• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

替加色罗治疗运动障碍样功能性消化不良:两项随机对照试验的结果

Tegaserod treatment for dysmotility-like functional dyspepsia: results of two randomized, controlled trials.

作者信息

Vakil Nimish, Laine Loren, Talley Nicholas J, Zakko Salam F, Tack Jan, Chey William D, Kralstein Jeffrey, Earnest David L, Ligozio Gregory, Cohard-Radice Marielle

机构信息

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin and Marquette University College of Health Sciences, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53233, USA.

出版信息

Am J Gastroenterol. 2008 Aug;103(8):1906-19. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2008.01953.x. Epub 2008 Jul 4.

DOI:10.1111/j.1572-0241.2008.01953.x
PMID:18616658
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Therapies for dysmotility-like functional dyspepsia (FD) are limited. We studied tegaserod, a selective serotonin type 4 receptor agonist, in patients with FD.

METHODS

Two identical multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials enrolled women >/=18 yr with recurring mid-upper abdominal discomfort characterized by postprandial fullness, early satiety, and/or bloating. Patients were randomized to tegaserod 6 mg b.i.d. or placebo. Two patient-reported primary variables were assessed: percentage of days with satisfactory symptom relief, and symptom severity using the composite average daily severity score (CADSS).

RESULTS

In total, 2,667 women were randomized with no differences between trials in terms of recruitment method, Helicobacter pylori status, heartburn, or medication use. Mean percentage of days with satisfactory symptom relief for tegaserod versus placebo in Trial 1: 32.2%versus 26.6% (95% CI of treatment difference 2.82, 9.27; P < 0.01), Trial 2: 31.9%versus 29.4% (95% CI of treatment difference -0.21, 6.53; P= 0.066). Mean CADSS in Trial 1: 3.14 versus 3.35 (95% CI of treatment difference -0.29, -0.10; P < 0.0001), Trial 2: 3.15 versus 3.23 (95% CI of treatment difference -0.18, 0.01; P= 0.094). Meta-analysis showed significant benefit for both end points: increase in days with satisfactory relief 4.6% (95% CI 2.29, 6.96); decrease in CADSS 0.14 (95% CI 0.21, 0.07). Treatment effect was greater in patients with severe baseline symptoms. Diarrhea requiring study discontinuation was more common with tegaserod than placebo (4.1%vs 0.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

Some improvement in dysmotility-like FD was observed with tegaserod treatment. The clinical implication of this improvement is uncertain.

摘要

目的

动力障碍样功能性消化不良(FD)的治疗方法有限。我们对替加色罗(一种选择性5-羟色胺4型受体激动剂)在FD患者中的疗效进行了研究。

方法

两项相同的多中心、双盲、随机、安慰剂对照试验纳入了年龄≥18岁、反复出现中上腹不适(表现为餐后饱胀、早饱及/或腹胀)的女性患者。患者被随机分为替加色罗6mg每日两次组或安慰剂组。评估了两个患者报告的主要变量:症状缓解满意天数的百分比,以及使用综合平均每日严重程度评分(CADSS)评估的症状严重程度。

结果

共有2667名女性被随机分组,两项试验在招募方法、幽门螺杆菌感染状况、烧心或用药情况方面无差异。试验1中,替加色罗组与安慰剂组症状缓解满意天数的平均百分比分别为32.2%和26.6%(治疗差异的95%CI为2.82, 9.27;P<0.01),试验2中分别为31.9%和29.4%(治疗差异的95%CI为-0.21, 6.53;P = 0.066)。试验1中CADSS的平均值分别为3.14和3.35(治疗差异的95%CI为-0.29, -0.10;P<0.0001),试验2中分别为3.15和3.23(治疗差异的95%CI为-0.18, 0.01;P = 0.094)。荟萃分析显示,两个终点均有显著益处:症状缓解满意天数增加4.6%(95%CI为2.29, 6.96);CADSS降低0.14(95%CI为0.21, 0.07)。在基线症状严重的患者中治疗效果更佳。因腹泻而需要停药的情况在替加色罗组比安慰剂组更常见(4.1%对0.3%)。

