Opatrná S, Klaboch J
I. interní klinika Lékarské fakulty UK a FN Plzen.
Vnitr Lek. 2008 May;54(5):523-9.
Together with hemodialysis and renal transplantation, peritoneal dialysis is an established method of renal replacement therapy. While evolving in parallel with hemodialysis worldwide, it was not until 1990 that peritoneal dialysis, as we know it today, was introduced to this country when high-quality disposables also became available. In the early 1990s, after adequately increasing the throughput of our dialysis and transplant centers, renal replacement therapy became available to all patients requiring it, that is, also to those with diabetes and other patients with comorbidities in this country. The mortality rates of dialysis-dependent patients with diabetes and chronic renal failure are significantly higher compared with those of dialysis patients without diabetes. This holds true both for hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis. The survival rates of dialysis patients (with and without diabetes) over the first years of dialysis treatment are higher for those on peritoneal dialysis compared with hemodialysis, presumably because residual renal function is maintained longer with peritoneal dialysis. Peritoneal dialysis in patients with diabetes is usually associated with a higher incidence of peritonitis, but not its complications. This is not the case in our unit where the incidence of peritonitis does not differ significantly between patients with diabetes (1 : 38.9 months) and those without it (1 : 51.4 months). However, peritonitis incidence in our center is kept at levels much lower than accepted by the European guidelines (1 : 24) and those developed by the International Society of Peritoneal Dialysis (1 : 18), and than is usual in current clinical practice. Peritoneal dialysis patients and, in particular, those with diabetes, are likely to benefit from the use of modern peritoneal dialysis solutions containing the glucose polymer icodextrin or amino acids as the osmotic agent instead of glucose, or dialysis solutions with a reduced content of glucose degradation products. Such solutions have been shown to feature improved biocompatibility parameters and lower systemic metabolic load. Some observational non-randomized trials have reported improved survival and a lower incidence of peritonitis in patients both with and without diabetes treated with these modern dialysis solutions. Randomized trials are warranted to confirm these findings.
腹膜透析与血液透析和肾移植一样,是一种成熟的肾脏替代治疗方法。在全球范围内,腹膜透析与血液透析同步发展,但直到1990年,随着高质量一次性用品的出现,我们今天所熟知的腹膜透析才被引入我国。20世纪90年代初,在充分提高我们透析和移植中心的治疗量后,肾脏替代治疗可供所有有需要的患者使用,也就是说,我国的糖尿病患者和其他合并症患者也能接受治疗。与非糖尿病透析患者相比,依赖透析的糖尿病和慢性肾衰竭患者的死亡率显著更高。血液透析和腹膜透析都是如此。在透析治疗的头几年,腹膜透析患者(无论有无糖尿病)的生存率高于血液透析患者,这可能是因为腹膜透析能更长时间地维持残余肾功能。糖尿病患者进行腹膜透析通常腹膜炎发病率较高,但并发症发生率并非如此。在我们科室并非如此,糖尿病患者(1 : 38.9个月)和非糖尿病患者(1 : 51.4个月)的腹膜炎发病率没有显著差异。然而,我们中心的腹膜炎发病率远低于欧洲指南(1 : 24)和国际腹膜透析学会制定的指南(1 : 18)所认可的水平,也低于当前临床实践中的常见水平。腹膜透析患者,尤其是糖尿病患者,可能会受益于使用含有葡萄糖聚合物艾考糊精或氨基酸作为渗透剂而非葡萄糖的现代腹膜透析液,或葡萄糖降解产物含量降低的透析液。这些溶液已被证明具有改善的生物相容性参数和较低的全身代谢负荷。一些观察性非随机试验报告称,使用这些现代透析液治疗的患者(无论有无糖尿病)生存率提高,腹膜炎发病率降低。需要进行随机试验来证实这些发现。