Suppr超能文献

采用紫外或质谱检测的高效液相色谱法测定人血浆中的内源性尿嘧啶和二氢尿嘧啶。

HPLC with UV or mass spectrometric detection for quantifying endogenous uracil and dihydrouracil in human plasma.

作者信息

Svobaite Rūta, Solassol Isabelle, Pinguet Frederic, Ivanauskas Liudas, Brès Janine, Bressolle Françoise M M

机构信息

Pharmacokinetic Laboratory, Faculty of Pharmacy, University Montpellier I, Montpellier, France.

出版信息

Clin Chem. 2008 Sep;54(9):1463-72. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2007.102251. Epub 2008 Jul 17.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

We developed and compared 2 different methods for quantifying uracil (U) and dihydrouracil (UH(2)) in BSA and human plasma. Special attention was paid to the selectivity/specificity and the absence of a matrix effect. The UH(2)/U ratio is intended as a biomarker to identify patients with deficiency in 5-fluorouracil metabolism.

METHODS

We quantified U and UH(2) with 2 liquid chromatography methods after solid-phase extraction, one with UV detection (LC-UV) and the other with mass spectrometric detection (LC-MS). We selected 2 internal standards to prevent the risk of interferences. Separation was achieved with a Waters Atlantis dC18 column (LC-MS) or a Waters SymmetryShield RP18 column connected with an Atlantis dC18 (LC-UV). Mass spectrometric data were acquired in single-ion monitoring mode.

RESULTS

Assay imprecision in BSA solution was <15% (LC-UV) and <12% (LC-MS); in plasma, assay imprecision was <9.5% and <9.0%, respectively. Recoveries were 88.2%-110% (LC-UV) and 94.8%-107% (LC-MS). Extraction efficiencies were >or=89.0%. In BSA, the lower limits of quantification for U and UH(2) were 2.5 microg/L and 6.25 microg/L, respectively, for the LC-UV method and 2.5 microg/L and 3.1 microg/L for LC-MS. The corresponding values in plasma were 11.6 microg/L and 21.5 microg/L, and 4.1 microg/L and 12.1 microg/L.

CONCLUSIONS

To estimate endogenous U and UH(2) concentrations and their ratio, we recommend the use of a drug-free human plasma pool in which baseline U and UH(2) concentrations have previously been measured with the standard-addition method. Our LC-MS method, which has the better test performance and is useful for measuring UH(2)/U ratios in cancer patients, is preferred when this equipment is available.

摘要

背景

我们开发并比较了两种不同的方法来定量牛血清白蛋白(BSA)和人血浆中的尿嘧啶(U)和二氢尿嘧啶(UH₂)。特别关注了选择性/特异性以及基质效应的不存在。UH₂/U 比值旨在作为一种生物标志物,用于识别 5-氟尿嘧啶代谢缺陷的患者。

方法

我们在固相萃取后,用两种液相色谱方法对 U 和 UH₂进行定量,一种采用紫外检测(LC-UV),另一种采用质谱检测(LC-MS)。我们选择了两种内标以防止干扰风险。使用 Waters Atlantis dC18 柱(LC-MS)或与 Atlantis dC18 相连的 Waters SymmetryShield RP18 柱(LC-UV)实现分离。质谱数据在单离子监测模式下采集。

结果

在 BSA 溶液中,测定的不精密度小于 15%(LC-UV)和小于 12%(LC-MS);在血浆中,测定的不精密度分别小于 9.5%和小于 9.0%。回收率为 88.2% - 110%(LC-UV)和 94.8% - 107%(LC-MS)。提取效率大于或等于 89.0%。在 BSA 中,对于 LC-UV 方法,U 和 UH₂的定量下限分别为 2.5 μg/L 和 6.25 μg/L,对于 LC-MS 为 2.5 μg/L 和 3.1 μg/L。血浆中的相应值分别为 11.6 μg/L 和 21.5 μg/L,以及 4.1 μg/L 和 12.1 μg/L。

结论

为了估计内源性 U 和 UH₂的浓度及其比值,我们建议使用一个无药物的人血浆池,其中基线 U 和 UH₂浓度先前已用标准加入法测量。当有该设备时,我们的 LC-MS 方法具有更好的测试性能,可用于测量癌症患者的 UH₂/U 比值,因此更受青睐。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验