诊断的个体也是如此(RR 2.0;95%可信区间1.5至2.6)。第二次受伤的风险在重返工作岗位后的1000至1500小时达到峰值,然后逐渐下降。
背部受伤后长期工作残疾的木工需要得到工作调整,或许还需要更好的康复措施以避免再次受伤。工作场所调整面临的挑战以及在明确界定受伤后重返工作岗位的准备情况方面能力有限,表明需要通过关注从事繁重工作的木工的工程解决方案来进行背部损伤的一级预防。