• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

谁能为急症患者发声?测试一种识别社区及其领导者的方法。

Who can speak for the emergently ill? Testing a method to identify communities and their leaders.

作者信息

Merchant Raina M, Rubright Jonathan D, Pryor John P, Karlawish Jason H T

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

出版信息

Acad Emerg Med. 2008 Jun;15(6):581-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00134.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00134.x
PMID:18616449
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) requires researchers to consult with the community prior to conducting research with exception from informed consent, but little is known about whether people support this and, if they do, who researchers should consult. We sought to determine if people could identify communities and leaders of those communities who researchers should consult with to represent their views about research that requires an exception from informed consent.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional interview study using a convenience sample of patients seeking care in an urban emergency department (ED) to determine if people belonged to specific communities and, if they did, if they could identify communities and leaders appropriate for consultation. Descriptive statistics were used to represent our findings.

RESULTS

Most of the 262 participants approached for the study completed the interview (199; 76%). Of those interviewed, 122 (61%) were African American, 54 (27%) were white, 83 (42%) were male, and the mean (+/-standard deviation [SD]) age was 36.2 +/- 14.4 years. Most, (194; 97%), identified that they belonged to a community and most (177; 89%), said that researchers could consult at least one of their communities for consultation about an exception from informed consent study. Participants typically named geographic and religious-affiliated communities and leaders as appropriate for consultation.

CONCLUSION

Most participants identified a community and a leader of that community who researchers could consult about research with exception from informed consent. Geographic and faith-based organizations could play an important role in consultation.

摘要

目的

美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)要求研究人员在开展免除知情同意的研究之前与社区进行协商,但对于人们是否支持这一点以及如果支持的话研究人员应该与谁协商,我们知之甚少。我们试图确定人们是否能够识别出研究人员应该与之协商以代表他们对需要免除知情同意的研究的看法的社区及其领导者。

方法

我们使用便利抽样法,对在城市急诊科寻求治疗的患者进行了横断面访谈研究,以确定人们是否属于特定社区,如果属于,他们是否能够识别出适合进行协商的社区及其领导者。描述性统计用于呈现我们的研究结果。

结果

参与该研究的262名参与者中,大多数(199名;76%)完成了访谈。在接受访谈的人中,122人(61%)是非裔美国人,54人(27%)是白人,83人(42%)是男性,平均年龄(±标准差[SD])为36.2±14.4岁。大多数人(194人;97%)表示他们属于某个社区,大多数人(177人;89%)表示研究人员可以就免除知情同意的研究向他们所属的至少一个社区进行咨询。参与者通常提名地理和宗教相关社区及其领导者为适合咨询的对象。

结论

大多数参与者识别出了一个社区及其领导者,研究人员可以就免除知情同意的研究向他们进行咨询。地理和基于信仰的组织在咨询过程中可以发挥重要作用。

相似文献

1
Who can speak for the emergently ill? Testing a method to identify communities and their leaders.谁能为急症患者发声?测试一种识别社区及其领导者的方法。
Acad Emerg Med. 2008 Jun;15(6):581-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00134.x.
2
Communicating with communities about emergency research.就应急研究与社区进行沟通。
Acad Emerg Med. 2005 Nov;12(11):1064-70. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2005.06.018.
3
Emergency research: using exception from informed consent, evaluation of community consultations.紧急研究:使用知情同意豁免,评估社区咨询。
Acad Emerg Med. 2013 Jan;20(1):98-103. doi: 10.1111/acem.12039.
4
Exception from informed consent: viewpoint of institutional review boards--balancing risks to subjects, community consultation, and future directions.知情同意的例外情况:机构审查委员会的观点——平衡对受试者的风险、社区咨询及未来方向
Acad Emerg Med. 2005 Nov;12(11):1050-5. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2005.06.015.
5
Does the emergency exception from informed consent process protect research subjects?知情同意程序的紧急例外情况是否能保护研究对象?
Acad Emerg Med. 2005 Nov;12(11):1056-9. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2005.07.001.
6
Exception from informed consent enrollment in emergency medical research: attitudes and awareness.紧急医学研究中知情同意入组的例外情况:态度与认知
Acad Emerg Med. 2007 Feb;14(2):187-91. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2006.08.019.
7
Researchers' understanding of the federal guidelines for waiver of and exception from informed consent.研究人员对联邦关于知情同意书豁免与例外的指导方针的理解。
Acad Emerg Med. 2005 Nov;12(11):1045-9. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2005.06.013.
8
Views of US researchers about informed consent in international collaborative research.美国研究人员对国际合作研究中知情同意的看法。
Soc Sci Med. 2005 Sep;61(6):1211-22. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.02.004. Epub 2005 Apr 9.
9
Research conditions that qualify for emergency exception from informed consent.符合知情同意紧急例外情况的研究条件。
Acad Emerg Med. 2005 Nov;12(11):1040-4. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2005.06.022.
10
Using the exception from informed consent regulations in research.在研究中使用知情同意法规的例外情况。
Acad Emerg Med. 2005 Nov;12(11):1031-9. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2005.06.021.

引用本文的文献

1
Meeting unique requirements: Community consultation and public disclosure for research in emergency setting using exception from informed consent.满足特殊需求:在紧急情况下使用免除知情同意的例外情况下进行研究的社区咨询和公开披露。
Acad Emerg Med. 2021 Oct;28(10):1183-1194. doi: 10.1111/acem.14264. Epub 2021 May 26.
2
Exceptions to the rule of informed consent for research with an intervention.针对有干预措施的研究的知情同意规则的例外情况。
BMC Med Ethics. 2016 Feb 6;17:9. doi: 10.1186/s12910-016-0092-6.
3
Consulting communities when patients cannot consent: a multicenter study of community consultation for research in emergency settings.
在患者无法同意的情况下咨询社区:一项关于在紧急情况下进行研究的社区咨询的多中心研究。
Crit Care Med. 2014 Feb;42(2):272-80. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182a27759.