Crawford Jeffrey, Glaspy John A, Stoller Ronald G, Tomita Dianne K, Vincent Martha E, McGuire Brian W, Ozer Howard
Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.
Support Cancer Ther. 2005 Oct 1;3(1):36-46. doi: 10.3816/SCT.2005.n.023.
A phase III study of filgrastim as an adjunct to combination chemotherapy in previously untreated patients with limited- or extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer was conducted. This final analysis explores baseline factors that might predict febrile neutropenia and also reports the results of 463 open-label filgrastim cycles that were delivered after patients' initial episode of the primary endpoint, ie, febrile neutropenia.
A total of 244 patients were randomized to receive placebo or filgrastim in </= 6 cycles of chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin/etoposide).
The cumulative percent of patients receiving filgrastim who experienced febrile neutropenia was approximately 50% lower than those given placebo (38% vs. 74%, respectively; P < 0.0001). Significant treatment-related reductions were also seen in the incidence and duration of grade 4 neutropenia. Cycle 1 displayed the highest incidence of neutropenia with or without fever and the longest duration of neutropenia relative to later cycles. Patients crossing over to open-label filgrastim from their blinded treatment assignment displayed event rates similar to those in the blinded filgrastim group. Patients who experienced febrile neutropenia in cycle 1 were at a significantly higher risk for subsequent events compared with those who were event-free in cycle 1. Women displayed a higher risk for febrile neutropenia than men, but no other baseline risk factors were detected.
Given the high rate of febrile neutropenia in cycle 1 and the higher risk for subsequent events in patients with a cycle 1 event, we conclude that growth factor administration starting in cycle 1 should be considered for patients receiving moderately to highly myelosuppressive chemotherapy regimens.
开展了一项III期研究,评估非格司亭作为联合化疗辅助药物用于既往未接受过治疗的局限期或广泛期小细胞肺癌患者的疗效。本最终分析探讨了可能预测发热性中性粒细胞减少的基线因素,并报告了在患者出现主要终点事件(即发热性中性粒细胞减少)的初始发作后进行的463个开放标签非格司亭疗程的结果。
总共244例患者被随机分配接受安慰剂或非格司亭,进行≤6个周期的化疗(环磷酰胺/阿霉素/依托泊苷)。
接受非格司亭治疗且发生发热性中性粒细胞减少的患者累积百分比比接受安慰剂的患者低约50%(分别为38%和74%;P<0.0001)。4级中性粒细胞减少的发生率和持续时间也出现了与治疗相关的显著降低。相对于后续周期,第1周期中性粒细胞减少(无论有无发热)的发生率最高,且中性粒细胞减少持续时间最长。从盲法治疗分配转为接受开放标签非格司亭治疗的患者,其事件发生率与盲法非格司亭组相似。与第1周期无事件发生的患者相比,第1周期发生发热性中性粒细胞减少的患者后续事件发生风险显著更高。女性发热性中性粒细胞减少的风险高于男性,但未检测到其他基线风险因素。
鉴于第1周期发热性中性粒细胞减少的发生率较高,且第1周期发生事件的患者后续事件发生风险更高,我们得出结论,对于接受中度至高度骨髓抑制化疗方案的患者,应考虑从第1周期开始给予生长因子。