Suppr超能文献

一份监管方面的辩解——对新一代抗抑郁药监管申报中安慰剂对照研究的综述

A regulatory Apologia--a review of placebo-controlled studies in regulatory submissions of new-generation antidepressants.

作者信息

Melander Hans, Salmonson Tomas, Abadie Eric, van Zwieten-Boot Barbara

机构信息

Medical Products Agency, P.O. Box 26, SE-751 03 Uppsala, Sweden.

出版信息

Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2008 Sep;18(9):623-7. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2008.06.003. Epub 2008 Jul 14.

Abstract

Data on percentage of patients experiencing a relevant response (>50% reduction of the baseline Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD) score), average baseline severity and sample size were retrieved for all placebo-controlled studies in regulatory submissions of SSRIs and SNRIs between 1984 and 2003. Overall there was 16%-units (95% CI: 12; 20) more responders on active drug compared to placebo. There was no evidence of a diminishing magnitude of effect with lower severity at baseline. With one exception significant differences varying between 13.5 and 19.3%-units were demonstrated for the individual antidepressants. Statistically significant mean differences versus placebo in change in HAMD are not a proper basis for evaluation of clinical relevance and are not sufficient for approval. Differences in the percentage of patients experiencing a clinically relevant response should also be demonstrated. In this respect, the approved SSRIs and SNRIs were found superior to placebo, independent of severity of depression.

摘要

检索了1984年至2003年间提交给监管机构的所有关于选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRI)和5-羟色胺-去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂(SNRI)的安慰剂对照研究中,出现相关反应(汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)评分较基线降低>50%)的患者百分比、平均基线严重程度和样本量的数据。总体而言,与安慰剂相比,使用活性药物的有反应者多16个百分点(95%置信区间:12;20)。没有证据表明基线严重程度较低时效应大小会减小。除一种药物外,各抗抑郁药的显著差异在13.5至19.3个百分点之间。HAMD变化中与安慰剂相比的统计学显著平均差异并非评估临床相关性的合适依据,也不足以获批。还应证明出现临床相关反应的患者百分比存在差异。在这方面,已获批的SSRI和SNRI被发现优于安慰剂,与抑郁严重程度无关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验