Zampieri Nicola, Pianezzola Emanuela, Zampieri Cecilia
Department of Surgical Sciences, Pediatric Surgical Unit, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Acta Paediatr. 2008 Sep;97(9):1305-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2008.00917.x.
In this study, we examine the evolution of tradition concerning infant male circumcision, utilizing evidence from classical medical texts as well as information from literature, legal sources and art.
We examined the differences in the representation of male circumcision between ancient times and the modern era.
Through the ages, male circumcision has been differently represented, and at present an interesting representation is born following the natural evolution of society.
Based on the fact that the foreskin is not a defect, the impact of male circumcision is on the child's rights and its role during first years of life still remains controversial.
在本研究中，我们利用古典医学文献中的证据以及来自文学、法律资料和艺术作品中的信息，考察关于男性婴儿包皮环切术传统的演变。
我们研究了古代与现代对男性包皮环切术表述的差异。
多年来，男性包皮环切术有着不同的表述，而目前随着社会的自然演变，一种有趣的表述出现了。
基于包皮并非缺陷这一事实，男性包皮环切术对儿童权利的影响及其在儿童生命最初几年中的作用仍存在争议。