结论

替加色罗治疗动力障碍样FD有一定改善。这种改善的临床意义尚不确定。

相似文献

1
Tegaserod treatment for dysmotility-like functional dyspepsia: results of two randomized, controlled trials.替加色罗治疗运动障碍样功能性消化不良:两项随机对照试验的结果
Am J Gastroenterol. 2008 Aug;103(8):1906-19. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2008.01953.x. Epub 2008 Jul 4.
2
Tegaserod in patients with mechanical sensitivity and overlapping symptoms of functional heartburn and functional dyspepsia.替加色罗用于治疗具有机械性敏感以及功能性烧心和功能性消化不良重叠症状的患者。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2008 Aug;24(8):2159-72. doi: 10.1185/03007990802222832. Epub 2008 Jun 17.
3
Effect of tegaserod on esophageal pain threshold, regurgitation, and symptom relief in patients with functional heartburn and mechanical sensitivity.替加色罗对功能性烧心和机械敏感性患者食管疼痛阈值、反流及症状缓解的影响
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006 Apr;4(4):442-50. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2006.01.014.
4
Efficacy of the 5-HT1A agonist tandospirone citrate in improving symptoms of patients with functional dyspepsia: a randomized controlled trial.5-羟色胺1A受体激动剂枸橼酸坦度螺酮改善功能性消化不良患者症状的疗效:一项随机对照试验。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2009 Nov;104(11):2779-87. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2009.427. Epub 2009 Jul 28.
5
Tegaserod for female patients suffering from IBS with mixed bowel habits or constipation: a randomized controlled trial.替加色罗用于患有混合型排便习惯或便秘的肠易激综合征女性患者:一项随机对照试验。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2008 May;103(5):1217-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2008.01808.x.
6
Clinical trial: effects of tegaserod on gastric motor and sensory function in patients with functional dyspepsia.临床试验:替加色罗对功能性消化不良患者胃运动和感觉功能的影响
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007 Nov 15;26(10):1399-407. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2007.03521.x. Epub 2007 Sep 24.
7
Itopride in functional dyspepsia: results of two phase III multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials.伊托必利治疗功能性消化不良:两项III期多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验的结果
Gut. 2008 Jun;57(6):740-6. doi: 10.1136/gut.2007.132449. Epub 2007 Oct 26.
8
Tegaserod for the treatment of chronic constipation: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multinational study.替加色罗治疗慢性便秘:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的多国研究。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2005 Feb;100(2):362-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.40749.x.
9
A placebo-controlled trial of the 5-HT1A agonist R-137696 on symptoms, visceral hypersensitivity and on impaired accommodation in functional dyspepsia.5-HT1A激动剂R-137696对功能性消化不良症状、内脏高敏感性及调节功能受损的安慰剂对照试验。
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2009 Jun;21(6):619-26, e23-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2008.01260.x. Epub 2009 Feb 11.
10
Efficacy of tegaserod in chronic constipation in men.替加色罗对男性慢性便秘的疗效。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2007 Feb;102(2):362-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00988.x. Epub 2006 Dec 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Comprehensive Treatment of Functional Dyspepsia Using Traditional Chinese Medicine: A Review Based on Pathophysiological Perspectives.基于病理生理学视角的功能性消化不良的中医综合治疗:一篇综述
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2025 Jun 24;19:5349-5367. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S514042. eCollection 2025.
2
The effect of therapeutic massage combined with conventional therapy in children with functional dyspepsia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.治疗性按摩联合传统疗法对功能性消化不良儿童的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Front Pharmacol. 2025 Apr 16;16:1554438. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1554438. eCollection 2025.
3
The gut-brain axis and pain signalling mechanisms in the gastrointestinal tract.
肠道-脑轴与胃肠道中的疼痛信号传导机制。
Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2025 Mar;22(3):206-221. doi: 10.1038/s41575-024-01017-9. Epub 2024 Nov 22.
4
Chronic Visceral Pain: New Peripheral Mechanistic Insights and Resulting Treatments.慢性内脏痛:新的外周机制见解及由此产生的治疗方法。
Gastroenterology. 2024 Jun;166(6):976-994. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2024.01.045. Epub 2024 Feb 5.
5
Reconsideration of the Gastroparetic Syndrome.胃轻瘫综合征的再思考。
Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2023 Apr;25(4):75-90. doi: 10.1007/s11894-023-00865-w. Epub 2023 Apr 1.
6
Placebo response in pharmacological trials in patients with functional dyspepsia-A systematic review and meta-analysis.安慰剂效应在功能性消化不良患者药物临床试验中的作用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2023 Feb;35(2):e14474. doi: 10.1111/nmo.14474. Epub 2022 Sep 27.
7
British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines on the management of functional dyspepsia.英国胃肠病学会功能性消化不良管理指南。
Gut. 2022 Sep;71(9):1697-1723. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2022-327737. Epub 2022 Jul 7.
8
Treatment of Gastrointestinal Disorders-Plants and Potential Mechanisms of Action of Their Constituents.胃肠道紊乱的治疗——植物及其成分的作用机制与潜在用途。
Molecules. 2022 Apr 30;27(9):2881. doi: 10.3390/molecules27092881.
9
Effectiveness of Nutritional Ingredients on Upper Gastrointestinal Conditions and Symptoms: A Narrative Review.营养成分对上消化道状况和症状的影响:叙事性综述。
Nutrients. 2022 Feb 5;14(3):672. doi: 10.3390/nu14030672.
10
Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for functional dyspepsia 2021.2021 年功能性消化不良的循证临床实践指南。
J Gastroenterol. 2022 Feb;57(2):47-61. doi: 10.1007/s00535-021-01843-7. Epub 2022 Jan 21.