Allgulander C, Nutt D, Detke M, Erickson J, Spann M, Walker D, Ball S G, Russell J M
Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Section of Psychiatry, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
J Psychopharmacol. 2008 Jun;22(4):417-25. doi: 10.1177/0269881108091588.
The present study is a non-inferiority comparison of duloxetine 60-120 mg/day and venlafaxine extended-release (XR) 75-225 mg/day for the treatment of adults with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). The non-inferiority test was a prespecified plan to pool data from two nearly identical 10-week, multicentre, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind studies of duloxetine 60-120 mg/day and venlafaxine 75-225 mg/ day for the treatment of GAD. An independent expert consensus panel provided six statistical and clinical criteria for determining non-inferiority between treatments. Response was defined as > or =50% reduction in Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA) total score. In the pooled sample, patients were randomly assigned to duloxetine (n = 320), venlafaxine XR (n = 333) or placebo (n = 331). For the non-inferiority analysis, the per-protocol patients who were treated with duloxetine (n = 239) or venlafaxine XR (n = 262) improved significantly more (mean HAMA reductions were -15.4 and -15.2, respectively) than placebo-treated patients (n = 267; -11.6, P < or = 0.001, both comparisons). Response rates were 56%, 58% and 40%, respectively. Discontinuation rate because of AEs was significantly higher for duloxetine (13.4%, P < or = 0.001) and venlafaxine XR (11.4%, P < or = 0.01) groups compared with placebo (5.4%). Duloxetine 60-120 mg/day met all statistical and clinical criteria for non-inferiority and exhibited a similar tolerability profile compared with venlafaxine XR 75-225 mg/day for the treatment of adults with GAD.
本研究是一项关于度洛西汀60 - 120毫克/天与文拉法辛缓释剂(XR)75 - 225毫克/天治疗成人广泛性焦虑症(GAD)的非劣效性比较。非劣效性试验是一项预先设定的计划,将两项几乎相同的为期10周的多中心、随机、安慰剂对照、双盲研究的数据合并,这两项研究分别是关于度洛西汀60 - 120毫克/天和文拉法辛75 - 225毫克/天治疗GAD。一个独立的专家共识小组提供了六项统计和临床标准来确定治疗之间的非劣效性。反应定义为汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HAMA)总分降低≥50%。在合并样本中,患者被随机分配到度洛西汀组(n = 320)、文拉法辛XR组(n = 333)或安慰剂组(n = 331)。对于非劣效性分析,接受度洛西汀治疗的符合方案患者(n = 239)或文拉法辛XR治疗的符合方案患者(n = 262)比接受安慰剂治疗的患者(n = 267;降低11.6,P≤0.001,两项比较)改善更显著(平均HAMA降低分别为15.4和15.2)。缓解率分别为56%、58%和40%。与安慰剂组(5.4%)相比,度洛西汀组(13.4%,P≤0.001)和文拉法辛XR组(11.4%,P≤0.01)因不良事件导致的停药率显著更高。度洛西汀60 - 120毫克/天符合所有非劣效性的统计和临床标准,并且在治疗成人GAD方面与文拉法辛XR 75 - 225毫克/天表现出相似的耐受性。