Zhu Carolyn W, Scarmeas Nikolaos, Stavitsky Karina, Albert Marilyn, Brandt Jason, Blacker Deborah, Sano Mary, Stern Yaakov
Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center and Program of Research on Serious Physical and Mental Illness, Targeted Research Enhancement Program, James J. Peters VA Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA.
Alzheimers Dement. 2008 Jul;4(4):280-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2008.02.008. Epub 2008 Apr 21.
The objective of this study was to compare total costs of care and its major components for community-living patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) or dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB). This cross-sectional analysis of baseline data from the Predictors II Study took place in three university-based AD centers in the U.S.
Community-living patients clinically diagnosed with probable AD (n = 170) or DLB (n = 25) with a modified Mini-Mental State examination (mMMS) score > or =30, equivalent to a score of approximately > or =16 on the Folstein Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), participated in this study. Patient and informant reported on patients' use of direct medical care, direct nonmedical care, and informal care. Patients' clinical and demographic characteristics included global cognitive status (measured by MMSE), functional capacity (measured by Blessed Dementia Rating Scale), psychotic symptoms, behavioral problems, depressive symptoms, extrapyramidal signs, comorbidities, age, and sex. Costs were compared by using covariate matching methods.
Unadjusted total costs and direct medical costs were not significantly different between AD and DLB patients. Compared with AD patients, unadjusted indirect costs were significantly higher and unadjusted direct nonmedical costs were significantly lower among DLB patients. After adjusting for age, sex, cognitive and functional status, differences in all cost components between DLB and AD patients were no longer statistically significant.
Apparent cost differences were largely attributed to differences in patients' cognitive and functional status. However, the small sample size for DLB patients might have limited power to detect statistically significant differences in costs of care between these groups.
本研究的目的是比较社区居住的阿尔茨海默病(AD)或路易体痴呆(DLB)患者的护理总成本及其主要组成部分。这项对预测II研究基线数据的横断面分析在美国三个大学附属的AD中心进行。
社区居住的临床诊断为可能患有AD(n = 170)或DLB(n = 25)的患者,改良简易精神状态检查(mMMS)得分≥30,相当于Folstein简易精神状态检查(MMSE)得分约≥16,参与了本研究。患者及其 informant 报告了患者对直接医疗护理、直接非医疗护理和非正式护理的使用情况。患者的临床和人口统计学特征包括整体认知状态(通过MMSE测量)、功能能力(通过Blessed痴呆评定量表测量)、精神病症状、行为问题、抑郁症状、锥体外系体征、合并症、年龄和性别。通过协变量匹配方法比较成本。
AD和DLB患者之间未调整的总成本和直接医疗成本没有显著差异。与AD患者相比,DLB患者未调整的间接成本显著更高,未调整的直接非医疗成本显著更低。在调整年龄、性别、认知和功能状态后,DLB和AD患者之间所有成本组成部分的差异不再具有统计学意义。
明显的成本差异主要归因于患者认知和功能状态的差异。然而,DLB患者的样本量较小,可能限制了检测这些组之间护理成本统计学显著差异的能力。