Quigley Martin M, Mate Timothy P, Sylvester John E
Calypso Medical Technologies, Seattle, WA 98121, USA.
Urol Oncol. 2009 Sep-Oct;27(5):473-82. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2008.04.017. Epub 2008 Jul 14.
To evaluate the accuracy, utility, and cost effectiveness of a new electromagnetic patient positioning and continuous, real-time monitoring system, which uses permanently implanted resonant transponders in the target (Calypso 4D Localization System and Beacon transponders, Seattle, WA) to continuously monitor tumor location and movement during external beam radiation therapy of the prostate.
This clinical trial studied 43 patients at 5 sites. All patients were implanted with 3 transponders each. In 41 patients, the system was used for initial alignment at each therapy session. Thirty-five patients had continuous monitoring during their radiation treatment. Over 1,000 alignment comparisons were made to a commercially available kV X-ray positioning system (BrainLAB ExacTrac, Munich, Germany). Using decision analysis and Markov processes, the outcomes of patients were simulated over a 5-year period and measured in terms of costs from a payer's perspective and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs).
All patients had satisfactory transponder implantations for monitoring purposes. In over 75% of the treatment sessions, the correction to conventional positioning (laser and tattoos) directed by an electromagnetic patient positioning and monitoring system was greater than 5 mm. Ninety-seven percent (34/35) of the patients who underwent continuous monitoring had target motion that exceeded preset limits at some point during the course of their radiation therapy. Exceeding preset thresholds resulted in user intervention at least once during the therapy in 80% of the patients (28/35). Compared with localization using ultrasound, electronic portal imaging devices (EPID), or computed tomography (CT), localization with the electromagnetic patient positioning and monitoring system yielded superior gains in QALYs at comparable costs.
Most patients positioned with conventional tattoos and lasers for prostate radiation therapy were found by use of the electromagnetic patient positioning and monitoring system to have alignment errors exceeding 5 mm. Almost all patients undergoing external beam radiation of the prostate have been shown to have target organ movement exceeding 3 mm during radiation therapy delivery. The ability of the electromagnetic technology to monitor tumor target location during the same time as radiation therapy is being delivered allows clinicians to provide real time adaptive radiation therapy for prostate cancer. This permits clinicians to intervene when the prostate moves outside the radiation isocenter, which should decrease adverse events and improve patient outcomes. Additionally, a cost-utility analysis has demonstrated that the electromagnetic patient positioning and monitoring system offers patient outcome benefits at a cost that falls well within the payer's customary willingness to pay (WTP) threshold of $50,000 per QALY.
评估一种新型电磁患者定位及连续实时监测系统的准确性、实用性和成本效益,该系统使用植入目标部位的永久性共振应答器(Calypso 4D定位系统和信标应答器,华盛顿州西雅图),在前列腺外照射放疗期间连续监测肿瘤位置和移动情况。
本临床试验在5个地点研究了43例患者。所有患者均植入3个应答器。41例患者在每次治疗时使用该系统进行初始定位。35例患者在放疗期间进行连续监测。与市售的千伏X射线定位系统(BrainLAB ExacTrac,德国慕尼黑)进行了1000多次定位比较。使用决策分析和马尔可夫过程,对患者5年期间的预后进行模拟,并从支付方角度以成本和质量调整生命年(QALY)进行衡量。
所有患者的应答器植入均适合监测目的。在超过75%的治疗疗程中,电磁患者定位及监测系统指导下对传统定位(激光和纹身)的校正超过5毫米。接受连续监测的患者中有97%(34/35)在放疗过程中的某些时候目标移动超过预设限度。在80%的患者(28/35)中,超过预设阈值导致在治疗期间至少进行一次用户干预。与使用超声、电子射野影像装置(EPID)或计算机断层扫描(CT)进行定位相比,电磁患者定位及监测系统在成本相当的情况下,在QALY方面有更好的收益。
通过电磁患者定位及监测系统发现,大多数采用传统纹身和激光定位进行前列腺放疗的患者存在超过5毫米的对准误差。几乎所有接受前列腺外照射放疗的患者在放疗过程中目标器官移动均超过3毫米。电磁技术在放疗期间同时监测肿瘤目标位置的能力使临床医生能够为前列腺癌提供实时自适应放疗。这使临床医生能够在前列腺移出放射等中心时进行干预,这应会减少不良事件并改善患者预后。此外,成本效用分析表明,电磁患者定位及监测系统以远低于支付方通常每QALY 50000美元的支付意愿(WTP)阈值的成本为患者带来了预后益处。