Suppr超能文献

对外科医生科学家发表偏倚的评估。

Assessment of publication bias for the surgeon scientist.

作者信息

Mahid S S, Qadan M, Hornung C A, Galandiuk S

机构信息

Price Institute of Surgical Research and Section of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Louisville, Kentucky, USA.

出版信息

Br J Surg. 2008 Aug;95(8):943-9. doi: 10.1002/bjs.6302.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Publication bias occurs when statistically non-significant (negative) findings are not published. It can profoundly affect the results of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

METHODS

Qualitative and quantitative methods of detecting publication bias are described, including their advantages and disadvantages.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

Accepted quality standards for the reporting of meta-analyses recommend assessment of publication bias, but currently there is no uniform standard for reporting. Quantitative methods are being used with increasing frequency. Authors should take steps to minimize publication bias, and use both qualitative and quantitative assessment methods to determine whether it is present.

摘要

背景

当统计学上无显著性差异(阴性)的研究结果未被发表时,就会出现发表偏倚。它会深刻影响系统评价和荟萃分析的结果。

方法

描述了检测发表偏倚的定性和定量方法,包括其优缺点。

结果与结论

荟萃分析报告公认的质量标准建议对发表偏倚进行评估,但目前尚无统一的报告标准。定量方法的使用频率越来越高。作者应采取措施尽量减少发表偏倚,并使用定性和定量评估方法来确定是否存在发表偏倚。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验