Suppr超能文献

用于治疗痴呆症激越和精神病的抗抑郁药。

Antidepressants for agitation and psychosis in dementia.

作者信息

Seitz Dallas P, Adunuri Nikesh, Gill Sudeep S, Gruneir Andrea, Herrmann Nathan, Rochon Paula

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Queen's University, 752 King Street West, Kingston, Ontario, Canada, K7L 4X3.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Feb 16(2):CD008191. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008191.pub2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Agitation and psychosis are common among older adults with dementia and are challenging to manage. At the present time, little is known about the efficacy and safety of antidepressant medications when used to treat these symptoms.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the safety and efficacy of antidepressants in treating psychosis and agitation in older adults with Alzheimer's disease, vascular, or mixed dementia.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Group's Specialized Register which included Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library 2009, Issue 3), MEDLINE (January 1950 to October 2009), EMBASE (1980 - October 2009), CINAHL (all dates - October 2009) and PsycINFO (1806 to October 2009).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized, controlled trials of antidepressants (selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), tricyclic antidepressants, trazodone, and other antidepressants), compared to either placebo or comparator medications (typical or atypical antipsychotics, anticonvulsants, benzodiazepines, cholinesterase inhibitors, memantine or other medications) for treatment of agitation or psychosis in older adults with dementia.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted trial data. We collected information on efficacy as measured by dementia neuropsychiatric symptom rating scales and adverse effects. Study authors were contacted for additional information.

MAIN RESULTS

Nine trials including a total of 692 individuals were included in the review. Five studies compared SSRIs to placebo and two studies were combined in a meta-analysis for the outcome of change in Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI) scores. There was a significant difference between antidepressants and placebo on measures of agitation as reported on the change in CMAI total score (mean difference (MD), -0.89, 95% CI, -1.22 to -0.57) although the results were heavily weighted by one large study. There were no significant differences in change in behavioral symptoms of dementia for SSRIs compared to placebo in the one study that reported on changes in the Neuropsychiatric Inventory and Behavioral Pathology in Dementia scales. One study comparing citalopram to placebo found a significant difference in NPS as measured on the Neurobehavioral Rating Scale (NBRS) after controlling for baseline severity NBRS score although the unadjusted mean difference was not statistically significant (MD - 7.70, 95% CI: -16.57 to 1.17). There was no difference in the rates of trial withdrawals due to adverse events for SSRIs compared to placebo for four studies reporting this outcome (relative risk (RR), 1.07, 95% CI: 0.55 to 2.11) or in the number of trial withdrawals due to any cause in the three studies reporting this outcome (RR, 0.91, 95% CI, 0.65 to 1.26). One study compared the SSRI citalopram to the atypical antipsychotic risperidone and found no difference in NBRS scores, trial withdrawals due to any cause or trial withdrawals due to adverse events although the rates of adverse events as measured on the UKU side effect scale total score were lower for citalopram (MD -2.82, 95% CI: -4.94 to -0.70). Three studies compared SSRIs to typical antipsychotics. In meta-analysis of two studies there was no statistically significant differences in changes in CMAI total scores (MD, 4.66, 95% CI: -3.58 to 12.90). There was also no difference in trial withdrawals due to any cause or due to adverse events for SSRIs compared to typical antipsychotics. One study of trazodone compared to placebo did not find any significant difference in change in CMAI total scores (MD, 5.18, 95% CI, -2.86 to 13.22) or trial withdrawals due to any cause (RR, 1.06, 95% CI, 0.54 to 2.09). Two studies comparing trazodone to haloperidol also failed to detect any difference in change in CMAI total scores (MD, 3.28, 95% CI, -3.28 to 9.85) or trial withdrawals due to any cause (RR, 0.79, 95% CI, 0.43 to 1.46).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Currently there are relatively few studies of antidepressants for the treatment of agitation and psychosis in dementia. The SSRIs sertraline and citalopram were associated with a reduction in symptoms of agitation when compared to placebo in two studies. Both SSRIs and trazodone appear to be tolerated reasonably well when compared to placebo, typical antipsychotics and atypical antipsychotics. Future studies involving more subjects are required to determine if SSRIs, trazodone, or other antidepressants are safe and effective treatments for agitation and psychosis in dementia.

