Volumetric analysis of pulmonary nodules: reducing the discrepancy between the diameter-based volume calculation and voxel-counting method.

BACKGROUND

When assessing the volume of pulmonary nodules on computed tomography (CT) images, there is an inevitable discrepancy between values based on the diameter-based volume calculation and the voxel-counting method, which is derived from the Euclidean distance measurement method on pixel/voxel-based digital image. We aimed to evaluate the ability of a modified diameter measurement method to reduce the discrepancy, and we determined a conversion equation to equate volumes derived from different methods.

METHODS

Two different anthropomorphic phantoms with subsolid and solid nodules were repeatedly scanned under various settings. Nodules in CT images were detected and segmented using a fully automated algorithm and the volume was calculated using three methods: the voxel-counting method ( ), diameter-based volume calculation ( ), and a modified diameter-based volume calculation ( ), in which one pixel spacing was added to the diameters in the three axes (x-, y-, and z-axis). For each nodule, and were compared to by computing the absolute percentage error (APE) as follows: =100 × ( - )/ . Comparisons between APE and APE according to CT parameter setting were performed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The Jonckheere-Terpstra test was used to evaluate trends across the four different nodule sizes.

RESULTS

The deep learning-based computer-aided diagnosis (DL-CAD) successfully detected and segmented all nodules in a fully automatic manner. The APE was significantly less with than with (Wilcoxon signed-rank test, P<0.05) regardless of CT parameters and nodule size. The APE median increased as the size of the nodule decreased. This trend was statistically significant (Jonckheere-Terpstra test, P<0.001) regardless of volume measurement method (diameter-based and modified diameter-based volume calculations).

CONCLUSIONS

Our modified diameter-based volume calculation significantly reduces the discrepancy between the diameter-based volume calculation and voxel-counting method.