Wang Ying, van Klaveren Rob J, van der Zaag-Loonen Hester J, de Bock Geertruida H, Gietema Hester A, Xu Dong Ming, Leusveld Anne L M, de Koning Harry J, Scholten Ernst T, Verschakelen Johny, Prokop Mathias, Oudkerk Matthijs
Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Radiology. 2008 Aug;248(2):625-31. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2482070957.
To retrospectively assess volume measurement variability in solid pulmonary nodules (volume, 15-500 mm(3)) detected at lung cancer screening and to quantify the independent effects of nodule morphology, size, and location.
This retrospective study was a substudy of the screening program that was approved by the Dutch Ministry of Health, and all participants provided written informed consent. Two independent readers used semiautomated software to measure the volume of pulmonary nodules detected in 6774 participants aged 50-75 years (5917 men). Nodules were classified according to their location (purely intraparenchymal, pleural based, juxtavascular, or fissure attached), morphology (smooth, polylobulated, spiculated, or irregular), and size (<or=50 mm(3) or >50 mm(3)). The level of agreement was expressed by using the absolute values of the relative volume differences (RVDs). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed, and odds ratios (ORs) were computed to quantify the independent effects of morphology, location, and size on RVD categories.
Altogether, 4225 nodules in 2239 participants were included. Complete agreement in volume was obtained for 3646 (86%) of the nodules. Disagreement was small (absolute value of RVD < 5%) for 173 (4%) nodules, moderate (absolute value of RVD >or= 5% but < 15%) for 232 (6%), and large (absolute value of RVD >or= 15%) for 174 (4%). Multivariate analysis showed that the ORs of volume disagreement were 15.7, 3.1, and 1.9 for irregular, spiculated, and polylobulated nodules, respectively; 3.5, 2.6, and 2.1 for juxtavascular, pleural-based, and fissure-attached nodules, respectively; and 1.3 for large nodules compared with smooth, purely intraparenchymal, and small reference nodules.
Nodule morphology, location, and size influence volume measurement variability, particularly for juxtavascular and irregular nodules.
回顾性评估肺癌筛查中检测到的实性肺结节(体积为15 - 500立方毫米)的体积测量变异性,并量化结节形态、大小和位置的独立影响。
这项回顾性研究是荷兰卫生部批准的筛查项目的子研究,所有参与者均提供了书面知情同意书。两名独立阅片者使用半自动软件测量了6774名年龄在50 - 75岁(5917名男性)参与者中检测到的肺结节体积。结节根据其位置(纯实质内、胸膜下、血管旁或附着于叶间裂)、形态(光滑、多叶状、毛刺状或不规则)和大小(≤50立方毫米或>50立方毫米)进行分类。一致性水平用相对体积差异(RVD)的绝对值表示。进行多变量逻辑回归分析,并计算优势比(OR)以量化形态、位置和大小对RVD类别的独立影响。
共纳入2239名参与者的4225个结节。3646个(86%)结节的体积测量完全一致。173个(4%)结节的差异较小(RVD绝对值<5%),232个(6%)结节的差异中等(RVD绝对值≥5%但<15%),174个(4%)结节的差异较大(RVD绝对值≥15%)。多变量分析显示,不规则、毛刺状和多叶状结节体积不一致的OR分别为15.7、3.1和1.9;血管旁、胸膜下和附着于叶间裂的结节的OR分别为3.5、2.6和2.1;与光滑、纯实质内和小的参考结节相比,大结节的OR为1.3。
结节形态、位置和大小会影响体积测量变异性,尤其是血管旁和不规则结节。