摘要

背景

激越和精神病在患有痴呆症的老年人中很常见,且难以处理。目前,对于使用抗抑郁药物治疗这些症状的疗效和安全性知之甚少。

目的

评估抗抑郁药物治疗患有阿尔茨海默病、血管性痴呆或混合性痴呆的老年人的精神病和激越的安全性和疗效。

检索策略

我们检索了Cochrane痴呆与认知改善小组的专业注册库,其中包括Cochrane对照试验中央注册库(《Cochrane图书馆》2009年第3期)、MEDLINE(1950年1月至2009年10月)、EMBASE(1980 - 2009年10月)、CINAHL(所有年份 - 2009年10月)和PsycINFO(1806年至2009年10月)。

选择标准

将抗抑郁药物(选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRI)、三环类抗抑郁药、曲唑酮及其他抗抑郁药)与安慰剂或对照药物(典型或非典型抗精神病药、抗惊厥药、苯二氮卓类、胆碱酯酶抑制剂、美金刚或其他药物)进行比较的随机对照试验,用于治疗患有痴呆症的老年人的激越或精神病。

数据收集与分析

两位作者独立评估试验质量并提取试验数据。我们收集了通过痴呆神经精神症状评定量表测量的疗效信息以及不良反应信息。与研究作者联系以获取更多信息。

主要结果

该评价纳入了9项试验,共涉及692名个体。5项研究将SSRI与安慰剂进行比较,2项研究合并进行荟萃分析以得出科恩-曼斯菲尔德激越量表(CMAI)评分变化这一结果。抗抑郁药与安慰剂在CMAI总分变化所报告的激越测量指标上存在显著差异(平均差(MD),-0.89,95%置信区间,-1.22至-0.57),尽管结果在很大程度上受一项大型研究的影响。在一项报告了神经精神科问卷和痴呆行为病理学量表变化的研究中,与安慰剂相比,SSRI在痴呆行为症状变化方面无显著差异。一项将西酞普兰与安慰剂进行比较的研究发现,在控制基线严重程度NBRS评分后,神经行为评定量表(NBRS)测量的神经精神症状存在显著差异,尽管未调整的平均差无统计学意义(MD - 7.70,95%置信区间:-16.57至1.17)。4项报告此结果的研究中,与安慰剂相比,SSRI因不良事件导致的试验退出率无差异(相对危险度(RR),1.07,95%置信区间:0.55至2.11),3项报告此结果的研究中,因任何原因导致的试验退出数量也无差异(RR,0.91,95%置信区间,0.65至1.26)。一项研究将SSRI西酞普兰与非典型抗精神病药利培酮进行比较,发现NBRS评分、因任何原因导致的试验退出或因不良事件导致的试验退出均无差异,尽管以西酞普兰(MD -2.82,95%置信区间:-4.94至-0.70)在UKU副作用量表总分测量的不良事件发生率较低。3项研究将SSRI与典型抗精神病药进行比较。两项研究的荟萃分析中,CMAI总分变化无统计学显著差异(MD,4.66,95%置信区间:-3.58至12.90)。与典型抗精神病药相比,SSRI因任何原因或因不良事件导致的试验退出也无差异。一项将曲唑酮与安慰剂进行比较的研究未发现CMAI总分变化有任何显著差异(MD,5.18,95%置信区间,-2.86至13.22)或因任何原因导致的试验退出有差异(RR,1.06,95%置信区间,0.54至2.09)。两项将曲唑酮与氟哌啶醇进行比较的研究也未发现CMAI总分变化有任何差异(MD,3.28,95%置信区间,-3.28至9.85)或因任何原因导致的试验退出有差异(RR,0.79,95%置信区间,0.43至1.46)。

作者结论

目前关于抗抑郁药物治疗痴呆症激越和精神病的研究相对较少。两项研究中,与安慰剂相比,SSRI舍曲林和西酞普兰与激越症状减轻相关。与安慰剂、典型抗精神病药和非典型抗精神病药相比,SSRI和曲唑酮似乎耐受性都较好。需要更多受试者参与的未来研究来确定SSRI、曲唑酮或其他抗抑郁药是否是治疗痴呆症激越和精神病的安全有效疗法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验