Meta 流行病学。
Meta-epidemiology.
机构信息
Department of Preventive Medicine, Jeju National University School of Medicine, JeJu, Korea.
出版信息
Epidemiol Health. 2014 Sep 25;36:e2014019. doi: 10.4178/epih/e2014019. eCollection 2014.
Abstract
The concept of meta-epidemiology has been introduced with considering the methodological limitations of systematic review for intervention trials. The paradigm of meta-epidemiology has shifted from a statistical method into a new methodology to close gaps between evidence and practice. Main interest of meta-epidemiology is to control potential biases in previous quantitative systematic reviews and draw appropriate evidences for establishing evidence-base guidelines. Nowadays, the network meta-epidemiology was suggested in order to overcome some limitations of meta-epidemiology. To activate meta-epidemiologic studies, implementation of tools for risk of bias and reporting guidelines such as the Consolidated Standards for Reporting Trials (CONSORT) should be done.
摘要
元流行病学的概念是在考虑系统评价干预试验的方法学局限性的基础上提出的。元流行病学的范例已经从一种统计方法转变为一种新的方法，以缩小证据与实践之间的差距。元流行病学的主要目的是控制以前定量系统评价中的潜在偏差，并为制定基于证据的指南提供适当的证据。如今，已经提出了网络元流行病学，以克服元流行病学的一些局限性。为了开展元流行病学研究，应该实施工具来评估偏倚风险和报告指南，如 CONSORT（CONsolidated Standards of Reporting Trials）。
相似文献
1
Meta-epidemiology.
Epidemiol Health. 2014 Sep 25;36:e2014019. doi: 10.4178/epih/e2014019. eCollection 2014.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
4
Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
Pain Physician. 2009 Sep-Oct;12(5):819-50.
5
Bias due to selective inclusion and reporting of outcomes and analyses in systematic reviews of randomised trials of healthcare interventions.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Oct 1;2014(10):MR000035. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000035.pub2.
6
Assessing the quality of studies in meta-research: Review/guidelines on the most important quality assessment tools.
Pharm Stat. 2021 Jan;20(1):185-195. doi: 10.1002/pst.2068. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
7
Consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) and the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in medical journals.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Nov 14;11(11):MR000030. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000030.pub2.
8
Recommendations and evidence for reporting items in pediatric clinical trial protocols and reports: two systematic reviews.
Trials. 2015 Sep 18;16:417. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0954-0.
9
Does the medical literature remain inadequately described despite having reporting guidelines for 21 years? - A systematic review of reviews: an update.
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2018 Sep 27;11:495-510. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S155103. eCollection 2018.
10
Response to letter to the editor from Dr Rahman Shiri: The challenging topic of suicide across occupational groups.
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2018 Jan 1;44(1):108-110. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3698. Epub 2017 Dec 8.
引用本文的文献
1
The Perspective on Secondary Research Practices: A Cross-Sectional Analysis.
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Apr 17;13(8):927. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13080927.
2
Principles and framework for assessing the risk of bias for studies included in comparative quantitative environmental systematic reviews.
Environ Evid. 2022;11. doi: 10.1186/s13750-022-00264-0. Epub 2022 Mar 29.
3
PROTOCOL: Systematic review of methods to reduce risk of bias in knowledge translation interventional studies in health-related issues.
Campbell Syst Rev. 2022 Apr 12;18(2):e1236. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1236. eCollection 2022 Jun.
4
Treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD) or dysthymic disorder (DD) in spinal cord injury (SCI) patients: a protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
BMJ Open. 2022 Dec 14;12(12):e055800. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055800.
5
Statin Intake and Gastric Cancer Risk: An Updated Subgroup Meta-analysis Considering Immortal Time Bias.
J Prev Med Public Health. 2022 Sep;55(5):424-427. doi: 10.3961/jpmph.22.209. Epub 2022 Aug 18.
6
Diabetes History and Gastric Cancer Risk: Different Results by Types of Follow-Up Studies.
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2022 May 1;23(5):1523-1528. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2022.23.5.1523.
7
Hormonal Replacement Therapy and Risk of Thyroid Cancer in Women: A Meta-Epidemiological Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies.
J Menopausal Med. 2021 Dec;27(3):141-145. doi: 10.6118/jmm.21023.
8
Risk of harm in synthetic and biological intervention trials in patients with inflammatory arthritis: protocol for a metaepidemiological study focusing on contextual factors.
BMJ Open. 2021 Sep 6;11(9):e049850. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049850.
9
Coffee consumption and risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus in Asians: A meta-epidemiological study of population-based cohort studies.
World J Diabetes. 2021 Jun 15;12(6):908-915. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v12.i6.908.
10
Reporting of methodological studies in health research: a protocol for the development of the MethodologIcal STudy reportIng Checklist (MISTIC).
BMJ Open. 2020 Dec 17;10(12):e040478. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040478.
本文引用的文献
1
An overview of systematic reviews of diagnostic tests accuracy.
Epidemiol Health. 2014 Aug 29;36:e2014016. doi: 10.4178/epih/e2014016. eCollection 2014.
2
Evaluating the quality of evidence from a network meta-analysis.
PLoS One. 2014 Jul 3;9(7):e99682. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099682. eCollection 2014.
3
The quality of reporting methods and results in network meta-analyses: an overview of reviews and suggestions for improvement.
PLoS One. 2014 Mar 26;9(3):e92508. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0092508. eCollection 2014.
4
Graphical tools for network meta-analysis in STATA.
PLoS One. 2013 Oct 3;8(10):e76654. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0076654. eCollection 2013.
5
Commentary: Meta-epidemiology, meta-meta-epidemiology or network meta-epidemiology?
Int J Epidemiol. 2013 Aug;42(4):1131-3. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyt137. Epub 2013 Jul 25.
6
Analysis of the systematic reviews process in reports of network meta-analyses: methodological systematic review.
BMJ. 2013 Jul 1;347:f3675. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f3675.
7
Effects of study precision and risk of bias in networks of interventions: a network meta-epidemiological study.
Int J Epidemiol. 2013 Aug;42(4):1120-31. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyt074. Epub 2013 Jun 27.
8
Influence of trial sample size on treatment effect estimates: meta-epidemiological study.
BMJ. 2013 Apr 24;346:f2304. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f2304.
9
Evaluation of inconsistency in networks of interventions.
Int J Epidemiol. 2013 Feb;42(1):332-45. doi: 10.1093/ije/dys222.
10
Influence of reported study design characteristics on intervention effect estimates from randomised controlled trials: combined analysis of meta-epidemiological studies.
Health Technol Assess. 2012 Sep;16(35):1-82. doi: 10.3310/hta16350.
Zotero 插件